Tick Tock: A Tale for Two

We put this game to every storefront we collect. A market that answered not sold has told us something about the game; a market we never asked has not, and the two are never drawn the same.

• 🇺🇸UShome$2.99
• 🇦🇺AUA$4.99
• 🇧🇷BRR$19.90
• 🇨🇦CACA$3.99
• 🇩🇪DE€2.99
• 🇫🇷FR€2.99
• 🇬🇧UK£2.99
• 🇯🇵JP¥500
• 🇰🇷KR₩4,400
• 🇲🇽MXMX$69.00
• 🇵🇱PLPLN 14.99
• 🇷🇺RURUB 249.00
• 🇹🇷TRTRY 149.99
• 🇺🇦UA$3.99
• 🇨🇳CNNot sold

14 on sale1 answered “not sold”0 we did not ask

The 1 “not sold” market is read from the App Store price pass of Aug 23: that day the store answered for this game elsewhere and gave no price there. The 14 priced markets are the same rows as the table above — each the latest price we hold, dated here when it is older than that pass. The 0 marked “not asked” were not put to this store at all — either it has no storefront there or we do not collect it yet, and neither is a statement about the game. A refusal is a refusal on one day; a store can list a title again tomorrow.

Each storefront's own chart, in its own country — the closest public signal to sales where none is published. A country missing from a list is one we don't collect there, not one where the game doesn't chart.

Each storefront's own ratings counter and average — separate, overlapping audiences, never added together.

14 of 15 markets; the rest gave no counter or aren't reached yet, not markets where nobody rated it.

How fast this game is gaining ratings — the activity signal available where a store publishes no sales or install numbers.

Measured from our own daily snapshots, not reported by the store. Deliberately not converted into sales: a one-tap rating's ratio to copies sold is unknown on this platform, and guessing it would be worse than leaving it out.

Matched by title — a reused name can pair the wrong games. * is a critic aggregate. Prices and positions are each store's United States storefront; Epic charts worldwide. Audience and Score too, except Steam's, which is worldwide.