Subnautica: Below Zero

i Genuinely do not know why this game is so highly reviewed, its significantly worse than Subnautica 1 in pretty much every way but base building, and even that mechanic isnt nearly as useful considering that the map is entirely too small to need more than one base, which can be easily placed in the shallows. the leviathans are by and large boring, with the only one you really even need to deal with being the shadow leviathan because they hide it in completely disgusting amounts of fog in the crystal caves. the ice worm is supposed to be a scary encounter but was utterly trivialized because i just... hopped through its area in a prawn suit. i was also apparently one of only 20% of people to even bother finishing Sam and Robin's story, so thats a pretty good indicator of how much people cared about the character they were playing.

Крутяк,мені сподобалась навіть більше ніж оригінал,теж українська присутня,зображення гарне,сюжету запхано більше і гра менше займає часу. Перша теж нічого але ця має більше плюсів однозначно.Вона так само складна,без мапи тільки компас,ніхто прямо не каже куди йти що робити. Немає тупорилого циклопа яким хз як керувати і він застряє в кожному повороті,тут ця історія модульна і можна самому вибрати які відсіки потрібні.Ще плюси всякі дрібні.Хто квакає що провальна гра проглянемо статистику досягнень,першу гру пройшло всього 14% людей,цю щось біля 25. Я кайфонув, 10 витріщак з 10

If you want to play this game and you absolutely enjoyed Subnautica, you would enjoy this one too. Expect the story to be relativeley short and keep exploring (You can also speed run it but will usually less than 3-4 hours which is no fun to me). Don't listen to reddit, subnautica community isn't toxic, it's just diverse but in support for the good cause, they rawdogged hard this game that even the sound of eating food seems a problem to majority of dislikers. Yes the map is small, and you all don't like Land exploration, from a marine biology pov this game is scienticifically accurate in it's oceanographic content as much as it can be (except the Precursor elements ofc). Only wrong thing is this should have been based as a dlc (same game engine) and not as a standalone game, which i understand that they wanted to graphically enhance this game more from first one. And trust me, graphically this game is more beautiful than first. Final things should be that in-game story, find about what happened to Sam, cure the ancient kharaa mutated cells and then focus on main story. Subnautica devs are anything but not a disappointment to the lore and gameplay. Respect for that. Hope the community also sorts out this no kill policy in subnautica 2 since it has no purpose neither here nor in og (except vitality which i am sure can also be done in other ways). Also please don't put penglings in bioreactor, don't do thiss... EDIT: Just discovered trivalve eggs after finishing the game, they are very much unique less cute but smarter than cuddlefish lol YOU CAN ALSO IGNORE the every month controversy about how the pda has an indian accent, the devs specifically said that when they were making the game, the indian accent simply symbolizes technology,ceoism and megacorporation. But the last thing we need is people whining about a survival guide's voice accent every once in a while. I wonder if Weyland-Yutani can fill their perfect accent hunger stomachs with good space exploration survival guides.

I went in blindly, didn't even look at reviews, and completed the game 100%, just because I wanted to form my own opinions... and it was an awful experience. Awful writing, bland and forgettable music, and unforgivably awful and boring world design. All spoilers are marked as hidden below. [list] [*]The studio is located in California and carries extremely toxic politics into the writing. [*]Their writing is full of tedious, awful "millennial writing", meaning heavy sarcasm and stupid jokes which makes all the characters feel Californian, instead of feeling real/serious. [*]The writing is FULL of political preaching and trite snark, instead of any actual wit or clever insights. [*]The PDA (computer/databank device) in the game literally has an Indian accent. Why? None of the other characters in the game have that accent, so why does the computer have an Indian accent? It makes no sense and is just more forced, jarring political pandering. [*]When you build a Control Room for your base, you get this gem of Californian Millenial political writing: "PDA: In the control room, you can change base lighting and colors, rename your base, and see information about power and structural integrity. But not the integrity of [b]societal power structures[/b]." That kind of toxic writing is rooted in hatred and a woeful inability to understand complex history (and everything they're supposedly rallying against still goes on TODAY in the countries they cherish, like the Middle East and Africa, where slavery, racism and misogyny is rampant in every country). [*]They also crammed in a [spoiler]lesbian biracial relationship[/spoiler] just to really hammer home the "societal power structures" message that the game is about. [*][b]This shows that the writers didn't understand that this is a sci-fi game set in space in the future, and NOT their personal Tumblr blog.[/b] [*]Therefore we shouldn't be surprised that they hamfisted the main characters; the sisters (Sam & Robin) and [spoiler]Marguerit[/spoiler], as "three strong, black/mixed female heroes". Even though it was clear that [spoiler]Marguerit died in the first game, and that it makes ZERO sense that Marguerit is now back and "somehow crawled into the Reaper Leviathan from Subnautica 1 and lived for weeks inside the rotting carcass while it floated to the north pole to bring her into the new game".[/spoiler] It's ridiculous, very heavy-handed and awfully forced. [*]I don't even really mind the BIPOC sisters or [spoiler]the lesbian relationship[/spoiler], and I don't mind that all the heroes are people of color, because unlike the creators of this game, I don't see everything through racist and sexist eyes. All I care about is believable writing, and I really drew the line at [spoiler]Marguerit[/spoiler]. Their political self-insert became so heavy-handed that they made up a ridiculous, unrealistic story just to [spoiler]resurrect Marguerit in the new game[/spoiler], to get one more "female fist against the patriarchy" into the game. That's all it was. She was just another token character for the writer's heavy-handed messaging, and that kind of painfully weak writing poisons and weakens the entire game. [*]The story about the sister is absolutely ridiculous too. [spoiler]Turns out your sister is an idiot who "girl bosses" to "fight the evil corporation she's working for" and blows everything up to stop the scientific research on the planet, thus getting everyone (including herself) killed. Then it turns out the "evil corporation" was actually working on cures for diseases and was actually working on something good for humanity, and your sister was just stupid and everything she did was all pointless and harmful. The game frames her as a noble hero anyway.[/spoiler] I can only assume that this major story flaw is a result of the game changing writers/story direction about 3 times during production. [*]But the awful writing was just the cherry on top of Below Zero's pile of junk for me, because the game design itself is already absolutely terrible compared to Subnautica 1 all on its own. Everywhere you go, there's just snow and ice and identical looking, repetitive water biomes. The glacial tundra biome (on land) is awful and is a huge maze of wasted time, with constant freezing and snowstorms and fog making navigation in the white ice extremely tedious. Most of the time you're just staring at heavy, white fog without being able to see anything. The story is told so poorly and the "glacial tundra" map is so massive and maze-like that you'd need incredible patience to actually find [spoiler]Sam's secret stash[/spoiler] required for beating the game. By that point, I was so bored with the game's awfully designed, repetitive maps that I just looked up a video on how to find the key locations in the tundra. [*]Another huge issue with Below Zero is how hidden the entrances are for [spoiler]Outpost Zero (hugging the glacier wall until you find it underwater northeast of the starting area)[/spoiler] and the [spoiler]Al-an Architect Storage[/spoiler] cave. The reason why [spoiler]Outpost Zero[/spoiler] is so hidden is just poor game design: It USED to be the SPAWN POINT for the game, but they changed it without adding any hints about how to get there, so you can run around blindly in the glacial tundra for hours if you don't look it up. Even though you get a map marker for it later in the game, there's no indication whatsoever that you need to get there via the water as opposed to the tundra you've been repeatedly visiting in that area before then. As for the [spoiler]alien storage cave[/spoiler] entrance you're supposed to find at the start of the game, it's barely visible and is faaar away from the distress signal map marker, so after looking for 30 minutes at the start of the game, I just went on with other stuff, and I had played for 15 hours before I finally [spoiler]met Al-An in the cave and discovered that he's[/spoiler] vital for the exploration of the game. So I went through most of the game blind (and annoyed), not knowing that you were supposed to go there first to make the rest of the game make sense. I looked it up and saw that lots of people had ended up in the same situation. Either way, most of Below Zero was just tedious "go down deep and look blindly in very specific spots whose nearly invisible entrances are hundreds of meters away from the destination waypoint". [spoiler]Even having Al-an wouldn't have helped much since he just hints that something is nearby but usually doesn't mark it[/spoiler]. The game design in Below Zero is fundamentally awful. [*]The music of Below Zero is bland and boring too. Which, funnily enough, is a result of the company owner firing the original, genius Subnautica 1 music producer, because he disagreed with them about politics. For example, they were celebrating political assassinations. That's how intolerant they are. Therefore it's no surprise that Below Zero's writing is a heavily-political, awful mess. [*]With Subnautica 1, the world design was amazing, with logical biomes and a free exploration feeling where you would constantly run into progression milestones just by visiting the biomes. I felt a constant sense of awe and exploration with so many beautiful, varied biomes and so many interesting wrecks. Sure, the story in SN1 was pretty thin and the voice acting in its PDA entries was so bad that I always muted them and read the text instead. But at least that game had a large, gorgeous world to explore with so much interesting content. In comparison, Below Zero felt like a boring, repetitive chore where everything looked and felt identical, and you had to find tiny cave entrances to progress the preachy, political story. I wish I could refund Below Zero. But at least Subnautica 1 is a masterpiece that I have replayed many times. [*]Subnautica: 9/10. Below Zero: 3/10 (only because it's still "more Subnautica" for those who crave more, but yikes is it BAD!). [/list]

[h1] Different Doesn't Mean Bad [/h1] You've likely heard a lot of negative things about Below Zero just by scanning the reviews. I'm here to tell you that, while yes, it wasn't the EXACT same experience as Subnautica 1, it was a refreshing take on the game, and I did enjoy it. Different isn't always this awful thing we need to completely avoid trying. While I don't think it beat the original game, if you found Subnautica to be amazing, I wouldn't pass up the chance to play this game just because it couldn't live up to the incredibly high expectations the original game had set for it. While it does fall short on giving you the same terrifying, vulnerable feeling that the open waters of Subnautica 1 does, it shines in other ways. For instance, it expands upon base building and adds many quality of life features that the original game lacked. It emphasizes exploration and discovery over the feeling of being in constant danger. Despite often being considered a let down, Below Zero still has a beautiful soundtrack and entrancing biomes much like the first game. I hope you can put aside the high bar Subnautica 1 might have placed on Below Zero, because it has a lot to offer.

This is a hard game for me to review. If I could leave a sideways thumb instead of a thumbs up or thumbs down then that is what I would choose. If you played Subnautica and loved it, you will likely at best only like this title. If you played Subnautica and hated it, don't buy this game, it is worse by just about every metric. If you haven't played Subnautica at all, then play it first and choose one of the options above. Subnautica is a fantastic game that really stands out as being unique in the gaming world to this day despite its original early access release now being 12 years ago. If you decide to buy this game, wait for a sale. It is not worth the asking price in my opinion. With all this being said, I'm going to say what I liked about this game and follow it up with what I did not like about this game. The things I liked: I like the SeaTruck and the ability to customize the vehicle through this game's inclusion of modules. This, to me, was a very cool feature that is not in the original Subnautica and that I hope it makes it into Subnautica 2. My one complaint about the system being that I never found all of the fragments for all of the modules before I 100%'ed the game. I wish it had been a little more straightforward to find all of the pieces so I could make my dream SeaTruck. I liked the information we gained about the Architect race of aliens introduced in the original title. I will avoid going into detail here to avoid spoiling too much about the game's storyline and what we learn. Either way, loved getting to learn more about them and this particular part of the story of Below Zero. I liked the new base building additions and found it just as fun to build a base in this game as in the original Subnautica barring the lackluster environments present in Below Zero. What I didn't like: The above water sections. This game is not named Supernautica, it is Subnautica. It is not named SuperTerrica either. An amount of land exploration is acceptable and I enjoyed the above water sections in Subnautica because they were very interesting, small, and packed full of loot, fragments for fabricating new gear and base pieces, and story reveals. In Below Zero, everything on land looks the same, there are vast areas with virtually nothing in them, and I manage to explore the entire area and 100% the game without running into the new major enemy that is supposed to dominate the surface area of this game. Even with the new land exploration vehicle, it just wasn't exciting. The Snowfox, the new vehicle, wasn't particularly fun to pilot either. It suffered from one of the same thing that plagues every vehicle in this game and the player as well. It is too f*@($!% slow. Why are the vehicles so slow in this game? Because the map is a literal fraction of a fraction the size of the original Subnautica map. They made you slower to make the map feel bigger. It did not work. I was painfully aware of how small the map was my entire playthrough, and I was still slow as a slug. It was painful and not fun. It made the game less enjoyable. Please do not try this again Unknown Worlds. Please. I still do not understand how this game costs the same as the original Subnautica despite only adding a few things, presenting a new story line, while being an objectively smaller and worse game than the original Subnautica. It would be far easier to recommend this game and forgive some flaws if it was the cost of a DLC expansion and not a full title. I did not particularly enjoy the story of this game and the way it is told to the player is just actually awful. Despite having only visited half of the human base locations on the map, I had already gotten to the ending of the story line while missing nearly half of the story. This made uncovering the rest of the story rather boring as it became extremely predictable since I already knew how the story ended. You can just find all of the story information at any time and in any order in which you just happen to happen upon it. The original Subnautica did this as well, but the way they used crush depths meant you were almost certainly going to find the story in the correct order unless you were really going out of your way to miss the story line. It was just a better way of doing this kind of story telling. The ambiance of this game was another thing that was disappointing. Part of what and I and many other players really enjoyed about the original Subnautica was this feeling of being truly stranded on 4546B. You felt alone, you felt isolated. You felt like at any moment some new previously unknown monster that would rival the dinosaurs may burst out of the murky depths and drag you to a watery grave. That feeling is mostly gone from this game. Barring one particular creature that I ran into in my final hour of play time, even the biggest creature was pretty lackluster and few in number. I was no longer scared to travel places beyond the first hour of game play and this killed a lot of the tension and feeling that was very present in the original Subnautica. The addition of human characters on the planet made this worse as you were not even isolated at all any more. People outside of 4546B knew you were there and there were people to meet on 4546B as well. This part is extremely subjective, but it seems most players agree with me: the biomes in Below Zero are just not as good. The exploration is not as good as a result of this. The world just is not very excited to discover like it was in the original Subnautica. Below Zero just fails to capture the feeling the original Subnautica had. If you actually read this, thanks for reading. I have comments turned on, let me know if you agree or disagree. I can truly say I only enjoyed half or less of my play time in this game and mostly completed it to be fully caught up on the Subnautica world for the launch of Subnautica 2. I am very excited to see what they learned from this when Subnautica 2 reaches its full release date once its Early Access is over. Happy diving!

"전작이 심해 공포 생존물이었다면 이번 공포는 길 찾기지만, 더 예뻐진 맵과 주크박스 덕분에 힐링 탐험용으로는 만족스럽다."

游戏公司的管理层都是左白傻福 虽然，这是一个无人竞争的蓝海，可以继续深挖的地方还有很多，比如说： 载具的姿态仪，显示俯仰、滚转、偏航角度； 把潜深加固模块改成用载具仓进行升级改造； 超大型的潮汐、波浪、风力、太阳能光热发电机； 人力地面、水下的矿场、农场、牧场、动物园、实验室； 大型扫描塔进行长时间扫描，可以得到包含全图的地形、温度、矿物、动物、植物、蓝图、外星人遗迹、大型利维坦数据的3D地图； 根据3D地图工作的三维AR导航仪； ai控制机器人自动采集矿物、扫描蓝图； 超大型矿场、农场、牧场，相应的自动采集捕获宰杀、物流运输、工农业生产管理体系； 能在海面部署的移动补给站，通过超长的脐带缆绳给玩家提供氧气和电力补给，让人可以长时间在水下作业； 和独眼巨人一样防御力超强，可以自己DIY内设，充当移动基地的水下列车； 对损坏废弃的基地进行维修复原； 野外架设科研设施收集科学数据； 随身携带的小型太阳能、洋流发电机，过滤净水器，电解制氧器，鱼类诱饵； 兼容头盔的探照灯和夜视仪： 小型穿梭机给空间站和飞船提供补给和维修： 可以救回的在玩家基地提供后勤科研辅助和情绪价值的帅哥/美女NPC； 和异性NPC互动恋爱甚至结婚生子： 游戏结局造出艾安躯体以后，告知海皇孵化酶配方满足夙愿，提供大量资源帮助维修外星人基地设施。换取空间传送门、外星人大炮、裂空者设施的部分管理权。 弄几个裂空者当保镖出门转转，有危险让裂空者大战利维坦。 等等，提高游戏体验和用户粘性的方法还有很多，没有任何技术上管理上的难题。 想要倡导爱与和平、自然保护的理念。 明明可以像《阿凡达》那样，玩家杀戮过重会引发全图利维坦参观玩家基地，反过来玩家保护救助动物可以在巢穴，得到脱落皮毛、珍稀矿石、可以和动物幼崽互动。 用潜移默化的方式引导玩家保护动物，爱护自然环境。 但是，游戏公司偏偏选择恶心玩家： 一代没有武器只有生存匕首，玩家自行摸索出的毒气鱼+凝滞枪，删掉； 推开利维坦和危险动物的斥力炮，删掉； 建造基地和码头的神器地形枪，删掉： 移动基地独眼巨人，删掉； 一个利维坦竟然能土遁； 游戏公司管理层赚了几个臭钱，就想当玩家大爹，通过恶心玩家来满足自己扭曲的控制欲。 人花钱玩游戏是为了娱乐放松、体验自然环境、舒缓工作一天紧绷的神经，不是为了当NPC受窝囊气。 女权、白左入脑没有商业精神和服务意识的傻福公司，祝早日破产倒闭！ 管理层祝早日流落街头当流浪汉！

[h1] 美丽水世界的新天地:来自极圈环境的海洋之旅 [/h1] [h3] 个人评测基于ns版与steam版 [/h3] 大家好呀，说起来《深海迷航》的评测我写了大概有2两篇了，1代和2代我自己玩的时间都不少，唯独这个零度之下时间稍次一点，我个人也是趁着前不久的夏促对前两部进行了steam的补票，也是玩了一段时间。 作为《深海迷航1》的续作，《零度之下》继续采用水下探索、生存建造与剧情调查相结合的玩法。我们将来到4546B星球的极地地区，扮演寻找失踪姐姐真相的科学家罗宾。这是一场调查事故的旅程；实际上，本作真正吸引人的，仍然是那种从一无所有开始，逐渐征服陌生海洋的过程。 [h2] 依旧是熟悉的探索 [/h2] 本作的玩法与1代类似，首先模式多样，新手玩家可以玩创造模式熟悉环境。本作融合了生存探索以及基建建造，玩法比较多样。 游戏初期，我们只有极其有限的装备。没有载具，没有基地，氧气瓶容量也十分有限。每次潜入水下，都必须计算剩余氧气、距离和返程路线。为了寻找铜矿、钛矿和石英等，我们需要反复潜入浅海洞穴。一旦对地形判断失误，或因为贪心多采了一块矿石，就可能在距离水面只有几米的位置耗尽氧气。 随着装备升级，玩家能够制造更大的氧气瓶、潜水推进器、切割工具和扫描设备，原本无法进入的区域也会逐渐开放。游戏的成长并不主要依靠角色等级，而是依靠知识、蓝图和工具。玩家每获得一项新技术，世界都会随之扩大一圈。《零度之下》的主要玩法循环十分明确：探索环境、扫描残骸、收集资源、制造装备，再前往更危险的区域。 玩家在海底发现废弃设备或技术碎片后，可以使用扫描仪解析蓝图。部分重要设备需要扫描多个碎片才能解锁，这会鼓励玩家主动离开安全区域，寻找失事基地、沉船残骸和隐藏洞穴。制造系统本身并不复杂，但资源之间存在明显的层级关系。前期常见的钛和铜，中后期会逐渐被铅、锂、镍和晶状硫等稀有材料取代。为了制造高级装备，玩家必须进入更深、更暗，也更危险的生态区域。 海陆结合也带来了更多变化，与前作相比，《零度之下》显著增加了陆地探索内容。玩家不仅要潜入海底，还需要穿越冰原、雪山、洞穴和废弃研究设施。在陆地上，氧气不再是主要问题，体温则成为新的生存压力。暴风雪会快速降低角色温度，玩家需要寻找洞穴、温泉、建筑物或能够提供热量的植物暂时避寒。 后期咱们还可以驾驶雪地摩托探索冰原。不过，陆地部分的实际体验不如水下探索自然。复杂的冰川地形、相似的道路和较低的能见度，经常让我们会难以判断方向。雪地摩托虽然速度很快，但操控略显笨重，遇到崎岖地形时容易卡住或碰撞。 但这些陆地区域确实扩大了游戏规模，也增加了玩法变化，但它们缺少水下世界那种立体、自由和充满未知感的探索体验。很多时候，陆地行动更像是在寻找正确路线，而不是发现一个真正令人惊叹的新世界。 [h2] 基地建造与生存 [/h2] 基地建造是本作最容易让我们投入大量时间的系统之一。咱们可以在海底或陆地上放置地基、走廊、房间、观察窗、储物柜、种植区和能源设备。基地既是生存据点，也是玩家在陌生星球上建立安全感的重要方式。 一开始，基地可能只是一间拥有制造器和几排储物柜的小房间。随着资源增加，它会逐渐扩建成拥有卧室、温室、扫描室、载具平台和观景区域的完整设施。比如扫描室能够搜索附近的矿物和资源，大幅减少中后期寻找材料的时间。玩家还可以安装摄影无人机观察周围环境，为深海探索提供帮助。 建造系统并没有强迫我们追求效率，可以主打美观。本作的生物设计依旧兼具美感与压迫感，生态环境与1代还是有不少差别的，魄狙极地的特点。浅海区域色彩明亮，植物和小型生物给人一种奇异却温和的感觉。随着深度增加，环境逐渐变暗，生物体型也越来越夸张。与1代不同，本作的海平面大部分被冰面覆盖，某些区域甚至只能依靠荧光植物和载具灯光辨认道路。 不过，与前作相比，本作在地图上规模确实更紧凑，大型生物带来的震撼感也不错。在生存模式下，我们除了需要管理氧气，还要处理饥饿和口渴。海洋中的部分小型生物可以被捕捉并加工成食物，某些鱼类则可以制造饮用水。玩家也能通过种植植物和建造室内农场，建立更加稳定的食物来源。 前期缺少储存手段时，食物容易腐坏，玩家必须根据出行时间决定携带多少补给。中后期获得保温箱、种植设施和净水设备后，生存压力才会逐渐降低。本作还增加了体温系统。当玩家在陆地冰原和暴风雪中活动时，体温会不断下降。角色需要寻找洞穴、温泉、建筑物和发热植物恢复温度，与1代相比还是做出了不少不同性的。 [h2] 结语 [/h2] 《深海迷航》的玩法其实还是比较适合我个人的，大家玩过应该也能体会到游戏内的很多机制实质上都是服务于实际的探索，且《零度之下》的许多方面也做出了和初代不同的地方，个人建议玩的话结合1代玩，惊喜还是蛮多的，游戏的优化，适配也特别好，安利一波。 [h1][quote=] [table] [tr] [th] 欢迎关注 [b][u][i]U_U鉴赏家培养计划[/i][/u][/b][/th] [/tr] [tr] [th] 关注U_U鉴赏家，开启精彩游戏之旅。 [/th] [/tr] [/table] [/quote][/h1]

Spielerführung am Poppes! Wer Subnautica kennt, wird in Below Zero alles wieder finden, was er / sie eh schon kennt, liebt und/oder hasst. Ich hab Subnautica damals nach 3/4 des Spiels abgebrochen, weil der Grind zu hoch, die Spielerführung übelst schlecht und der Payback-Value des Storytellings für'n Garten war ("Hier biddööööö - noch ne PDA zum Lesen!" - "Ja, wie lame, Digga!") Und macht's der Nachfolger anders? Anfangs dachte ich ja - aber dann stellten sich wieder dieselben Probleme in einer kompakteren Welt mit einigen anderen Fokussen ein. Wir sind jetzt in einer Eiswelt - im Wasser sind wir fein, aber an der frischen Luft erfrieren wir langsam. Dagegen helfen natürlich wieder Crafting-Resultate wie Anzüge oder Fahrzeuge. Okay. Aber leider sind gerade auch die Landabschnitte immer nur dann interessant, wenn Zivilisationsrückstände zu sehen sind. Sobald es in die Eisberglandschaft geht, sieht ALLES gleich aus und besteht aus einem wilden Labyrinth, in dem sich keiner zurecht findet. Dazu kriegt ihr - wie auch seit jeher - nur hin und wieder, teilweise super ungenaue Marker spendiert. In der Regel müsst ihr aber selbst suchen und Dinge selber finden. Und Crafting-Materials ebenso. Macht euch bereit Guides zu wälzen und YT-Videos GENAUESTENS zu folgen, weil das komplexe Underwater-Netz der Tiefe krass verwirrend sein kann. Die geheime Basis nahe der letzten Location der Pilotin? Keine Ahnung. Muss mit Guide hin und einen Marker selbst platzieren, weil ich sonst einfach lost bin. Es gibt KEINEN Modus, wo du dich führen lassen kannst. Es wirkt einfach wie schon immer bei EA-Games: Kein Publisher der Welt würde so eine katastrophale Spielerführung durchwinken, aber die tryhard-Fans der ersten Stunde feiern es natürlich und rühmen sich teilweise "selbst alles herausgefunden zu haben". Ja komm, erzähl deiner Mama wie geil du warst und lass dir ein Bienchen in dein Hausaufgabenheft stempeln - und dann zieh wieder ab, du Nervensäge. Es ist immer das Gleiche mit diesen Fanboys... Das Spiel fühlt sich so an als wäre seit "EA-Start" und "finaler Release" im Code nichts weiter passiert als dass ganz viel Zeit in Micro-Tweaks verschwendet wurde - bei vielen EA-Releases, wo man das Endprodukt VS investierte Programmierzeit VS Unterschiede damals/heute vergleicht, muss es ähnlich aussehen. Und sie hätten definitiv aus Teil 1 lernen können - haben sie bspw. auch mit der "Seebahn". Es gibt kein übertrieben großes Uboot mehr und auch keine kleine Knutschkugel, sondern ein modular erweiterbares Tauchboot. Super! Oder es gibt Unterwasser-Pflanzen, die einem Luft geben - super! Aber Waypoint-Marker? Oder eine vernünftig erzählte Geschichte, die nicht aus wilden losen Ereignissen besteht? Ein menschlicher Main Char wurde kurz eingeführt - und dann nach Zeitpunkt X nie wieder gesehen. Dafür dominiert ALAN. Whot? Warum krieg ich nicht Sidequests per Funk und Marker rein, die mich auf ALLE interessanten Orte hinweisen? Warum gibt's so wenig environmental storytelling? PDAs erzählen wie bisher die gesamte Story. Das ist so als würde ich in eine PowerPoint sämtliche Folien mit Text zukleistern und dann während meiner Präsi alles nur stumpf vorlesen. Guter Text, vllt - aber Präsi? Superkrass durchgefallen! Ich hab noch Bock auf Subnautica 2, weil's halt COOP ist - aber da hatte ja Grounded damals MEHR interessant gemachte Umgebungen, auch wenn dort ein ähnliches Problem vorherrschte: Survival-Gaming ohne wirkliches Fleisch, sondern nur mit einer sehr vereinfachten Hülle. Und ja - die Unterwasser-Welt ist wieder mal toll gemacht und magisch. Aber ohne Guides hätte ich nach 2h schon ausgemacht. Und am Ende fragst du Leser dich: Warum zur Hölle dann hier trotzdem ein Daumen hoch? Weil die Unterwasser-Welt trotzdem faszinierend designt ist, das Spiel extrem gut von der Hand geht und die Entdeckung dennoch ihren Reiz hat. Und dann irgendwie dieser "jetzt hab ich schon investiert"-Effekt dazu kommt. Man fuchst sich halt rein. Und das kompaktere Weltenformat hat zumindest hier dazu geführt, dass ich's auch komplett durchspiele anstatt irgendwann cancele.