Sudden Strike 4

игра здоровская но за фашистов принципиально не играю

Это одна из ужасных игр в данном жанре, в которую не стоит играть и тратить время. Лучше поиграйте в действительно хорошие игры, такие как Company of Heroes, а ещё лучше Men of War - вот это примеры отличных игр.

I have play this game for 300 hours.

A mostly fun WW2 tactical game (an RTS it is not). I played only the single player. Worth giving it a shot if you liked Company of Heroes or the previous Sudden Strike games. Pros: + Some tactical thinking required , due to limited unit availability + Good vision and damage mechanics (matters which side tank is facing) + Storyline is a great touch with mission before/after journal entries and also cinematics + Decent graphics Cons: - Pretty much only one optimal way to play every mission (to get 3 stars), tends to get grindy - Not being able to build new units can get annoying really quickly - Some inbalanced Commanders (e.g. Armored commander seems useless for single player, lacking tank HP replenish). - No coop

This is really a quite enjoyable, fun and historical experience. You can play on easy and run through the campaigns without much fuss or play on normal and have a more tactical experience. I've really had a fun time completing the challenges on each mission which limit your forces in various ways such as no air support or the inability to steal enemy equipment, it is like solving a puzzle at times when determining how to attack a fortified enemy position. I can't speak much to how this game compares to previous Sudden Strike entries but this game is must have for RTS fans, particularly if you are interested in WWII history/setting. It is a very fun and addictive game and each of the DLCs are also worth your time if you enjoy the base game. Each DLC adds new campaign missions with interesting scenarios and achievements that are in line with the base game.

english/українська My biggest dissappointment about this game is not absence of tactics and stategy, not kindergarden difficulty, not tiny maps, not absence of variaty... but YOU, players, who post positive reviews. It is so sad! Please, hear me out, and thats not "oldfart compleining" - you have no idea, how WWII strategies been degraded and simplified, if you post positive review, If you admire this maps ang campaighns. I have no problem, if you have fun in this game, I just want you to understand - you having fun NOT in strategy game.. its... its something else. For years I was desparetly looking for strategy, that will substitute old isometric(!) Sudden Strikes and Blitzkrieg games, and when I have read reviews on SS4 I had so much hope... And I nearly cried after Barbarrossa mission in German campaign, when I just dropped my tanks in frontal attack and with nearly non strategic decisions won. I thought first mission was just tutorial... Then I thought sencond mission is just next to tutorial, so its quite easy and primitive... But when I saw THAT Barbarossa mission, I just desided to make refund, but unfortunatly, because I was giving this game chanse for to long, there was no possibility to bring my money back. It is so bad, that its first game, I wished to make refund... So, in the name or real strategy games - don`t buy it. ________ Найбільше моє розчарування в цій грі полягає не у відсутності тактики та стратегії, не в дитячій складності, не у крихітних картах, не у відсутності різноманітності... а в ВАС, гравцях, які публікують позитивні відгуки. Це так сумно! Будь ласка, вислухайте мене, і це не "бурчання старпера" - ви не маєте уявлення про те, як WWII стратегії погіршилися та примітизувалися, якщо ви опублікуєте позитивний відгуки та якщо ви захоплюєтеся цими картами та кампаніями. У мене немає проблем, якщо ви кайфуєте в цій грі, я просто хочу щоб ви зрозуміли - ви кайфуєте НЕ в стратегії.. це... це щось інше. Протягом багатьох років я відчайдушно шукав стратегію, яка б замінила старі ізометричні (!) ігри Sudden Strikes і Blitzkrieg, і коли я прочитав відгуки про SS4, я мав стільки надії... І я ледь не заплакав після місії Барбарросса в німецькій кампанії, коли я просто кинув свої танки у фронтальній атаці та з мінімальними стратегічними рішеннями переміг. Я думав, що перша місія — це просто навчальна місія... Потім я подумав, що друга місія — лише наступна після навчальної, тому вона досить проста і примітивна... Але коли я побачив ТУ САМУ місію «Барбаросса», я вирішив повернути гроші, але, на жаль, через те, що я давай цій грі шанс занадто довго, вже не було можливості повернути свої гроші. Вона настільки погана, що це перша гра, за яку я хотів повернути гроші... Тож, в ім'я реальних стратегічних ігор - не купуйте...

Sudden Strike 4 was my first contact with the Sudden Strike franchise. Before playing it, my experience with World War II RTS games mostly came from titles like Men of War and Company of Heroes, so I was curious to see what made this series so popular. After finishing the campaigns and DLCs, I think I found the answer: the original Sudden Strike probably earned its reputation years ago. Sudden Strike 4, however, feels like a franchise that stopped evolving. The game is not bad, but it reveals almost everything it has to offer within the first few hours. Most missions follow the same structure, objectives rarely become more interesting and the gameplay never develops beyond its initial formula. New maps, new armies and new campaigns appear, yet the experience remains largely the same from beginning to end. What disappointed me most is that I struggled to find anything that Sudden Strike 4 does better than other RTS games in the same genre. Mechanics such as ammunition management, vehicle repairs, artillery support and unit preservation already existed elsewhere years before this game released. The problem is not that these systems are bad. The problem is that Sudden Strike 4 does very little with them. For a game released in 2017, it often feels like the biggest upgrade over its predecessors is graphical. The core design remains extremely similar to what the franchise had already been doing for years, while other RTS series continued experimenting with new ideas, mechanics and ways to approach strategy. By the end, I did not hate the game. I simply felt indifferent towards it. It has plenty of content, but content alone is not enough when every campaign, DLC and mission starts blending together. The game never surprised me, never challenged my expectations and never gave me a reason to see it as more than an average RTS. I can understand why longtime Sudden Strike fans enjoy it, especially those who grew up with the earlier games. For me, however, it felt like a series that spent years standing still while the rest of the genre moved forward. [b]Score: 5/10[/b] (1) Trash(2) Horrible(3) Very Bad(4) Bad(5) Average (6) Fine(7) Good(8) Very Good(9) Great(10) Master Piece