If you compare with the classic FNAF games (1-7), it's the second worst FNAF game ever, why? I'll say it, the strongest parts about FNAF 3 is the ambience (with scar of abandoned), the story, which is nice and great, how to don't like[spoiler]the victms, the Willian Afton and the Springtrap? (I'm not taking about the attitudes and/or decisions of them, which are heavy).[/spoiler]And the secret minigames (optional, but better than forced ones in FNAF 2 and FNAF 4, even though they're great too), the rest that are the most important, the gameplay itself, well... Or is too easy (the 6 nights because if you're a little decent player, you die some times), or is too hard (Agressive Mode/Night), so much when I try to pass the Agressive Mode, I just passed it because Springtrap decides to be a friend and let me call it almost finely and close the vent where it was, the biggest detail is all the half of my hours of playing (10 hours) was trying to pass the Agressive Night.
The mechanics ideas are great, but "bad" executed, since there's nothing in the mechanics that makes you feel it isn't boring or annoying after some attempts to play the FNAF3, so why Scott didn't make 2 modes of the audio for example? This is the FNAF that the mechanics could be so dynamic and enjoyable compared to the 4 first FNAF's, but isn't.
Finally, the jumpscares, uh....? The weakest zombie screaming? Are you serious? It just scares if you are too distracted or if you volume up too much the audio device
Conclusion: Not worthy the money, could be little more cheaper (yes, I'm not crazy), if you spend the money of the FNAF 3, you spend at same level like FNAF 2, 4 or 5 too, which one of these at least are way better than FNAF 3, so someone say to the Scott the Springtrap is screaming for a remake urgently?
