
Play a doctor in Vital Signs: Emergency Department and challenge your medical knowledge to help treat a wide array of cases who come into the ER.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media

About
Play an ER doctor in Vital Signs: Emergency Department and challenge your medical knowledge to help treat a wide array of cases who come into the ER. Unlike medical school anyone can enroll in Vital Signs!
Reach a diagnosis by selecting from a wide range of tests and prescribe treatments to give your patients the best possible care. However, your decisions and how you handle the influx of cases who arrive during your shift will decide who gets the care they need and who misses out!
You completed the scenarios offered in the main game and have seen all nine patients. Naturally, you reached the best ideal care vs. improper care scores that are possible in Vital Signs: Emergency Department – so what now?
A day in the life of an ER doctor is almost never complete, and if you think you are capable of doing more, check out our nine additional content packs available for download on Steam. These content packs give you access to more scenarios and more patients so you can get back into the ER and save lives. What are you waiting for, doctor?
Two scenarios
9 patient cases
Add more patient cases and scenarios with downloadable content
Adjustable game speed to match your comfort level
Scoring based on ideal care vs. improper care
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English**languages with full audio support
Engagement
Hours played at review time, across 40 reviews with recorded playtime.
Reviews
Themes across 40 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
Vital Signs: Emergency Department, developed and published by BreakAway Games, is a serious medical simulation that places players directly in the role of an emergency room physician. Rather than presenting a dramatized hospital narrative or fast-paced arcade-style gameplay, the title aims to replicate the complexity and pressure of real-world emergency medicine. It focuses on clinical reasoning, prioritization, and time management, offering a niche but immersive experience for players interested in realistic professional simulations. The core gameplay revolves around diagnosing and treating patients who arrive in the emergency department with a range of symptoms and conditions. Each case begins with an intake of vital signs, medical history, and presenting complaints. From there, players must decide which diagnostic tests to order—such as blood work, imaging scans, or specialist consultations—while interpreting results carefully to determine the appropriate course of treatment. The game challenges players to think methodically, balancing caution with efficiency. Misdiagnoses or delayed treatment can negatively impact patient outcomes, reinforcing the importance of thoughtful decision-making. One of the defining aspects of Vital Signs is its emphasis on multitasking. The emergency department environment is portrayed as constantly active, with multiple patients requiring attention simultaneously. Players must triage effectively, deciding which cases require immediate intervention and which can safely wait. Interruptions such as paperwork, phone calls, and overlapping test results contribute to the sense of urgency. The experience captures the administrative and logistical pressures of emergency medicine alongside clinical responsibilities, creating a layered simulation that extends beyond simple diagnosis. The interface is designed around patient charts, test menus, and medical data rather than physical navigation or character movement. Most interactions occur through selecting options within a detailed UI, reflecting the procedural nature of hospital workflows. While functional, the interface can initially feel dense and overwhelming, particularly for players without prior medical knowledge. Medical terminology is presented with limited contextual explanation, which contributes to a steep learning curve. As a result, early sessions may involve trial and error while players familiarize themselves with available tests, medications, and treatment protocols. The game includes a base set of scenarios and cases, each representing different medical situations that require distinct approaches. Additional downloadable content expands the available case library, introducing specialized scenarios focused on injuries, toxicology, or age-specific complications. These expansions increase replay value by offering varied clinical challenges, though they build upon the same fundamental mechanics rather than introducing entirely new systems. The focus remains consistently centered on diagnostic accuracy and workflow management. Visually, Vital Signs prioritizes clarity over aesthetic flourish. The presentation is clean and clinical, mirroring the structured environment of a hospital setting. Charts, lab results, and imaging reports are displayed in a straightforward manner. There are no elaborate animations or cinematic sequences; instead, the game’s immersion comes from the authenticity of its procedural detail. Sound design is similarly understated, with minimal audio cues supporting the predominantly menu-driven experience. In terms of difficulty, the simulation demands patience and analytical thinking. Unlike more accessible management games, Vital Signs does not guide players extensively through its mechanics. Success depends on carefully reviewing symptoms, considering differential diagnoses, and selecting appropriate interventions. The absence of a traditional tutorial may discourage some players, but those willing to invest time in learning the systems may find satisfaction in mastering increasingly complex cases. Ultimately, Vital Signs: Emergency Department stands out as a niche simulation that prioritizes realism and professional accuracy over broad accessibility. It does not attempt to gamify medicine into a casual experience; instead, it presents emergency care as a demanding, decision-heavy discipline. While its interface complexity and steep learning curve may limit its appeal to a general audience, it offers a unique and thoughtful simulation for players interested in the intricacies of medical practice. For those drawn to serious simulations that mirror real-world professions, it provides a challenging and focused portrayal of life inside a busy emergency department. Rating: 6/10
игра превосходная, но не хватает русского языка
most thing dlc locked, infectious disease also dlc locked, the cases are nice but only few. only get it if u in medical field tho
it's good for who wants to be a medical doctor
This really needs to be improved upon. Main example: there's at least two instances of hypothermic patients and no way to warm them up. No warm saline, no warm liquid down NGT, no blankets, no nothing. There are medical abreviations without an index (which is scientifically mandatory, when you are reaching a broader audience than that of your OG country, fyi). Time goes by stupidily fast. There are incongruences - like for example: need for intubation in patient and etomidate, propofol and other drugs are "incorrect" in use...??? Makes the game unplayable. Also, often ICU consult will say that an intubated, in hypovolemic shock patient doesn't have critical needs?? are you joking??? From the standpoint of someone that works in ER, it's not realistic. The cases are solidily built, which means it has lots of potential, but the game needs larger algorithms for acceptable answers and also an explanation board.
I love medical games and always have. But, as reluctantly as I must, I have to give it a thumbs-down. Unless you are a trained medical professional and for some reason want to play a game about your full-time job, you might be okay. But for the rest of the population (like me), it's a bit too complex. I'll post a quick TLDR and pros/cons under this review, but here are some of the issues: First the tutorial. While it takes you through a very brief overview of the controls, I felt that I could really use more hand-holding on at least the first case, especially because it's timed. Also, the game assumes you know the names of all the different drugs and what they do, as well as a general idea of dosage. You're basically searching through lists of procedures and terms to pick the right ones- no explanations, no little button to click on for more info, no nothing. WebMD and Google will be your friends as your patient's vitals rapidly deteriorate- let me mention again that this is timed, and taking too long will also give your next patient more time to go downhill. And in the treatment menus you have *lots* of choices, like scroll through multiple menus lots, and they don't narrow them down one bit based on your case. I got (more like fumbled) through the first case and a half and then stress-quit, and these cases were meant to be easy. While that's realistic as an accurate sim, it's pretty overwhelming for someone who just wants to play a game and have fun. Look to Bio Inc or the 1995 Emergency Room game for better play experiences. TLDR: Pretty hard for laypeople- way too many treatments to learn and no help. Try it first (it's free) but don't buy the DLC outright unless you like it. Pros: Controls are easy to learn, graphics and layout decent-ish, free original game Cons: Requires a lot of medical knowledge, no in-game help with terminology or treatments, aggressive invisible timer, can be stressful. overwhelming treatment options
Good and very challenging
This isn't a game.
I am not a med student but I always had a fascination with biology and anatomy, I have to say that I am pretty baffled by all the technical terms and medical requirements. This is not to say it's a bad game or anything, but It's just simply too complex. I understand that the target audience is most likely Doctors in an intern level looking to be trained in the real world. But you end up missing out a good target audience who are keen and curious. The game is not bad, but the complexity makes it difficult especially when your trying to rush through everything because the pressure becomes overwhelming. Disappointingly It's a missed opportunity.
I should mention that I really love testing and playing simulation games, especially medicine games. This one accurately portrays the busy ER; unfortunately there's a high learning curve with the game and no feedback on the case, why what was done was wrong, or anything of the sort.) For those inexperienced or not very fluent in medicine; the game is virtually impossible. Time crunch, plus no debrief of the case makes this game frustrating and tiring. For those experienced; it's interesting but...again- no feedback doesn't allow for self improvement. I'd love to re-try once feedback is added on each case; but I'm aware that this is an older game. Full Code is an amazing example of what this game could be.
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time, reconstructed from Steam's monthly review histogram.
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| 2 3 4 Player Mini Games | $683.7M | 1.4M | 87% | Free |
| Sid Meier’s Civilization® VI | $580.3M | 376.5K | 86% | $59.99 |
| Pizza Ready! | $572.5M | 2.7M | 88% | Free |
| DayZ | $531.7M | 465.7K | 78% | $49.99 |
| Phone Case DIY | $492.3M | 913.2K | 87% | Free |
| Hearts of Iron IV | $478.1M | 372.5K | 90% | $49.99 |
Related
| 未来战士 | $9.3K | 111 | 100% | $4.99 |
| ETERNAL BLOOD | $9.3K | 111 | 73% | $4.99 |
| Flan's MS | $9.3K | 161 | 89% | $3.99 |
| Cute Suika: Big Watermelon | $9.3K | 64 | 86% | $4.99 |
| Unhack | $9.3K | 137 | 95% | $3.99 |
| The Fairy's Secret | $9.3K | 50 | 92% | $11.99 |