Planetbase

这游戏居然要出第二部不知道大家看没有虽然是2027年才出

The core game loop is fairly boring. The resource trees are small. I was looking for a chill builder game but this game isn't really building to anything terribly interesting.

Planetbase is one of those games that quietly earns your respect over time. At first glance, it looks simple: land on a planet, build a base, keep people alive. But once you get past the tutorial phase, you realize the game is really about systems interacting with systems. Power, oxygen, water, food, worker roles, solar conditions, terrain placement — everything is connected, and the game does very little hand-holding once you’re on your own. With over 105 hours played, most of my time has been spent experimenting: optimizing layouts, stress-testing bases, intentionally pushing things too far just to see where they break. Planetbase shines when you stop trying to “win” and start treating it like a sandbox for engineering problems. A small design mistake early on can cascade into a full colony collapse hours later, and when that happens, it rarely feels unfair — it feels like your fault. That’s a compliment. The pacing is slower than modern colony sims, and that won’t be for everyone. There’s no endless tech tree or constant dopamine drip. Instead, Planetbase rewards patience, planning, and foresight. It’s closer to a minimalist simulation than a content-heavy management game, and that restraint is part of its charm. Visually and mechanically, it’s aged surprisingly well. The UI is clean, readable, and functional. The game doesn’t overwhelm you with numbers, but it gives you just enough information to make informed decisions — if you’re paying attention. Is it perfect? No. I’d love deeper late-game systems, more variety, and better mod support. But what’s here is solid, cohesive, and clearly designed by people who understood exactly what kind of game they were making. If you enjoy games where failure teaches you more than success, and where smart design matters more than flashy features, Planetbase is absolutely worth your time. Highly recommended for system-thinkers, tinkerers, and anyone who enjoys building something that actually works — until it doesn’t.

ai有够蠢

Nah. ♥♥♥♥♥♥ dev that keeps misusing the news function on all their other games, for spamming news about their new games. Don't support devs like this.

I'm on the fence about this game. After playing Surviving Mars, this definitely doesn't scratch the same itch. I wish there were elements of exploration or events that added more depth—something to make this colony sim more than just a colony management game. The gameplay feels very limited, and the management panels are basic.

Wow, This is BAD. And I mean BAD. The game in a nutshell: The Biologist is sad because he ist hungry. Because he is hungry he will not grow food. Therefore he and all others will starve. This is one of those games which will go into unsalvagable cascade failure if you did not check 5 different stats every 60 seconds. And of course the game will not do any reasonable autosaves. Because that would be less frustatring and frustration is the only thing intended by design. I had 64 colonists AND a decent amount of food left in storage. But why should that prevent 10 colonists from starving. And so the death spiral begins. Death causes moral to break and from that point on it does not matter what you do. Deactivate everthing in your base exept food production. Does not matter. You are now allowed to watch over an extended ammount of time how basically every single one of you colonist kills himself by refusing to do the things that could save him. This is the 4th or 5th game I played in recent years wiht this kind of logic and they all have one thing in common. Such a game design is B A D !!!

No windowed mode. Frustrating to play on a multiple screen set up. Refunded.