Orwell: Keeping an Eye On You

I was expecting a puzzle game, but it's more a visual novel. I enjoyed it still, i think it's a neat idea overall but imho it would have benefited from having real puzzle elements, rather than just "drag and drop everything" I absolutely love video games that make you control a computer, and you have to look through brower pages, files, etc etc. (i recommend y'all to try The Operator, if you like that kind of stuff too) I'm probably gonna get Orwell 2, i enjoyed this one enough to give the sequel a try, even if the reviews seem a bit more conflicted about it.

为了自由可以大言不惭的恐怖袭击，必须得弄它，别人我都能理解它我理解不了

[h1] 5/10 [/h1] 反乌托邦老资历这一块，游戏本身因过分执着于模拟系统，玩法上存在不少硬缺陷，再加上剧情上纯棋子的主视角很难跟完全不熟的恐怖分子共情，长轴体验平庸拖沓，在全网公敌面前几乎是一个原始一个现代，只能说是游戏界长江后浪推前浪的好例子

Very interesting game to have in your catalog. Changes from the usual RPG. Your choices will shape the investigation of attacks.

It's surprising how relatable this game nowadays. Definitely not a hard game. All options are highlighted and there really is a handful of meaningful choices you can make. Not a lot, but just enough for you to say: "Oh ♥♥♥♥, it's because of me". And these moments hit HARD, especially ones at the ending, I really started questioning my worldview at one point. I don't know about replayability, personally seems too linear for repeated playthrough, but for one-shot experience this game is great!

Симулятор ФСБшника играть онлайн без регистрации почти бесплатно

TL;DR: Great for the most part. An intriguing mystery, in-depth characters, very unique gameplay that I heavily enjoyed. Political commentary is heavy-handed but remains interesting, as most characters are morally grey. Great except the ending. First issue: the late-game twist. I won’t spoil details, but I will talk about the structure of a major late-game twist. I've played this game through 3 times now, and each time the final twist comes out of nowhere. It has foreshadowing in the same way that me saying "you're stupid" foreshadows that I'm going to stab you. People justify it by making these massive lists of all these barely noticeable details that come together to hint at the idea that "hey, [character] may not be a great person". And then the game jumps from that to terrorism. Oh, and a lot of the foreshadowing would only come if people made specific decisions. Certain routes would make the twist (which doesn't change) make more or less sense. The fact that some people think it makes sense and that some people suspected it while playing means that it functionally can't be that bad. To some degree, it makes sense. It did [i]not[/i] land for me though. Second issue: moral flattening. I noticed something as I progressed through the endings. A bit more spoilery here, but again no specifics. Throughout the game, most characters are morally dubious. Even when you've beaten the game, you'll likely have mixed opinions of a lot of the characters. However, once you reach endings that reveal a bit more information, it becomes clear that there's a real "These people were right the whole time and these people are wrong and kick puppies" mindset. They can't let their actions through the story speak for themselves. There has to be a reveal that the bad guys were doing even worse secret stuff and are unequivocally bad and the good guys are all vindicated. Get the game though. Two things about the ending miffed me a bit, but I still had a heck of a lot of fun.

60/100，最早的监视器玩法的游戏之一，但是放在现在看来故事的漏洞和缺陷有些多了。首先，作品名叫Orwell，但是整体环境并没有体现出1984中描写的高压统治；“自由"组织这帮人放炸弹的动机也莫名其妙；而且最后知道计划泄露了还指望策反监视者，what？什么脑回路？还有，一个国家的监视系统的监查工作外包给其他国家，有点难以想象。故事情节也十分的平淡，唯一让我稍微提起精神的情节可能就是“亚伯拉罕”的情节。另外操作界面和画面算是比较简洁的，只是对于这种题材来说这不是重点。如果想玩类似题材的游戏完全可以试试全网公敌。