Sid Meier's Civilization VII

差评必须给了，为文明这个IP预售就支持，游戏这才多久？新DLC就来收费了，那我们买奠基版的全是大怨种吗？

I've played all the main Civ games from I to VII and this one is my favorite. I've found engaging gameplay from the outset and have enjoyed each update provided since launch. The leader and civ combinations allow me a level of flexibility and custom options I've not had in previous versions and the commanders are an incredible addition. I've finished far more games of Civ VII than any others as the tedium of the endgame is greatly reduced.

Знаете почему эту игру не взламывают без гипервизора? Да потому что она мега скучная, нет никакого веселого движа. Ваша цель была сделать улучшенную шестерку, но вы сделали херню

Summary for 2 second attention span ZOOMERS: Civ 7 is recommend ON SALE, Leaders SUCK. *Date of review is from after the tales of time or whatever it is called. I didn't play the pervious versions of the game. First I love Civ. There are lots of things I like about 7 I would say I like MOST of the game really. This is a focus on what I think is the most glaring issue. Besides the leaders the art is 9/10. These figures are suppose to be bigger than life, but most are underwhelming looking and most of them are WHOS? We want famous leaders, not Harriet Tubman and randos no one has ever heard. Where is Gandhi, Stalin, MAO, Zulu guy, Boudica? Having the big figures from history, dealing with them, and fighting them is a way bigger part of the experience than I think they realize. If I wanted to have randoms I would just get a bunch of stupid anime girl mods. The cast for Civ 7 SUCKS. You have to have the big boys before you bring in the D(EI) squad. Also the trade menu is horrible. (Fighting Harriet Tubman is like not a good experience you thickos, what a horrible CHOICE. Make her a part of a cool policy or bonus something)

leider immer noch unreif es fühlt sich erzwungen und klotzig an

They're not competing against other strategy games - they're competing against Civ V. A pretty game but the amount of pop-ups makes it feel like navigating a cluttered inbox. For my taste, there's a reason why less graphic detail is more thought provoking and engaging. If they reboot Civ V - I would say a very *light* refresh of the graphics and a culling of what works and doesn't work about the franchise would be the move. Let's be honest, these games are going to have to be playable on worse and worse computers because of part scarcity / price. Please, for the love of god, do not go full wharrgarbl and make shiny Blizzard level reboot (unless it's cute kawaii Civ V, i'm on board with that)

Игра в техническом плане хороша. Однако купив полную версию предзаказом, где вроде как изначально включены все последующие длс спустя год оказывается что выходит дополнение на азию, которое уже нужно купить отдельно причём ладно бы оно стоило немного, так его цена просто сумасшедше завышена. За это ставлю жирнейший минус и говорю разработчикам что они реально зажрались, выпустить сырую игру за 100 баксов ещё понять теоретически можно, но когда за эти деньги игрок получает не весь контент, это уже перебор.

hm, hard to decide. i play on a already patched version, so its a bit unfair, because many people experienced a bad game prior to the patch and still do. i think the barebones are there. it feels and plays like just the right mix of civ 5 and 6 dont know if the devs intended to. its straightforward and simple like civ 5, but everything together makes it a interesting tactics sim. and it has basically any civ 6 mechanic, except the districts being way more simple (and actually not present at all anymore) with the new adjancency bonuses. things like warehouses or quarters add some little spice to the building. i played humankind and actually it made me appreciate civ more, not because humankind is bad but because it was so innovative, it made me for example appreciate the civ switch and how civ handles things. civ switch is a bit underwhelming, not because its a bad mechanic, but in humankind for example i think it was the best new implementation and happened way more often. 2 times civ switching is really a bit underwhelming here. how the game plays clicks really well with me, i can actually navigate extremly fast through the rounds without having empty rounds like in civ 6 or humankind where i would click "next round" for like 5-6 rounds without doing anything. i think thats quite an underrated important aspect that civ like games should have. how you build the city is also ok in my opinion, no workers, but maybe there should be some little extra step in acquiring tiles. idk really what but insta work with pop growth seems a bit fast to me. buildings seemed very uninteresting to me somehow. idk how, some where ok some extremly forgettable. i loved how in civ 5 every building had a real standing in the community. every building (or wonder) had some extreme influence depending on how you play. i feel like the buildings lack a bit, but i didnt play for very long so maybe it clicks with me. also i should have mentioned, the era switch feels underwhelming too. i tried to configure the game so it makes the most reductive decisions on era switch, because i wanted to see this (very hated) mechanic in game for the first time. but somehow it made no difference for me. i could keep cities with a certain card or triumph or what its called. other than that i kept all troops (maybe they were only 6). the crisis system is a bit symptomatical for how many stuff of the game is actually quite ok and maybe in future expansions can be made better than civ 5 and 6. but the crisis system for example is really just 5 min work for the devs i guess, and some generic bloat like , choose from a few cards every few rounds that make your game harder. i mean it cant be so bad for the game flow because it adds (very little) challenge to it, but it really feels like they implemented it in the last week of game dev. i like all the directions the game went, i see how people think it has nothing to it. i really hope its a civ 5 where without expansions it felt empty but with them its game of the year easily. so because we need this potential delivered AND because the game ending in ww2 is crazy i think AND because the dlcs policy is really....( not in general, but at this moment where civ 7 stands), i give a thumbs down. if the game actually holds up more than i thought now after a first run, i plan to give thumbs up, especially with some nice update. it already has a nice flow, that doesnt really take off much. the game needs something that elevates it on the next level but also feels very nice and comfortable. something that holds it together. but i wouldnt know what it would be, maybe some major trading mechanic? some diplomatic mechanic? or something entirely else.