Assassin's Creed® III Remastered

Не Ремастеред а гавно

Полное дерьмо.

THOSE DAMN SHIPS

垃圾中的垃圾，如果刺客信条系列只选一个不玩的，选刺客信条3就行了。操作手感、游戏引导，都烂到无以复加，烂中之烂。特别如果刚玩完艾吉奥三部曲，玩这个会落差特别大，垃圾中的垃圾

Muy mal optimizado el juego, es increíble que tarde en cargar demasiado incluso en el menú principal. Intenté haciendo unos cambios en la PC y ni aún así funciona. Si lo arreglaran, lo volvería a comprar.

Analisando esta versão remasterizada, digo que ela não vale a pena. Custando 3 vezes mais do que a versão original, entrega pouquíssimas mudanças relevantes. Alguns NPCs ficaram medonhos com as novas texturas de peles e iluminações. Como é não mais possível comprar a versão original, tenho que me contentar com esta (mas se houvesse opção, nunca teria comprado este remaster).

I have a hard time making my mind up about this game. I'm settling on this being a 7/10 Assassin's Creed game, and this is coming as a fan of the franchise. There's much I like and despise about this game, so much so that both sides balance it out to become: meh. I like the upgraded visuals and graphics, the previous games were getting a little long in the tooth. But the things they display is so bland, there was something memorable about each city and area in the previous games, the three cities of AC1 and the Kingdom portion had their own vibe, the cities in AC2, Brotherhood and Revelations are so iconic, here in AC3, none of that is true, Boston and New York feel the same, nothing distinctive, and the Frontier is an unpleasant area to be in thanks to everything wanting to kill you all the time. There are no tombs to explore which gave previous cities something distinctive, and the Underground that Boston and New York have are a poor substitute. The gameplay is changed, for the better in some places, for the worse in others. I don't have too much of an opinion on this, the control systems of AC games has always been clunky, and this is no different. The story to me is fascinating and boring at the same time, the "grey area" they wanted to push with the "Templars being the good guys" just didn't work for me, all of them came across as hypocritical. They talk a whole lot without their actions backing them up. I despise Haytham Kenway. But I like the perspective that Connor brings, as a Native American in this conflict, and having completed the homestead missions, I like Connor as a protagonist too. The naval combat was an inferior version to Black Flag's for me, unfortunately. Some side missions were fun, the Cpt. Kidd missons, for eg. and the Homestead missions. The rest were whatever. The optional objectives were insanely stupid in a couple of instances (looking at you, The Giant and the Storm), knocking down my enjoyment in getting 100% completion and achievements a whole lot (even though I did manage it, in the end), in previous games, they were never RNG based and usually tested your skill, not so in this game. In the end, for the base game, all I can say is that it wasn't as memorable as other entries for me, but it was overall an enjoyable experience, and I respect it for the stepping stone it provided for other greater entries (like BF with the naval combat, etc). As for the DLC, TOKW rules, I loved the special powers. No notes, it was great, a very enjoyable experience. As for Liberation Remastered, it's a 5/10 for me. Some aspects were cool, playing as Aveline, a female protagonist was cool, the persona system was nice. But it shows that it was a handheld console game, and suffers due to it in all aspects. The voice acting, story. UI, side objectives, heck, the entire game, is sort of a downgrade from other entries. But for what it is, I enjoyed my time with it in general.