A Total War Saga: TROY

РАЗРАБИ ПИТУХИ ПОПУЩЕНИЕ 0 БАЛАНСА Я ВАШ РОТ ♥♥♥♥

модификации очень классные

Raus geschmissenes Geld. Das ist nicht TW. Einige Ideen sind gut aber sehr schlecht umgesetzt. Der Kampf auf der Schlachtkarte ist ein wildes durcheinander und nicht wirklich kontrollierbar. wildes Klicken und die Einheiten machen doch was sie wollen. Gegner erklären den Krieg von der anderen Ecke der Karte. Habe mehrmals mit Mittel gespielt nie über die Runde 40 hinaus gekommen, zu viele Feinde die einen angreifen. hat man einmal seinen Helden verloren( Er muss sich erholen) fallen alle über einen her. Da macht es mehr Spaß TW Shogun 1 zu spielen. Ich bereue den Kauf nach bereits einer Woche, gut das ich keine Erweiterungen gekauft habe.

Coming at this in 2026, TROY deserves a "Mixed" review. Remember that this is a "Sagas' installment, so it is much smaller in scale and, in some ways, a trial run for TW: Pharaoh. Indeed, if you're looking for the definitive Bronze Age Total War, the Dynasties update to Pharaoh is it - which incidentally expands the realm of Pharaoh to Troy. So is it worth playing Troy? The main focus of this game is specifically the engagement between the Greeks and the Trojans, with campaigns being character-based. Each character has their own "Homeric" objectives inspired by mythology, typically in conquering specific regions and completing tasks. The end-goal is the same: the conquest of the other side. How this plays out, mostly, is that the early game will be gaining local power, building up the two sides of the war and then sailing across the Aegean. In this sense, it does feel like you're playing the Total War equivalent of having to face a thousand ships from Mycenae, and there is a survival element as you juggle diplomacy, economy and mlitary. There is enough difference in the unique faction mechanics to make each playthrough interesting. Agamemnon, for example, builds his power through gaining vassals and gaining tribute, Achilles has to challenge other heroes and deal with volatile mood swings, and Paris has to stay close to Helen. If there's a deep flaw in Troy, it's the implementation of the war itself. Unlike major Total War games that have a "realm divide" trigger (think civil wars in Rome, the literal realm divide in Shogun 2 or the imperial trigger in Three Kingdoms), the alliances and invasion just happen as part of normal play, and it always ends up as an West vs East cross-map invasion and counter-invasion that plays out the same. On one hand, it's pretty nice to play one part of a big alliance. If you do well in taking territory, you might divert enemy factions away from your allies, or you might play defense and stop invasions as your AI allies sweep through Greece. However, it's also frustrating and anti-fun in some ways, as you more or less have to permenantly station armies to defend coastal areas from invasions by several opposing factions. More often, you have to chase down loose armies that are sacking your rear settlements, especially as they are bunched so close together. The end-game is also a drag. While the Greek side is fairly clean - conquer Troy - the Trojan side is far more tedious, often requiring the complete elimination of Greek factions. The problem is that the Greek factions will very quickly confederate others, so while you have effectively "won" the campaign and objectives, you still have to conquer virtually every territory to eliminate them, making the actual finish to the campaign take twice as long as the campaign itself. Ultimately, how much fun you have with Troy will depend on how willing you are to put up with the unnecessary long campaign objectives.

my face did bark with magical delight

A really fun game, playing as different heroes of the war feels right. The only negative about it is that they didn't keep adding more playable factions. I recommend the mythos version, because it adds a lot of grandiosity to the map(s)

所以这款游戏有城墙有攻门的还有个木马但是没有攻城器械？