Timberborn

游戏可以。水资源做得很好。但是后期机械狸的出现并且没有上限让游戏失色。有了机械狸，基本不用考虑其它的任何东西了。必须要加以改进。机器人出现后一切都可有可无了。这确实是个问题。一般到中后期，有了机械狸基本不用考虑吃穿用度了。游戏可玩性大打折扣。建议设置机器人上限或者其它。。

세번째 종족 출시해주세요

This is one of my favorite cozy games. Super relaxing and entertaining

I work hard so my BEAVERS can live better

Sorely disappointing for a 1.0 There's no endgame goal to strive for and once you solve the only real difficult threat (which you aren't warned about before it happens, the tutorial seems half-baked) there's not much to do other than build and expand. And while I get that for a city builder, some end-state would have been preferable so I can move on to another map/difficulty/beaver type. Building for building's sake is a lazy copout by developers. The gameplay itself is pretty basic, not challenging, and gets old quick. No events, no lore, just - build and expand until you get bored. I have no idea how this is so highly rated, it's entirely overpriced for what you get.

从测试版一路玩到正式版发售，非常不错，希望后续更新还能出新的种族和天候。 另外地图大赛还是很有意思的，希望能多举办地图创建活动，玩了几百小时每个官方图都玩过了，虽然配置能玩得动大地图，但是还是享受螺蛳壳内做道场的感觉，希望官方能多制作几张小地图。

District system and micromanagement are tedious, but on 50x50 maps like Diorama the tight space actually makes it a fun puzzle and solves these issues. Overall it's a great game just keep the maps small.

One reviewer said if you like [i]Civ 6,[/i] you will like [i]Timberborn[/i]. That is not necessarily false, but I’m not sure it’s true either. [i]Civ 6[/i] is a more complex game, not to mention it has an actual endgame. Indeed, it seems so many of those who leave a “Not Recommended” review are criticizing [i]Timberborn[/i] for not being [i]Civ 6.[/i] The common thread in many of those reviews is that you reach a point where you just run out of things to do in [i]Timberborn[/i]. Your beavers have sufficient resources and you have figured out how to deal with the droughts and badtides. You could accumulate more science points to unlock more automation, but why? Chasing achievements, building monuments or otherwise increasing your beavers’ well-being all seems like busywork. Why bother doing it all over again on a new map? There should be more challenges, an endgame, the thrill of victory, a spot on the leaderboard. I get it. If you are a completionist, this might not be your game. [i]Timberborn[/i] offers something different, something quite satisfying if you buy into the whole water motif. You can easily become hooked on making your water management most efficient, even elegant, and on making your hard-working beavers' lives better. [i]Timberborn[/i] does what it does wonderfully well. Even if you only get 35 hours of enjoyment out of it and only play one map, that’s $1 per hour and, in my opinion, money well-spent. Or you could just play [i]Civ 6.[/i] :)

After 90 hours I am still figuring out new things. Water mechanics are great, it's really satisfying seeing a barren or toxic land come back to life, populated with beavers.

Loved it, played 16 hours straight first time launching it