WikiArena

Это игра как "Больше-меньше" только Wikipedia edition. В игре присутствуют русская и украинская локализация, можно с игры переходить на статьи в википедии и есть еще таблица лидеров

This became within a scant few introductory seconds the best party game/icebreaker I've ever spent a buck fifty on. Really challenging, chin-scratching, sometimes agonizing game of simple choices based on what you think other people know or care about based on what you know or care about and how much you think anyone else would know or care about that. There's vs. mode, there's a bot you can play against, there's other ways to prove you know nothing about how wikipedia works and be defeated by a random town in India that has 37 people in it because you thought more people would be into a 1973 hockey tournament result. Clutch. It's probably fun for a bit solo but if you aren't sharing the burden of doubt with someone you are really missing out on the greatest strength of this particular game which is to act as a prompt for limitless kinds of zany discussions and hilarious heated debates over the credentials of Comet Wolf (disambiguation) vs. the 1933 Australian Rugby Association.

A neat and simple little trivia game, learned some new stuff while playing so it's a winner in my book.

Great, fun little game to kill time. I highly recommend playing with friends over Discord etc. for some good laughs.

Simple idea, simple execution. The rules are clear within seconds and there is barely anything in the game to distract you from playing. I'm personally playing it for a couple of minutes per session, but I see how you can sink hour after hour into it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer_review

muy bueno y en español 10 puntos

It is exactly what uit says on the tin: a fun game for short sessions, where you see two random Wikipedia aricles and have to estimate which one is longer or has more views. Some comparisons are easier, some are completely surprising, but almost all are interesting, and if one of the articles intrigues me, the game also offers to open the article in my browser. Most of the time, both articles are about something I've never heard about and I have to work backwards from the kind of topic or the style, but that just makes it better when I do recognize an article. Either way, it's always a bit of fun, it doesn't demand a large investment into the game upfront, I can just play it for a bit and usually find something interesting in the process.

I like random trivia. This game is actually a challenge. It's a good concept and I find myself saying "one more game" more than I should.

Simple fun that's deceptively challenging. It's really fun to see the wild different things that come up sometimes from obscure scientific chemicals to architecture or sports figures from other countries. Worth the $2 for sure if you like seeing unusual articles and playing a game around them too. Wikipedia is great.