Tactical Warfare

Command & Conquer, но как будто сделанный школьником на мобилки. Вроде основа хорошая, трудно испортить классический шаблон геймплея от отцов жанра RTS, но исполнение на три с минусом: неудобный аляповатый интерфейс, кривой рендер, кривой pathfinding юнитов и в целом не очень стабильная реакция их на команды. Конечно понимаю что это ранний доступ, но даже с учетом этого на три с минусом. Если исправят со временем, то будет хорошая игра.

Jump in knowing that no polish was done on this game: balancing, gameplay, visuals, audio, frame rate, stability, you name it. Issues have been flagged for months, they released it anyway. Played it for the nostalgia, once it wears off, you don't want to come back.

Broken buggy mess units get stuck nore attack enamy buildings that has to be microed the music keeps playing after its closed as well. needs work maybe in time it will be better.

Tactical Warfare is a nostalgic RTS that nails the spirit and look of classic ’90s DOS games, complete with a quirky third-person control mode and a surprisingly deep unit promotion system. The campaign missions are more polished than I expected, and the art style is both functional retro. I’m going to give this a thumbs up *but with caution* because while it shows potential, the frequent bugs, lack of playable MP, and shallow skirmish mode hold it back. The game, in its current state, it’s more like a rough diamond than a polished gem. Pros: *Perfectly captures the spirit and aesthetics of classic ’90s RTS games *Third-person control mode adds a fun, unexpected twist (still glitchy) *Unit promotion system adds depth and strategy *Campaign missions are more polished than expected *Retro art style is both functional and charming * Ambitious for an indie title, with plenty of potential Cons: *Bugs and glitches are frequent *No option to auto-select best weapons for upgraded units *Skirmish mode feels shallow compared to the campaign *Multiplayer mode is nearly non-existent at the moment *Some UI and control elements still feel clunky and unfinished If you want the full scoop on Tactical Warfare, check out my detailed review at www.walawala.gg

《Tactical Warfare》要是放在二十年前，那绝对是秒杀《红警》脚踢星际的存在，看这画质画面简直就是杠杠的，而且还能缩小放大，完美的匹配我们现在的操作习惯。不过可惜的是它出现在RTS（即时战略游戏）已经式微的现在，就连《红警3》和《星际2》这种大型制作都沉江折戟了，《Tactical Warfare》想要翻出太大的浪花，太难了！ 游戏目前有俩个阵营，整体上还是人类打人类的地步，不知道后面会不会开发出其他外星物种。游戏对比《红警》和《星际》多除了“指挥官”的概念，有点类似于《魔兽争霸》里的英雄，这些个角色都有多种不同的武器可以使用，在欺负电脑的时候，操作好了一个个都是以一当百的存在，只是需要一点手操和战斗意识。 整体而言，《Tactical Warfare》可以当做是《红警2.5》来玩吧！有一定的特色，但不算太惊艳，但要说游戏太差，那是真的不至于，只能说年代不对吧！喜欢RTS的还是可以支持一波的，毕竟如今这类型的游戏是真的玩一个少一个了！ [quote]关注[url=https://store.steampowered.com/curator/36224058/]老实人鉴赏家 [/url] [url=https://steamcommunity.com/groups/laoshirenLSR]老实人评测[/url]：独立游戏爱好者聚集地，黄油绅士交流中心。 不错过游戏的亮点，不放过游戏的槽点，带给玩家最直观的测评感受。[/quote]

Hello, I like this game. The only feedback I would like to suggest is add more maps (a lot) and continue to fix bugs/glitches. That's what I prefer. Thanks

Tactical Warfare is an ambitious real-time strategy title that aims to revive the classic feel of large-scale RTS combat while layering in modern ideas and experimental mechanics. Developed and published by Mizrab, the game places players in the middle of a sci-fi conflict born from interdimensional displacement rather than a simple alien invasion narrative. Humanity finds itself sharing a fractured world with refugees from another reality, and this uneasy coexistence quickly escalates into full-scale war. While the story is not delivered through elaborate cutscenes, it provides enough context to frame the conflict and give weight to the battles, grounding the experience in a familiar but intriguing strategic premise. At its core, Tactical Warfare adheres closely to traditional RTS foundations. Players are tasked with gathering resources, constructing bases, expanding territory, and commanding armies across land, air, and sea. The game encourages deliberate planning, as early decisions about economy and infrastructure have long-term consequences once combat escalates. Defensive positioning, production priorities, and map control all play a significant role, rewarding players who think several steps ahead rather than relying solely on brute force. When the systems align, directing large groups of units and watching coordinated assaults unfold can be genuinely satisfying, capturing the sense of command that defines the genre. Faction design is one of the game’s stronger conceptual elements. The opposing sides are designed to feel mechanically distinct, with different unit compositions, strengths, and tactical philosophies. This asymmetry pushes players to adapt their strategies depending on which faction they choose, encouraging experimentation rather than rote build orders. Some units excel at direct confrontation, while others are better suited for harassment, support, or defensive roles, creating opportunities for combined-arms tactics. In theory, this variety lays the groundwork for deep strategic play, especially in skirmish and competitive modes. However, Tactical Warfare’s current identity is heavily shaped by its Early Access status. Many of its ideas feel partially realized, and the overall experience can be inconsistent from match to match. Players may encounter issues with unit behavior, construction flow, or AI decision-making, all of which can undermine confidence in long-term planning. In a genre where precision and reliability are essential, these technical shortcomings can be particularly disruptive, as a single malfunctioning command or stalled production queue can unravel an otherwise sound strategy. These rough edges make it clear that the game is still in a formative stage rather than a finished RTS package. The interface and control scheme further reflect this in-progress state. While the game provides access to a wide range of information and commands, the presentation can feel cluttered or unintuitive, especially for players accustomed to the refined interfaces of genre staples. Basic actions such as issuing attack orders, managing camera movement, or tracking unit status sometimes lack the responsiveness or clarity expected from a polished RTS. This friction does not erase the game’s depth, but it does create an additional learning curve that may deter newcomers or frustrate veterans seeking smooth execution. One of Tactical Warfare’s more experimental features is its hybrid approach to perspective, allowing players to temporarily take direct control of individual units from a more personal viewpoint. This mechanic is an unusual but bold addition to an RTS framework, blurring the line between high-level strategy and moment-to-moment action. When it works, it adds a sense of immediacy and immersion, making key engagements feel more personal. At the same time, it can feel disconnected from the broader strategic flow, and its long-term role within the game’s design remains somewhat unclear. Despite its flaws, Tactical Warfare shows clear signs of potential. Its core ideas—large-scale combined-arms combat, asymmetric factions, and a blend of traditional and experimental mechanics—suggest a game that could grow into a compelling RTS experience with continued refinement. Updates and patches have the opportunity to stabilize systems, improve usability, and flesh out underdeveloped mechanics, potentially transforming frustration into depth. For now, the game appeals most strongly to dedicated strategy fans who are willing to engage with an evolving project and tolerate instability in exchange for early access to its concepts. In its current form, Tactical Warfare is best viewed as a foundation rather than a finished product. It offers moments of genuine strategic satisfaction and hints at a broader vision, but those moments are frequently interrupted by technical and design inconsistencies. Players seeking a polished, competitive RTS experience may find it premature, while those intrigued by ambitious ideas and willing to follow a game’s development over time may see promise worth investing in. As development continues, Tactical Warfare’s success will ultimately depend on how effectively it can transform its ambitious vision into a stable and cohesive strategic experience. Rating: 5/10