
The Special Support Section is back with more members and more cases to solve! How will this rag-tag group deal with the oncoming threats to Crossbell’s political stability while maintaining their team’s foundation?
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media

About
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English, Japanese**languages with full audio support
Engagement
Hours played at review time, across 45 reviews with recorded playtime.
Reviews
Themes across 45 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
This is a game I deliberated on for a while when writing this review. I can completely understand both sides where some people consider Azure the best game in the series. That being said, I don't think I quite got to that point where I could say that myself. What's so weird about this game is that the highs are so so so unbelievably high but like its just shy of being negated by the unbelievably bad lows. In the past few reviews, I think each entry reasonably could be said to be positive or negative but Azure sits in this weird middle ground where It genuinely does so many things well that make me think "Oh yeah that's why its praised as a masterpiece" and then it does something that kills that notion a while after. What carries this game is the SSS (and co.) In general, this game despite adding a few new faces, it does not take away from the core 4 narratively speaking, their characters are more fleshed out and compelling. I thought Randy was the best example, I loved the arc with him at the end of Chapter 3 and him just clearly maturing and unlike a lot of the reveals in the series, I think his background fits with his character, and actually recontextualizes certain scenes beforehand, even in zero. Wazy was another great example of this. [spoiler] Him being part of Gralsritter actually properly explains things that were left a mystery in zero, numerous examples I can think of but the best being his knowledge of the Auction, not to mention his holy motifs most obviously. I also think his bonding event was phenomenal and I think its such a shame that such an important part of his arc was locked behind an optional bonding event [/spoiler]. Noel was also a surprising standout into Azure. Her conflict during the course of the game was very strong and I loved the [spoiler] Conversation the SSS had with Osborne and her steadfast nature during the talk [/spoiler] And I think it linked super well to the central themes. I also really really loved the [spoiler] Prison break sequence as I think it casts some humanizing light on Garcia from the first game [/spoiler]. Falcom do a really great job in creating compelling main casts but they really did a great job here. Not even mentioning how amazing the setting of Crossbell is, The place itself is very compelling and unlike in CS2, the stakes are felt here because they do such a good job of showing the pressure that the city is trapped under and you almost feel helpless about it. This is where Azure's strongest themes come from, where its about people who become so desperate to protect something that they become radicalized about it, they had some good material going where they could have put some nuance in the idea of people not being good or bad but about people who have the cities interests at heart but come to wildly different conclusions about how Crossbell can prosper. Once again I think one of the strongest ideas comes right at the end with the conversation between Lloyd and [spoiler]Guy [/spoiler] [spoiler] The notion that Lloyd could have the thing he wanted back, the thing that drove his actions and indirectly responsible for the events of the story, undoing years of grief and growth only to reject it because doing so would invalidate everything was genuinely such a good idea The problem is that I found myself connecting more with the idea than the scene. I genuinely understood what the game was trying to say but it didn't land. I think its because in Azure it suffered with this problem at parts where the concepts were great but it struggled to give them the space they needed [/spoiler] This kind of segways into the biggest issues I had with the game. The ideas were amazing, but I found the execution lacking. At some point, its like Azure had this sick fetish on just stacking on villain after villain upon twists, Like you think you have the main dude and there would just be some surprising twist that came out of left field, and killed the tension. Unlike what I would consider good twists, I didn't really find myself looking back on previous scenes with the character and situations and see them in a different light, It should have felt surprising in the moment but inevitable in retrospect Imo. But unfortunately I really really did not feel that at all. [spoiler] Mariabell [/spoiler] and especially [spoiler]Mr Grimwood [/spoiler] were genuinely the worst offenders. A recurring issue I've had is how foreshadowing is handled. Azure unfortunately pushes this criticism to the limit concerning the antagonists of the story. The problem isn't necessarily that they were villains (kind of) Its the fact that the reveals didn't feel weighted or coherent in the first place. Like both of them felt like they were given major roles as an afterthought than what their previous appearances in the story made them out to be. The former: [spoiler] The game ends with her basically being revealed to be the actual puppeteer culminating in her becoming an Anguis, which on paper is a huge plot point, and I'm assuming this will be used in future entries. The problem is I look back on the story I don't see some different character that recontextualizes stuff, I just see new information thats like Oh yeah so that happened cool. There was no setup. [/spoiler] The latter: [spoiler] This is arguably even worse, The motivations on paper make more sense (losing his family leading to radicalization or whatever although I felt this wasnt really executed well) but the reveal of him killing Lloyds brother was just something that came out of left field, and also being the puppeteer and the clue the game tries to sell is that hes a lawyer and therefore hes got connections everywhere, It didn't land and It felt like they just used a dartboard to choose the antagonists from the NPCs with portraits without bothering to make convincing buildup. [/spoiler] Theres a lot more I could say but ultimately, my issue isnt with ambition or ideas, Ive already said but I genuinely believe that it has some of the strongest potential and thematic writing in the game but the problem is for me its paired with execution that doesn't fully land for me. I still highly recommend the game. Even with the arguably bad flaws imo, the strengths are so strong and the game as a whole was crazy engaging. I sunk almost 50 hours into this in less than a week and considering 100%ing the game, which should say more about the quality of the game than any of my criticisms here.
Good finish to the Crossbell duology standing on the same highs as Trails in the sky SC. I have some gripes about the story's ending which drags it down a little bit but a great experience overall. Don't play this before the previous entries in the series.
AO NO KAMI
Carrying on from Trails from Zero I thought this would be at least good, since that game had some great bits but mostly lacking especially in it's characters. This gave the payoffs to so many of them, but I still found myself uninterested and bored, even when things heated up in the finale. Seeing older characters come back and have their arcs continued was the only thing that I really enjoyed. Like it's not super awful, the gameplay is still great and the overall story was alright but the negatives really weighed down the experience for me.
As the 5th Trails game I’ve played in a row, while I am happy to give this a solid recommendation, I have more issues with the plot and story than I have with the past four games. I will not be spoiling anything but will speak in broad terms on what my issues were in game near the end of my review. Overall, it is another great entry in the Trails franchise and I will be continuing onward into Cold Steel. Trails to Azure continues in gameplay tweaks and improvements seen in the past four games. Looking back, it does feel like an overall upward trend that I hope to see continue in Cold Steel. Graphically we have smaller updates but the colours and artwork continue to bring about this vibrant fantasy world with a distinct vision into focus. The OST continues to be some of the best in video games, tracks so memorable I remember where I was ingame when I fist heard them or which characters are associated. Still not a single bad track on the soundtrack. Which of course leads us to the main course of this franchise, the story and characters. Overall, fantastic, even with my issues. Some of the new antagonists provide genuine threats, the story beats continue to make me tear up at points, and I’m a sucker for cheesy protagonist lines about not giving up. However, the final chapter falters in a rush to up the stakes and make the discovered conspiracy more contrived. One antagonist in particular gave me Kai Leng vibes from Mass Effect 3, while the two mastermind antagonists we showdown with at the very end are simply pathetic. The plot protection around one in particular had me rolling my eyes and will hopefully not show up in the games for awhile now. Again, as a whole Trails to Azure continues to uphold the overall excellence I’ve enjoyed throughout the five games. I just wish for a game that offered such intense political stakes and shakeups for the world had a smoother ending to lead us into Cold Steel. No doubt I’ll look on many of the plot points, cast and OST fondly in the future.
I really liked this game! It takes a while to really get into the swing of things, and the Second Game Syndrome hits really hard here. Exploring the same overworld and opening the same chests again is incredibly tedious when there is very little to differentiate from the first game, outside of the story itself. The story is very good, though. You're left in the dark for such a long time until the pieces finally click, and the way its done is really cool. The motivations for the main villain is like, whatever. I don't care for the "secret twist villain" thing that this series clings to (especially after its done twice in this game) but regardless I found the way that the Main Mystery from Zero is resolved to be satisfying and good. The finale with KeA and the final few scenes were absolutely amazing and heartbreaking, I applaud them. In terms of gameplay, this one is tricky. The overall boss design is very same-y and not unique (for the most part), but there are a few standout fights that were especially good. Both of Sigmunds fights were good in seperate ways, and the same can be said about both of Arios' fights. The Arianrhod fight completely sucks because it requests you to use one specific ability (that only one character has access to) in order to counteract her gimmick of instakilling your entire team. This sucks, unfortunately, and doesn't feel like it has a place in this game due to the fact that it feels very unimmersive, especially considering it requires an amount of cheese. The fact that you aren't supposed to ACTUALLY beat her makes sense, but I still just do not like this fight. The same can be said about the Final Final Final boss, because it also has the capacity to instakill you without warning (or if there was a warning, i couldnt figure it out after 5 seperate attempts where it snuck up behind me each time). Going through the motions of doing side quests constantly is really tiring and I wish I could just skip them entirely but I can't, because they're canon. I feel as if this game's finale was too long even if I don't know how to make it shorter. It just drags a lot because it uses the same formula for the entire chapter, and the final dungeon was repetitive (even if i think it is visually stunning). I think overall the pros outweigh the cons of this game, so I can excuse my problems with the gameplay. Despite this, there is a very big elephant in the room that comes with the localization team. They reuse phrases and words so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ often that it quickly becomes grating. Reading "Haha." over and over again does something to the brain that is not good. The localization is pretty dated and uses a lot of pseudo-modern zoomer lingo (like the term "bruh moment" or "taking dubs") and it clashes with the fact this game released 10 years before it was properly translated. Still, I like the game. I hope Cold Steel is good.
[b] A miserable, mediocre mess of a RPG that lacks any originality. [/b] Pretty much everything it does it takes from another Trails game and does it way worse. Combat is actively worse than Zero: A lot of crafts have gotten slaughtered so the best strategy is just art spam outside of the few utility crafts that still hold up. Bosses are mostly immune to everything, including stat downs, and a LOT of bosses, especially in the latter half, are just purely awful experiences - way too bulky, often just one shot with their s-craft (so you better be spamming Zero Field lol) or have some annoying gimmick like vanish, whatever the hell Campanella's gimmick is called, or just teleporting you away. ♥♥♥♥ those last two fights man, especially the final boss being easy except for the random instant kill damage race at the end (you can be vanished right before it starts charging). The story, similarly to Zero, starts promising but then completely falls off at the end (though it happens way earlier in this game). Crossbell's political climate is legitimately interesting to me, but it gets dropped for the same secret society shtick and Ouroboros adding absolutely nothing to the series. Part of the problem is Falcom's complete and utter fear of actually having stakes and consequences in the Trails series - no one dies, the game just kinda ends with the "main" villain just teleporting away. Characters are good as usual but they're just a lot less present due to them trying to add a bit more to everyone. Randy is the big exception, he's very active in the story and has great moments, but everyone else, especially Elie and Tio, get massively sidelined. Noel and Wazy join but they don't really have anything going for them outside of Wazy being funny until the end game. Speaking of which, the Azure Tree is tied for the worst final dungeon so far with Sky 1's. Absolutely abysmal, even if you ignore the last two bosses and the mostly mundane and easy rest of the bosses [spoiler] (Arios' fight in the Tree was actually pretty good, that's the one exception) [/spoiler] you're left with just an absolute slog of a dungeon that fails in every regard (Just like the rest of the game!) Lastly, ♥♥♥♥ the Arianrhod fight. I do not understand how people glaze it. It sucks. This is not anywhere near the worst game, or even RPG, I've played. It's probably not even my least favorite. But it is just a miserable time and I hope this is the lowest the Trails series goes. I hate Lloyd Bannings.
YES
hell yeah
really the most incredible trails game so far
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time, reconstructed from Steam's monthly review histogram.
Engagement
DAU/MAU are modeled from peak concurrent players (≈×8 and ×28) — Steam publishes no active-user counts, so treat these as rough estimates, not reported figures.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| Zuma Deluxe | $871.5K | 6.7K | 96% | $4.99 |
| LONESTAR | $871.5K | 2.4K | 91% | $5.84 |
| The Gardens Between | $871.2K | 2.8K | 94% | $19.99 |
| Ben and Ed - Blood Party | $872K | 2.8K | 88% | $14.99 |
| VenusBlood FRONTIER International | $870.8K | 825 | 94% | $39.99 |
| Unrailed! | $870.6K | 19.6K | 93% | $2.99 |