
Alone in the Dark: Classic Collection brings the seminal survival horror masterpieces of the 90's to your PC today.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Discounts
Every price cut of more than 20% we have observed, in each market that quoted one, with this game's chart position on either side of it. These are episodes, not a model: a sale is one event, and one event cannot tell you what the next one will do.
Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 0/day in the week to Aug 8 → 0.14/day in the week after.
For scale, across Steam · Top Sellers · Brazil over the last 30 days: the 25 chart moves that followed a price cut of more than 20% went a median of 10 places towards #1, and the 2,413 moves with no price cut behind them went 2 away. One store, one chart, one country — it is the only place we have enough observations to say even that.
Prices outside the United States have been collected since 6 August 2026 and chart positions since 19 July 2026, so a cut older than that has no market to compare and a market that joined later has no history yet. Nothing here is converted between currencies.
About
Genres
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 46 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
[h2]Review: Alone in the Dark (1992)[/h2] I grew up in the MS-DOS era. I remember arrow keys, menu-driven actions, fixed camera angles, and games that expected the player to read manuals and accept trial-and-error as part of the experience. This review is not written from a “modern gamer shocked by old controls” perspective, but from someone who understands the context this game was made in. That said, [i]Alone in the Dark[/i] is very much a product of its time — both in good ways and in ways that make it difficult to recommend today. [hr][/hr] [b]Historical significance[/b] From a historical standpoint, its importance is undeniable. This was one of the earliest true survival horror games, combining polygonal characters with pre-rendered backgrounds, fixed camera angles, limited resources, and an oppressive atmosphere inspired by H. P. Lovecraft. Many of the genre conventions later refined by games like Resident Evil clearly trace back to this title. Seeing those ideas in their raw, original form is interesting, and in that sense the game works well as a piece of gaming history. [hr][/hr] [b]Atmosphere and presentation[/b] Atmosphere is one of the game’s stronger elements. The mansion setting, music, and sound design do a lot of work, and the presentation still has a certain charm. The visuals are crude by modern standards, but they are consistent and distinctive, and it’s easy to understand why this felt impressive in 1992. [hr][/hr] [b]Controls and gameplay[/b] Where the game struggles today is interaction and control. Movement, combat, and basic actions rely heavily on menus and context switching, often requiring multiple inputs just to perform simple tasks. This was normal at the time, but it feels extremely rigid now. Combat is awkward and unreliable, and the fixed camera angles frequently work against the player rather than creating deliberate tension. The game also leans heavily on surprise deaths, hidden triggers, and knowledge-based progression. Instant-death traps, enemies appearing from off-screen, and puzzles that offer little feedback are common. Saving frequently isn’t optional — it’s required. [hr][/hr] [b]Who this is for[/b] This does not make the game “bad,” but it does mean it demands a very specific mindset. You are not meant to play it fluidly or intuitively. You are meant to proceed slowly, cautiously, and with patience — and to accept failure as part of learning the game’s logic. For players interested in the origins of survival horror, [i]Alone in the Dark[/i] is worth experiencing. For players looking for a comfortable or enjoyable game to play today, even those familiar with DOS-era systems, it is much harder to recommend. Respecting its legacy does not require forcing yourself to enjoy it. [hr][/hr] [b]Conclusion[/b] A historically important and atmospheric game that laid the groundwork for an entire genre, but one whose design limitations and control scheme make it difficult to play by modern standards — even for those who remember the era it came from.
Media
Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English**languages with full audio support
Hours played at review time, across 46 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
First game is an absolute gem and the father of survival horror. I played it with my girlfriend and we both had lot of fun in exploring and solving the puzzles. It was nice to read the in-game "books" that gives tips on the puzzles and settles a cool lovecraftian lore. I will play AitD2 and 3 next.
First playthrough review time. Alone in the Dark is one of the earliest survival horror games. It uses supernatural horror ideas and focuses more on mood than action. The graphics look very old now, but at the time the mix of 3D characters and pre-rendered backgrounds felt new. The game is mostly about moving through a large mansion, finding clues, and solving puzzles while staying away from danger. Supplies are limited, especially ammo, so using them without thinking can cause problems later. Fighting is not always needed, and many situations can be avoided. Sound and setting do most of the work during play. Overall, the game is about exploring a mansion, solving puzzles, and dealing with danger using limited resources. Some parts have not aged well, like the controls and camera angles, but it still shows the early style of survival horror games. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3189299588
It hasn’t aged gracefully. The 3D models are goofy, not to mention their stances and movements when fighting; the controls aren’t complicated but feel clunky, and they make running especially difficult; you can die so easily that save scumming is recommended; and some puzzles are really obscure (what logic dictates that placing mirrors on statuettes kills monsters standing nearby?). It was already dated by the time the first [b]Resident Evil[/b] came out, and aside from more recent games deliberately recalling the same feel (like [b]White Night[/b]), this style of gameplay with fixed, cinematic camera angles has been out of fashion since, what, 2001? It’s still a classic, not just as a pioneer. It delivers a great atmosphere and an oppressive feeling that not even the immediate sequels have been able to replicate, on top of the Lovecraftian elements thanks to the Chaosium license of the time, making it a fine “companion piece” to [b]Shadow of the Comet[/b] (there’s even a book referencing events that are explored in more detail in that game); a budget release bundling the CD versions of both even existed. It’s quite short, with the Derceto mansion being large but fairly realistic, yet densely packed; once you get used to its timing, the combat isn’t even that difficult, and there are many ways to conserve the scarce ammo. To this day, I still love how it took me a while to realize I could block the first two monsters from entering the attic (it helps that, differently from nowadays, 3D interactable objects clearly stand out in the scenery). Its position in videogame history is also “secured” by how the two sequels lost most of the atmosphere and, following them, further games bearing the AitD brand got worse and worse (I honestly didn’t like even [b]The New Nightmare[/b] that much) until 2024, though I still have to try the most recent entry. Not the best reason to sit at the top, but still.
Классику знать надо!
Alone in the Dark 1, originally developed by Infogrames in 1992 and now made available on Steam through THQ Nordic, stands as one of the foundational pillars of survival horror. Long before the genre became codified through later franchises, this title established many of the conventions that would define horror gaming for decades. More than just a historical curiosity, it remains a fascinating and surprisingly effective experience, offering a blend of atmosphere, exploration, puzzle-solving, and tension that continues to resonate despite the passage of time. Set in the 1920s in the foreboding Louisiana mansion known as Derceto, the game begins with the mysterious suicide of Jeremy Hartwood. Players can choose to control either Edward Carnby, a private investigator, or Emily Hartwood, the deceased’s niece. While the choice of protagonist has minor narrative differences, both characters share the same overarching goal: to uncover the truth behind the strange events in the mansion and ultimately escape alive. The narrative draws heavily from gothic horror and Lovecraftian themes, weaving occult elements, forbidden knowledge, and cosmic dread into a tightly contained environment. Much of the storytelling unfolds through letters, books, and environmental clues, encouraging players to piece together the mystery through exploration rather than overt exposition. What truly distinguished Alone in the Dark at release was its technical and artistic design. The game combined polygonal character models with pre-rendered, fixed-camera backgrounds, creating a cinematic presentation that was revolutionary for its time. The fixed camera angles do more than simply frame the action—they carefully control what the player sees and, crucially, what remains hidden. This deliberate restriction of visibility heightens suspense, as enemies can approach from off-screen or appear suddenly when transitioning between rooms. The mansion itself feels oppressive and labyrinthine, with each creaking floorboard and shadowy corridor contributing to an ever-present sense of unease. Gameplay balances combat and puzzles in a way that emphasizes vulnerability. Resources are limited, weapons are scarce, and many enemies are best avoided rather than confronted directly. The player must carefully manage inventory space, search rooms methodically for keys or useful items, and interpret cryptic documents that hint at solutions. Some puzzles are straightforward mechanical challenges, while others require attention to narrative context or careful experimentation. The game does not provide extensive guidance, which can make progression demanding, but this lack of handholding reinforces immersion and tension. The possibility of sudden death—triggered by a misstep, a hidden trap, or an unexpected monster—creates a constant undercurrent of risk. The combat system, while rudimentary by modern standards, contributes significantly to the atmosphere. Characters move with deliberate, tank-like controls, and attacks must be timed carefully. Encounters often feel awkward and tense rather than empowering, which aligns perfectly with the horror tone. The player is not a superhero but a vulnerable human navigating a hostile environment. Even simple confrontations can become stressful, as poor positioning or misjudged timing can quickly lead to defeat. This fragility fosters caution and encourages thoughtful exploration over reckless action. Visually, Alone in the Dark 1 clearly reflects early 1990s technology, with blocky character models and limited animation. However, the pre-rendered backgrounds are richly detailed and artistically composed. The mansion’s design conveys age, decay, and hidden menace, and the use of lighting and shadow enhances the eerie ambiance. Sound design further amplifies the tension, with sparse but effective audio cues punctuating moments of danger. The relative minimalism of the presentation leaves room for the player’s imagination, often making the experience more unsettling than more graphically explicit modern horror games. From a historical perspective, the game’s influence cannot be overstated. It introduced many elements that later became genre staples: fixed camera angles, limited inventory management, resource scarcity, environmental storytelling, and a focus on atmosphere over action. Later survival horror giants would refine and popularize these mechanics, but Alone in the Dark laid the groundwork. Its DNA can be traced through decades of horror titles, making it a crucial touchstone for understanding the evolution of the genre. Playing Alone in the Dark 1 today requires patience and an appreciation for classic design philosophy. The controls may feel stiff, and the pacing can be slow compared to contemporary standards. Yet for those willing to adapt, the game offers a rewarding and immersive experience. Its deliberate tempo, intricate mansion layout, and reliance on player observation create a sense of genuine discovery. Each unlocked door and deciphered clue feels earned rather than handed out. Ultimately, Alone in the Dark 1 remains more than just a relic of gaming history. It is a testament to how atmosphere, careful design, and narrative intrigue can transcend technological limitations. While modern survival horror has evolved dramatically, the core principles established here still underpin the genre. As both a pioneering work and an enduringly tense adventure, Alone in the Dark 1 continues to justify its reputation as one of the most important horror games ever created. Rating: 8/10
Like a weird mish mash of what would be Survival Horror and a point and click adventure game. I think this is necessary to play if only to see the birth of Survival Horror and how Resident Evil completely streamlined every idea in this game for the better. (Except for dying in multiple cheap and silly ways, but you can't really do that without a quicksave)
Уго я нашел батю резидента Зумеры бегите отсюда ,даже я тут прикурил по геймлею Устарела все и вся Чисто для ознакомления и коллекции 6/10
Давно я хотел попробовать классику жанра, отца и дедушку Survival horror: Alone in the Dark. Манило меня любопытство прочувствовать игру 1992 года. Каково это было тогда, и в чём заключается "культ"? Сам по себе жанр мне интересен но в большинстве своём – "отвратителен". Помню "топорность" второго Резика на первой плойке. Помню жуткий Silent Hill. Эти игры привлекают к себе взгляд, ведь они кардинально отличаются от привычных мне Quake II, BLOOD, Duke 3D. С другой стороны второй Принц Персии, где ты выпрыгиваешь в окно и мчишь налево к кораблю, в корму которого ещё хрен запрыгнешь просто так, по ощущениям от воспоминаний. Alone in the Dark точно нет места в осколках моей памяти; игру я никогда не видел и не знал. Возможно она есть среди тех двух-сотен игр но, наверное, к счастью этот "ужас" миновал меня тогда. С выходом современной, одноимённой игры я всё чаще стал кидать классику в корзину, но внутри что-то перевешивало и я забивал на покупку. При этом как-то захотел посмотреть прохождение и офигел от геймплея! Со стороны всё выглядело логично и интригующе. Да и прохождение заняло у человека какой-то час-полтора. И вот оно: с желанием поиграть да пройти новую часть, появился повод ознакомиться с великой классикой жанра. [b]Ох уж эта золотая эпоха ретро-гейминга..[/b] Великий и могучий DOSBox. Так просто жмаканием пары кнопок игру фиг настроишь. Прям как тогда, когда в Дюке 3Д из-под DOS настройка музыки проходит на ура, а остальные звуки попросту не алё. Времена идут а среда DOS словно не меняется, хотя казалось бы... Да, в Стим версии, "позаимствованной" с ГОГа, по классике всё настроено: кнопку тыкнул и играй. Только игра на английском. Находишь в сообществе русификацию; ставишь и.. игра после вступительного ролика виснет. Поковыряв какое-то количество времени гайды и конфигурационные файлы, наконец-то, оживив оверлей Стима, взяв в руки "Боксовый" джойстик можно и попробовать игрой насладиться! Вот только как бы я ни шаманил с разрешением и масштабированием – почему-то и от чего-то более свежая версия DOSBox напрочь отказывалась хоть что-то в этом вопросе менять. Плюнул я в общем, и пошёл изучать особняк Дерсето. [b]"Отпусти меня – чердак!"[/b] "Один в темноте" встречает непривычной фиксированной камерой, и поначалу представляет себя в роли избиения меня... Я помню то чудное мгновение, когда прикоснулся в ремастере к Ларе Крофт. В первое прохождение тогда решил отдать дань и пройти игру с танковым управлением и круглыми квадратами :| Привыкнуть конечно стоило, но наградой послужила крутая формула геймплея. Вот только разница между этими двумя играми – четыре года. Это очень много и большой скачок для тех лет (однако AitD уже в 92-ом показывала миру полноценные 3D модели, и некоторые объекты). В "AitD" есть изюминка в виде двойного нажатия на клавишу "вперёд" для осуществления бега персонажа и это – боль. При этом никаких резких движений. У игры задан чёткий темп; и в бою, один на один, если ты пропустил удар то это загрузка.. если был сделан сейв. Может всех фишек я не узнал, но про "уклонение" (шаг назад) я понял далеко не сразу. А система боя тут занятная. Зажал кнопку действия, и жми стрелки: влево, вправо – удар рукой, левой или правой. Вперёд, назад – ногой соответственно. И для большего погружения у игры нет привычного игроку интерфейса. Здоровье персонажа; предметы и выбор действия (будь то использовать или потянуть объект) все они выведены в меню инвентаря. Что по-первой напрочь взрывает мозг но, потом привыкаешь. И вот я, прочувствовав игру начинаю исследовать комнаты, подбирать всякие предметы. Куда-то пытаюсь их применять. Где-то интуитивно сработало, а где-то "что-куда тебя девать?!". И вот мой инвентарь заполнен. Дробовик – штука полезная. Аптечка тоже. Книги так же может куда-то нужны, кроме прочтения. И вот этот осколок вазы.. тоже? Да? Или нет? И вот он я: "один в темноте". Сейчас-то да, чего там: открыл гайд и поехали. Поиграй я тогда, в своё время в эту игру, возникло бы у меня желание вернуться и узнать – что же было дальше? Ведь играть в AitD – это боль. Но так же это дико интересный дизайн и любопытные механики всего, что предлагает эта игра в далёком 1992 году. [i]...и как я чёрт побери через современный монитор разобрал ту кучку пикселей, уронив всего пару раз персонажа в воду, проходя секцию ближе к концу игры?![/i] Alone in the Dark – это та "слепая" проба пера в совершенно непонятном и неизвестном жанре. Это тот музей искусства, про который быть может забыли. А потом вытащили в очередной раз из чулана, спустя девять, или семь.. или тридцать лет и: –"что ты такое?" – в лучшем случае. А потом и вовсе, заколотили парадный вход и все выходы из особняка Дерсето, словно и не было здесь ничего и никогда. Словно все труды это всего-лишь "сон собаки". Но видео-игры, они как картины, ну почти. Главное, чтобы эмуляция среды DOS не схлопнулась через века. Вот бы – ремастер...
How games have changed XD
Selling now
See how fast this game is selling right now — estimated copies and revenue per day from recent review growth.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | 0 | — | — | |
| $1.1M | 4.2K | 90% | $9.99 | |
| $951.8K | 1.9K | 94% | $14.99 | |
| $446.6K | 4.4K | 96% | $4.99 | |
| $422.4K | 1.8K | 91% | $9.99 | |
| $185.3K | 571 | 94% | $9.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $162.1K | 322 | 82% | $24.99 | |
| $162K | 1.4K | 77% | $5.99 | |
| $162.1K | 598 | 94% | $11.99 | |
| $162.1K | 683 | 63% | $9.99 | |
| $161.9K | 723 | 86% | $14.99 | |
| $161.9K | 633 | 88% | $8.99 |