Survive and thrive in a post-apocalyptic future — resources are scarce, but opportunity calls! Build the ultimate disaster proof colony, protect your colonists, and restore civilization to a devastated world.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Prices
Each in the currency that store quoted — not converted: the gap between two rows is the publisher's pricing, not an exchange rate.
Discounts
Every price cut of more than 20% we have observed, in each market that quoted one, with this game's chart position on either side of it. These are episodes, not a model: a sale is one event, and one event cannot tell you what the next one will do.
Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 0.29/day in the week to Aug 17 → 0.86/day in the week after.
For scale, across Steam · Top Sellers · Brazil over the last 30 days: the 24 chart moves that followed a price cut of more than 20% went a median of 9 places towards #1, and the 2,419 moves with no price cut behind them went 2 away. One store, one chart, one country — it is the only place we have enough observations to say even that.
Prices outside the United States have been collected since 6 August 2026 and chart positions since 19 July 2026, so a cut older than that has no market to compare and a market that joined later has no history yet. Nothing here is converted between currencies.
About
Sums Steam only; PlayStation, GOG, Epic, Nintendo publish no volume signal, so the true total is higher by an unknown amount.
| Store | Price | Audience | Score | Chart | Est. revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SteamYou are here | $29.99 | 4.6Kreviews | 71% | — | $3.6M |
| $29.99 | 2.3Kratings | 78% | — | not modelled | |
Updates
Build ids and update times come straight from Steam's PICS — the same source SteamDB reads. Patch history grows as we record new builds.
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 830 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
This game gives me hella dopamine
Okay I will keep this short and sweet this game used to be a fun easy game to play for a couple hours, but after years of the game being out the devs added stuff they really didn't need to, I guess to make the game "harder" but it doesn't really do that. All these changes really did was make the game more tedious then actually fun. They also have abandoned the game or its life cycle is over, there was not been a update since 2023. So simply if you like this style of game play it for 30 minutes and refund if you hate it.
Media
Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Every market we collect.
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English, French, German, Polish, Portuguese - Brazil, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Spanish - Latin America
| $8.99−70% |
| 33ratings |
| 74% |
| — |
| not modelled |
| $26.99−10% | — | — | — | not modelled |
| $29.99 | — | — | — | not modelled |
Matched by title — a reused name can pair the wrong games. * is a critic aggregate. Prices and positions are each store's United States storefront; Epic charts worldwide. Audience and Score too, except Steam's, which is worldwide.
Hours played at review time, across 831 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
No
思考好久才給出負評，可以說是缺點55%，優點45% 缺點 1. 整體遊戲缺乏說明，包含網路上的也相當不清楚。 2. 遊戲很多地方都有關鍵性的難度，也就是如果先前走錯一步就可能滅村，又加上自動儲存機制只有一個檔案，變成只能重玩。 3. 缺乏建築物搜尋機制，只能依賴建築物外型在畫面上尋找，但很不幸的建築物建造時會因為旋轉方向不同而有不同樣貌，導致後期只能靠自己記憶或是規劃才能搞清楚哪裡有什麼建築物。 4. 遊戲內沒有小地圖可以一鍵到位，最有效率的是靠鍵盤WSAD在畫面上滑動，整個遊戲大概可能有10%時間在移動畫面。 5. 明明是同一種功能的建築物，會因為科技進度不同，最後總共會出現好幾個版本的建築，但舊版建築卻無法升級，變成需要把舊房子給拆光。 6. 壓死駱駝的最後一根稻草，倉庫的資源分配系統有bug且至今還未修復(八成是不想修了)，倉庫有request resource的功能來要求特定資源儲存在這裡，但選擇列表只列出了部份的資源。 優點: 1. 遊戲算是有難度，即便到後期遇到各式災難，若沒有準備完善還是容易遭到重大損失。 2. 放射污染系統還算有創意。 3. 地下資源還算有創意。 4. 專家系統還算有創意，但在被攻城時希望專家不要袖手旁觀！ 給玩家的建議 1. 一開始就玩最簡單模式，比較容易理解遊戲機制，降低挫折。 2. 認真面對災難 3. 科技研發產出夠用就好，這遊戲後期多餘的科技點數無用，不需要一直佔領科技outpost 4. 不是所有科技都需要研發，每個科技重要性差很多 5. 初期的outpost不要蓋太多，後期還有末日科技同樣也要佔地，但兩者會互斥。
嗯…看得出來很用心想要做得跟其他經營建設遊戲不同 專家(？)系統剛玩也挺有趣 但當中後期怪物、專家變得越來越多的時候 就變得有些麻煩了 畢竟建一建就要跳到大地圖去操控專家去收集資源、清理怪物 久了挺煩的，因為我主要還是想玩經營建設 後期我真的很希望這些專家能自動行動，不要來麻煩我XD 整體還是推薦，但如果你是只想享受經營建設跟資源分配的玩家 我覺得後期的遊戲體驗會讓你很煩燥XD
This game feels like a post-apocalyptic SimCity with a hint of tower defense and a like 2nd big map game that runs simultaneously that has elements that resemble a board game. It combines traditional city-building mechanics with a deep research tree, but without the need for excessive micromanagement. I highly recommend it for casual gamers. Imagine a 3D, above-ground version of Fallout Shelter, but with more advanced strategy and plenty of role-playing moments. Most importantly, It's fun!!
I like the survival aspect of it. Kinda sims like.
Неплохая игра про градострой в пост-апоке. Правда, есть легкое ощущение, что игра недополучила DLC (что для Paradox странно) и не раскрыла свой потенциал целиком. Так же имеется некоторая проблема с поздней частью игры - некоторые возможности, вроде разведения насекомых и выпекания хлеба к этому моменту уже просто не нужны. На распродаже можно взять.
StA provides a satisfying post-apocalyptic city-building experience without end-game mechanics (posted before playing Cold Rush or completing the bunker).
Отличная игра для того, чтобы расслабиться после напряженного рабочего дня!
Active players
Estimated daily and monthly active players (DAU/MAU) modeled from peak concurrency.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Players also reviewed
The games this title's players most often review too — audience affinity.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $4.5M | 4.3K | 89% | $29.99 | |
| $201.7K | 1.5K | 61% | $4.99 | |
| $28M | 51.5K | 85% | $29.99 | |
| $19.7M | 17.8K | 79% | $34.99 | |
| $10.3M | 11.1K | 86% | $24.99 | |
| $6.7M | 10K | 77% | $24.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $3.6M | 10.1K | 94% | $9.99 | |
| $3.6M | 14.9K | 97% | $6.99 | |
| $3.6M | 4.3K | 68% | $29.99 | |
| $3.6M | 8.6K | 91% | $14.99 | |
| $3.6M | 10.5K | 89% | $9.74 | |
| $3.6M | 12.7K | 90% | $7.99 |