
The "trivia roguelike" where Wikipedia articles battle it out and you predict the winner! Guess the length and popularity of articles randomly pulled from Wikipedia's daily growing archive of 6.5+ million entries! Featuring arena, endless and a WikiBot duel mode, no two runs will ever be the same!
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media
About
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English, German, Spanish - Spain, Japanese, Simplified Chinese
Engagement
Hours played at review time, across 39 reviews with recorded playtime.
Reviews
超廉価、シンプル、簡単、でもとてつもなく奥深いゲームです。 僕はYoutubeLiveでチャット欄のアンケート機能を使って視聴者さんと一緒に考察したり、対決したり(1vs1モード使用)しましたが、とても盛り上がりました。 (配信については開発者の方から許可を頂きました) ソロプレイでもいい頭の体操になります。 是非周りに広めたいゲームです!
This game is the smartest twist on these type of comparison challenges I've seen to this date. Comparing wikipedia articles is really fun because you end up learning about all sorts of events, historic figures, but also biology, geography and more. Then when you see an article you're curious about you can just press a button and the game will open it up. It's great Having the two choices of betting either on the most viewed or longest article is also a really smart design choice, it brings a lot more depth to the game!
Random articles can be about cats, recommend. But cat only mode would be great
[b] **NOTE:** This review is part of my steam curator review and is the extended version. Check my steam curator page at https://store.steampowered.com/curator/39607348-Random-Game-Reviews-by-Labprofess/ . Follow appreciated! [/b] — I always thought of myself as an outlier, something that is weird for reading wikipedia articles in his free time. I have never met anyone prior with the same trait. Something about those articles always pulled me closer to them: was it the knowledge I'm gaining, the open questions I'm getting answered or just broadening my horizon regarding my interests? I never truly knew neither have I tried too. With that being said, can you believe my excitement when I found out about this game? People with the same interest as mine, reading wikipedia in their free time coming together. Turns out I'm not alone. There are other people sharing this unique hobby with me. If I ever had to imagine a wikipedia game (which prior to this, I haven't!) It would be exactly this. Two articles, side by side, and you guess which one is longer or gets more views. While this might sound boring at first, the best part is that you are able to read the introduction of these articles and open them completely if you want to. Before you know it, you are playing maybe 20% of the time and the remaining 80% you are getting distracted reading some articles. Maybe they spike your interest so much that you decide to conduct individual research on them? That's what happened to me when I got an article on NATO Tigers in one round. I was fascinated, I never heard about something like this, and before I realize it Im trying to find out where and when their next meeting takes place (Far far away in Italy). With such a unique game concept, it would be a bummer if this was limited to certain specifications (also considering its no high end one). Luckily this is not the case and I can say that any potato would be able to run this. Doesn't matter if you're using a gaming pc or a work pc. And despite that, the graphics are still crispy clean with beautiful use of color that isn't too dark or too light. To make this even better, it runs on Mac and Linux too so any gamer can appreciate it. I tried it on Mac and noticed no issues. No lag and the fan worked perfectly. Lastly, my reviews wouldn't be complete if I never decide to tell the reader whether I believe the game is worth it. Well, is it? Yes it is. No questions asked. Rarely do you find an educational game that can be fun at the same time. And by educational, I mean actually educational, not the type of “education” you get playing Call of Duty learning about the different types of guns (which are all inaccurate btw). I haven't noticed any glitches or whatsoever, and the best of all is that you can change the game's language, which also pulls articles from other wikipedia pages. You would also require an active internet connection to play this, but you need that regardless if you play on steam. With that being said, if you're still interested, go ahead and get this very unique educational fun game and spend multiple hours getting distracted while playing!
[b]ビキニ(水着) と セガ・マークⅢはどちらが閲覧数多いのか?[/b] Wikipediaに載っている記事からランダムに二つ選出し、どちらの方が記事が長いか、もしくは閲覧数が多いかを当てるゲーム。 選ばれる記事によっては簡単なものもあるが物凄く僅差なものもあって当てるのは難しい。というか知らない単語ばっかり出てくるので基本難しい。 単語はその場でwikiページに飛んで調べることも出来る。写真付きで遊ぶと気になってちょこちょこ飛んでしまう。 ゲームモードには3個のライフで10回正解を目指すモードやエンドレスモード、BOTやローカル対戦、Twitchでのネット対戦も出来る。 出てきた問題をTwitterにそのまま上げれるのは割とユニーク。 ゲーム性自体は面白いけど一人でやっていると飽きやすいのでセール時に買うのをおススメ。 [spoiler]10579 VS 5714 でビキニ(水着)の方が見られている。[/spoiler]
My friend give me a key for this game, but it looks so awesome that i had to give the key to another friend and buy this for myself. Thank you.
WikiArena ist das perfekte Spiel um festzustellen, wie wenig Allgemeinwissen man hat und überrascht wird, wie selbst die absurdesten Wikipedia-Artikel länger/beliebter sind als man denkt. Vielen Dank Mögi, dass ich wegen dir das Spiel geholt habe :D
Impressively entertaining. Always happy to find interesting new Wiki rabbit holes to go down.
Это игра как "Больше-меньше" только Wikipedia edition. В игре присутствуют русская и украинская локализация, можно с игры переходить на статьи в википедии и есть еще таблица лидеров
This is exactly what it looks like, and I enjoy it quite a bit. I could see firing this up for 10-20 minutes a few times a week for sure.
Related
Related
Trends
Concurrent players on Steam, sampled daily since tracking started.
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| XDeskClock | $1.9K | 63 | 63% | $2.99 |
| Cosmic Tempest | $1.9K | 114 | 93% | $0.49 |
| SokoPenguin | $1.9K | 76 | 97% | $1.04 |
| Hello From Darkness | $1.9K | 153 | 80% | $0.89 |
| Froggie | $1.9K | 158 | 95% | $0.69 |
| Lucid Cycle | $1.9K | 76 | 72% | $1.99 |