Call of Duty®: Advanced Warfare - Gold Edition

Always loved this game, maybe even my favourite. But this is only worth buying when it's on sale, as continuing to charge $50 for this is absurd. It's a good looking game don't get me wrong, with decent graphics and a good story, but the game play is definitely on the clunkier side and there's not even an FOV Slider, meaning unless you can put up with the terrible default FOV you're gonna have to tweak the config file, which isn't hard, simply put "seta cg_fov "your desired fov here" "and it'll work, but you're gonna have to do that before you boot the game every time, because it seems to reset after you close it down. Oh and campaign is really the only sell able thing here, as the multiplayer is completely dead, so unless you can drag friends on to do a private lobby, or you're fine with going against brainless bots (or solo in the case of Zombies), you're not getting much gameplay out of that. I'd be willing to give this a thumbs up if they lowered the price to someting reasonable and added an FOV slider, but that's never going to happen.

义父给你机械臂，你给义父扔楼下

Me da igual lo que piense la gente, para mi la campaña de AW es sin duda la mejor de todos los CoD. Es simplemente perfecta.

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare stands out as one of the most refreshing and innovative entries in the Call of Duty franchise, and when compared to Battlefield 6, it offers a unique, fast-paced, and futuristic gameplay experience that Battlefield simply can’t match. Advanced Warfare’s defining feature its exosuit movement completely changes the flow of combat. Boost jumps, dashes, and vertical mobility give every firefight a dynamic intensity that feels far more energetic and skill-driven than Battlefield 6’s grounded, vehicle-focused style. While Battlefield emphasizes massive maps and slower tactical engagements, Advanced Warfare delivers rapid combat encounters where personal movement, reaction time, and mechanical skill truly shine. One of the biggest strengths of Advanced Warfare is how consistent and player-focused the gameplay feels. In Battlefield 6, matches can feel dependent on team coordination, vehicle control, or long travel times across oversized maps. Advanced Warfare keeps the action tight and immediate. You’re constantly in combat, constantly making decisions, and constantly influencing the outcome. The smaller, well-designed maps and the freedom of exo-movement give players more control over encounters than Battlefield 6’s unpredictable large-scale chaos. Advanced Warfare also excels in weapon design and customization. The futuristic arsenal feels fresh, distinctive, and satisfying, with energy weapons and advanced tech adding variety without becoming gimmicky. The Pick 13 system allows for deeper loadout creativity than traditional Call of Duty titles, enabling players to build setups perfectly suited to their playstyle. In contrast, Battlefield 6’s weapon balance has often been inconsistent, and its large-scale structure means individual loadout choices sometimes matter less than map positioning or vehicle dominance. The game’s campaign is another area where Advanced Warfare outshines Battlefield 6. With a strong narrative, high production values, impressive motion capture, and memorable performances most notably from Kevin Spacey the story is cinematic and engaging from start to finish. Battlefield 6 lacks a traditional campaign entirely, leaving players who enjoy single-player experiences without an equivalent. Additionally, Advanced Warfare’s cooperative modes offer more replayability and variety than Battlefield 6’s strictly multiplayer-focused approach. Overall, Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare provides a thrilling, fast-paced, and innovative shooter experience that holds up remarkably well today. For players who enjoy futuristic technology, skill-based movement, creative weapon variety, and immediate action, Advanced Warfare feels far more engaging than Battlefield 6’s slower, vehicle-heavy formula. It represents a bold evolution of the Call of Duty formula one that rewards individual skill and offers a level of intensity and verticality that Battlefield simply doesn’t attempt to match.

The singleplayer was a fun, exciting, and extremely cinematic story that combined with the sci-fi gameplay to create memorable game. However, this is a relatively short experience clocking in at around 8 hours with very little replay value as the story is on rails and there are not various play styles to build into. The multiplayer today would be unsafe to play as Activision completely abandons CoDs once their year is up, and this assumes you can find any lobbies. Yet, Activision still expects an unhinged $60 for this product which is absurd. This is a terrible value and even if the problematic multiplayer still works, there are a variety of anti-consumer practices within it that make this game unworthy of your time and money.

Overhated COD on my Opinion, Story was a rocksolid 9/10. The Main and Side characters were okay written , the setting in near future really had me going as im a Sci-Fi dude. But damn the Villain... Jonathan Irons was so good. Cutscenes also were really good and i personally had no bugs. Only downside no real Ultrawide Support so yea had to play on my Second Monitor

While it was very nice to replay this game from my teen years, i cannot even begin to think to recommend this to anyone on PC. The port itself is unstable, and its really ment for controller rather than keyboard with a lot of the abilities and such. The port had several lag issues, framedrops, and not to mention the 80+ times it crashed on me with my pc. Before you say a thing, my pc can run cyberpunk and doom darkages fine. I pushed through to 100% the game, and afterwards i was left really deflated and annoyed to hell. So, while its GREAT on xbox or playstation, dont get it on pc.