Sid Meier's Civilization VII

烂完了，古典进探索，本来碾压对家，结果跨时代突然爆一堆兵，我大方正打追猎者差十力，怎么弄的平衡

As far as strategy games goes it is fun, but as far as the history goes, I have never seen so much miss-information, and fake history in my whole life. Don't be fooled by the propaganda, the creators of human civilization are not white skinned people, but people of color like the Chinese, who have had a civilization for literally over 5000 years. 5000 years ago Europe was a bunch of cave men. That is real history, not this Zionist bull crap this game is trying to convince people of. If you are a person of color, don't play this game because it minimizes the achievement of people of color, when white people need to change history by pretending to have accomplished things, that in reality, people of color achieved, i.e. Arabic people invented algebra when English were burning witches at the stake. Facts

Making this a free-to-play week was the smartest move the Civ VII team have made in the game's history. In the end, this game isn't as bad as a doubter like myself might have thought it was coming in, but nor is it as good as Civ 5 or 6, which are much cheaper. At least those let you play the same game all the way through. The rubberbanding ages mechanic essentially makes much of the game pointless and, even on its lightest setting, tears down much of what you built up. But that's not the problem, the game is at heart a tolerable 4X game despite that (a 4X game, not a Civ game, mind you - if you'd filed off the title screen and told me this was *Humankind II* I would have easily believed you). But what ruins it are a series of bewildering gameplay choices: beautiful but samey and indistinguishable graphics, religion mechanics that really may as well not exist for all the good they do, an AI obsessed with forward settling for border gore galore, notifications that by telling you *to* do things but not *how* to do them somehow manage to be nagging and completely unhelpful at the same time, and atrocious UI/UX communication of those choices. In particular this is the worst Civilopedia in series history when it comes to telling you how to use the things it's talking about in game. Right now this stands at about the "Humankind" tier of "4X games I might fire up once in a while if I get bored with Civ 6 or 5", and, sadly, for the price they want for this thing, that's not a good purchasing decision right now. But maybe, after some expacs and price cuts, it might be worth a shot. So yes, smart move making this a free-to-play week. It's upgraded my recommendation from "do not buy this game" to "do not buy this game yet."

Recently came back to see how the updates have played out. So far after 2 sessions I have to say this game feels good again. It is a beautiful game as well. The devs truly care about the feedback we have all given to make this a better Civ title, and the work is showing.

I mean it's fine... I like some differences to other Civ games and the game isn't bad but this game is not worth the 70€ it is listed for. I can't in good concience recommend this game at this price. Neat pickup if it's on sale. Not worth 70€.

Игра в техническом плане хороша. Однако купив полную версию предзаказом, где вроде как изначально включены все последующие длс спустя год оказывается что выходит дополнение на азию, которое уже нужно купить отдельно причём ладно бы оно стоило немного, так его цена просто сумасшедше завышена. За это ставлю жирнейший минус и говорю разработчикам что они реально зажрались, выпустить сырую игру за 100 баксов ещё понять теоретически можно, но когда за эти деньги игрок получает не весь контент, это уже перебор.

XCOM destroyed two of my playstations. Why is this the only game that makes my computer make a "death rattle." Combination of poor shaming and what the market is willing to bare. You should be ashamed.