Frostpunk 2

1 и 2 часть в одной вселенной, но игры про разное. Предупреждать надо.

不如一代一根，玩着太恶心了

Was für eine Verschwendung von Geld un Zeit. Ich habe den ersten Teil geliebt, aber die Umstellung mit den ganzen Fraktionen und gescripteten Ereignissen verhindern jedes Spielvergnügen. Ich brauche keine Politiksimulation im Eis.

I think 9 hours is a fair enough attempt. I am personally not a fan of the expanded scope/complexity compared to FP1, which I really enjoyed. This isnt a bad game, just very different to what I was expecting. Bit too overwhelming for me.

⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀ ⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆ ta bueno ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆ ⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠸⣼⡿ ⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉ ⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇compralo ⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿

Хотел построить коммунизм. По итогу все умерли от голода. Реалистично

本体一般般，DLC真是拉完了，弄的又难还有坏档bug，真不如一代一根

I've made it about halfway through this game. I would very highly recommend the first Frostpunk, which is one of the best games I've ever played. If you played the first one and are curious about this, I'd recommend it if it's on sale, but I can't really recommend it at full price. Pros: Nice graphics, interesting changes to the gameplay of the original; is courageous in making changes to a winning formula instead of just rehashing the original. Cons: The first was an excellent city builder, but it also worked as an RPG. I would think seriously about how to respond to different situations, what the moral response would be when all the answers were wrong, and I would imagine how it would feel to live through the events of the game. The sequel drops much of the storytelling of the first. That's partly just because the scale is different: one death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic. The first really made you care about what happened to individual citizens; for this, if a thousand die of toxic fumes, oh well, there are more where those came from. The design of the game, the story, and the narration just didn't build an emotional attachment the way the first did. I also liked the modular design of the first game - you could play through one of the scenarios in a weekend, then play another one a few weeks or months later, maybe at a higher difficulty level. In this one, there's a series of chapters in one longer narrative, which makes it harder to break up the game into bite-size pieces, and makes it harder to experiment with different difficulty levels and play styles. The first chapters were a bit too easy when I played on the Easy setting, but I didn't really want to turn the difficulty level up because I didn't know how much harder it was going to get, and I wanted to prepare for future events. With the first, you could challenge yourself with a higher difficulty level for one scenario without worrying about dooming yourself for later ones. I don't want to give this a negative review because it was engaging enough that I played for almost 20 hours, and I may still come back later to finish the game, but I also can't recommend it wholeheartedly when the first is still out there, with higher difficulty levels to try.

6.9/10 视角更为宏观之后丢掉了一代的一些游戏性很可惜。

I loved the first frostpunk. This one is differen, I don't know if it is better or worse. But this stupid floaty camera gives me nausea... 100 complains everywhere and they don't fix it. I hope some day they fix it so I can finally play the game. I can't believe this game run through testers and noone said nothing against that. Also the game works horrible and I have a recent PC with a RTx 5060, broken sound, resolution problems even with everything on minimum...