End of War 1945

希望可以出中文,画面还是有点不好

yes its fun

End of War 1945 is a long-in-early-access FPS arena shooter with a strong multiplayer focus. Gameplay consists of routine PvP arena FPS shooting on smallish maps with an array of WW2 weapons. The game failed, with a peak player count of only 12, 2 years ago. Ouch. The game is buggy and unstable, and performed a CTD on launch. This late in the early access phase (the developer indicated early access would be complete roughly 1.5 years after entering early access), that's a very bad sign. There's no players, but you can do botmatching, if you can get the game to run. Developers must learn that other players are not an acceptable substitute for content. Very few PvP only games "go viral" and succeed despite not having any content. Releasing a PvP only game with no content in Early Access almost always results in failure as players don't stick around to see if it gets any better, as is certainly the case here. Now we get onto the real issues with this game (apart from it being dead, buggy/unlaunchable and multiplayer only). Given the shoddy state of the game despite it imminently reaching the developers commitment to leave early access around the time of this review, it seems clear there's no definite path to publication/completion, so it's on the border of being in development hell. Despite this, the developer took the unethical route of selling keys to this incomplete game so it can be sold in IndieGala bundles as a complete game. That's a distinctly unethical action as it misleads gamers, and time and time again, I have seen this used as an exit strategy from developers who know they will never finish a game, so they want to extract as much as they can before abandoning it, taking the money, and running for the hills. That may or may not be the case here, as the game did get a recent, rather shallow patch. The way the game was sold as a complete game to bundle sellers, as well as the other problems, should be enough of a warning to deter anyone from buying this. If you do really want to play a WW2 multiplayer FPS... the developer has priced this unplayable wreck at [i]a higher price[/i] than you can get Battlefield V for. [quote][url=https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/store/reviews]Developer Response![/url][/quote] The developer has weighed in to inform everyone they didn't read the [url=https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/store/reviews]Developer Usage Rules[/url] for Steam "partners", or they deliberately ignored the part where Valve says: [quote]Though it may be tempting, not every review needs to be responded to. A developer response will frequently draw more attention than the original statement, potentially turning a small issue into a much larger community discussion. It's also not a good idea to use this feature to refute customer opinions. Your direct attention can be seen as validation or a defensive attempt to silence your customers.[/quote] The developer had posted an angry, ranting tirade, which I've archived for future reference, although out of respect to a developer who quite simply does not deserve respect after insulting me in an attempt to quash a valid, informative review, I won't link it here, and I've removed my somewhat lengthy response, yet it remains completely unacceptable for developers to try to silence reviews with dishonest rants. The developer now accuses me of trolling after he sold keys for his dead game to IndieGala as a cash grab. With over 5,000 reviews, I don't troll. My reviews are to inform gamers, which my review here accomplishes. It's true many reviews are negative, but in every single case I explain clearly why those games aren't good enough for gamers who deserve only the best. And when I do find a game that is truly exceptional, that should be played by people who would enjoy it, I give that game my recommendation. The developer claims I'm trolling, baiting developers to get community awards and "likes". This is absurd, why would members of the community award trolls? With the sheer number of reviews I've written to inform gamers about the thousands of games on Steam, it's preposterous to suggest my reviews aren't genuine. Accusing people of trolling is insulting and disrespectful, but as the developers previous tirade shows, respect for paying customers is not a priority. The developer simply cannot seem to grasp the truth, End of War 1945 is an objectively bad, dead game, that at its very height, reached only 12 simultaneous players... enough to fill one map. It's dead before it even had a chance to leave early access. It's not healthy to become angry when confronted with the truth, but that is what has happened here. It's absolutely unethical to sell game keys for an incomplete, dead game to game bundle sellers with full knowledge it will be sold as a complete game. Misleading gamers and acting in bad faith is the epitome of unethical behaviour, and it's absolutely taken place here. The developer does not deny that the game is in Early Access, and in fact acknowledged there are no players, and this fact is supported by SteamDB. End of War 1945 is a multiplayer game with no players. Therefore, it is dead. The developer also doesn't deny knowing this and yet persisted in selling keys to IndieGala as if this was a complete game. Sure, IndieGala are also to blame for placing those keys into game bundles, but they wouldn't do this if the developer had taken the ethical route of not selling off those keys as a greedy cash grab. The developer once more claims my review contains false information. It does not. The developer is angry about me informing gamers that End of War 1945 contains no content, which is true. Other players aren't content, and even if they were, there aren't any here. That leaves a few game assets including 9 empty maps, none of which count as compelling interactive content that gamers can progress through. Nothing in my review is "false" or misleading, and everything can be backed up with factual reference. It doesn't take more that 0.1 of an hour to determine a multiplayer game has no players, and no genuine single player mode apart from botmatching, as I mentioned in my review. Does the developer think reviewers should sit in an empty lobby for four hours before making that determination? It's immediately obvious. The developer asks people to judge this game by other reviews... some of which are harsher than my own, more neutral and factual review. There's a few participation trophy reviews, but these are not informative or accurate about the state of the game, and some contain falsehoods about the game... the same thing the developer accuses me of, but for real! One of them gives the game a thumbs up, despite complaining that there's no players in the game! How valuable is that review? Not at all. No wonder the developer wants people to use those misleading reviews. My review stands by the factual information contained therein. Angry rants and tirades from an unethical developer do nothing to change the fact that this dead game simply cannot be recommended to anyone.

um divertido jogo de guerra!!! indico muito para jogar em server com amigos...o game apresenta uma boa mecânica de fps, embora esteja bem cru graficamente e com alguns bugs na mira! sehue o link da avaliação feita em live https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq1aWcSfdWCPbprYYxC_FOA?view_as=subscriber

A good game! that is still in development would be nice if more were to play online, so a game can develop.

this is a fun game the ai is alright the animations are not great but it has fun gameplay

Very good game since we are talking of a BETA version, the developers are constantly updating and are keen to suggestions from the community. DEFINETLY WORTH BUYING AND TRYING

Man könnte etwas aus diesem Spiel machen, aber ich muss sagen da hat Call of Duty 2 mehr Potenzial. Ich sehe hier zu wenig Fortschritte. Es muss einfach eine Menge verbessert werden. Die AI läuft fast in einer Reihe..... sowie keiner nach einem Headshoot umkippt.....egal mit was für einer Waffe und das kann es nicht sein 3mal auf den Kopf treffen zu müssen damit sie endlich umkippen. Server habe ich noch nie gefunden....also wird dieses Game nun einstauben xD

Игра, которая напоминает что-то олдскульное, родное, но в интересном субсеттинге конца войны с малоизвестными битвами. Что можно сказать про сабж? В нем есть синглплеер (пока что без кампании) и мультиплеер (пока что без людей). У каждой карты есть историческая справка, в игре несколько режимов. Разработчик имеет планы на множество контента и постепенно его добавляет, что радует. Из минусов: всё еще достаточно глупые боты, наползающий сам на себя интерфейс в некоторых местах (меню, очки поебды), по крайней мере на 1920x1200 экране, хз. Но радует, конечно, интерес именно к чему-то неосвещенному в ВМВ у разработчика, явно знающего историю глубже, чем на уровне обычных игр про Вторую мировую. Пишу этот отзыв поскольку интересна тематика игры и хочется увидеть развитие идеи, а оно по словам разраба будет.

好玩