
Tempest Citadel is a base building simulation set on a storm-ruled planet with a vivid sci-fi story. Build a mighty Citadel in the clouds for your crew of explorers and conquer the deadly planet below in automated squad battles!
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media
About






Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English
Engagement
Hours played at review time, across 40 reviews with recorded playtime.
Reviews
Themes across 40 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
NOTE: MY OPINION OF THIS GAME IS NEUTRAL/AVERAGE/MIDDLE THUMB, BUT SINCE STEAM DOESN'T HAVE THAT OPTION, I'M GIVING IT A THUMBS UP. Tempest Citadel is a strategy game with an interesting premise and setting, placing you in command of a floating citadel on a mysterious storm-covered planet. Over the course of the campaign, you manage soldiers, research new weapons and upgrades, and fight with several factions on the planet. While the progression systems, classes, and research tree initially suggest a deep tactical experience, most of the game’s mechanics are heavily automated, with battles resolving in under a minute and much of the equipment and research handled automatically. Because of this automation, much of the potential strategic depth ends up feeling superficial. Outcomes often depend more on RNG than on meaningful player decisions, making save-scumming a more effective strategy than careful planning. The biggest issue is the FATE mechanic, which quietly penalizes losses and even close victories, potentially locking players out of the best ending without clearly explaining how it works. In the end, Tempest Citadel isn’t a terrible game and can be a chill experience if you’re willing to overlook its flaws, but some poorly designed systems make it difficult to strongly recommend. Full video review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEU7U2afmHc
Je ne suis pas fan. Ce jeu me fait l'effet d'un X-Com aux combats joués en auto-battle, la gestion base/recherche/équipement ne suffit pas. L'effort de rédaction d'une histoire et de descriptifs est louable mais pas suffisamment accrocheur à mon goût pour que j'insiste au-delà de la première zone, je ne me sens pas de me peler une interminable suite de bastons auto avant l'hypothétique fin mot de l''histoire.
Different and gripping story :) well, worth your time :)
great game
Összességében nem lett ez rossz game, csak idejét múlta mára azt gondolom, a mechanika hozott pár újdonságot a 2018-as évben az elődökhöz képest :) Köszönöm szépen a fejlesztőktől a steam kulcsot :)
An interesting idea implemented in a janky and haphazard way, with the feel and content quality of a mobile game, or of early 2000s Slav-jank. Short version: This is a mobile-style game that bears the same relationship to base-building and tactical strategy games that arcade rail-shooters bear to actual tactical shooter FPS games. The art style is technically good, but weirdly inappropriate. There is a ton of sloppy lack of attention to detail, in both text (and the game does give you reading assignments) and mechanics (from mere opaque or irrelevant mechanics, to actively player-hostile and depressing/unenjoyable mechanics). The combat is interesting but very, very alpha-ish and janky. The UI has some absurdly bad design choices (again, feels like mobile port with PC UI as an afterthought). Overall, it's amateurish and feels like editing oversight and QA did not happen. ---- UI is not the worst I've seen, but it's pretty bad. The rule is basic: if you don't have incredible insight into UI conventions such that you are blazing a trail, follow convention. Don't be weird, special, or creative. UI is quality of life, not your artistic opportunity. Do NOT mess with system keys unless you've made it airtight: specifically, don't make the ALT and TAB and SPACE keys unpause the game (even when alt-tabbed out of the game!). I alt-tab, go to a different desktop, type some things, and find that the game never stopped responding to my keypresses (!). *The game unpauses when you alt-tab out.* The writing is average for the field (i.e., slightly melodromatic mobile-type game), but has embarrassing gaffes. No one should ever write "bezerk" (which, as we know, is properly pronounced bee-ZURK), and do not misspell crewmate "cremate" twice in the same paragraph. Then again, embarrassing gaffes are kind of normal for the field. Make your mechanics transparent, not opaque. Do stats rise? Can they ever? I still don't know 10 hours into the game. Why do I have a choice between two character perks, one that offers 1% morale boost for those around him, and another that offers 10%? Same cost; get rid of the 1% one. Better yet: why do I even care? I can't tell where this even matters. Why can a character with DEX 49 never raise his DEX again (as far as I can tell a couple of years into the game), but one with DEX 50 can skyrocket it to 90 with one perk? How can I tell where engineers or scientists are assigned in jobs? I just see vague references to outposts providing job slots, but no actual representation of this. It's just a sort of background "you now have +2 wingwang!" as far as I can tell. It's supposed to have a little XCOM in it, but the progression is entirely sequential and chosen, like... a mobile game. When do I step on the next dot? I'll decide. The character art style is good for mobile romantic game, but it rubs in this genre. Make the pictures smaller, give less weirdness, and for god's sake make character appearance customizable so that we can get rid of incredibly stupid-looking rolls. Half of them look like drug-addled street homeless. (If that is the intent, bad, bad art design decision.) Positive point, I kind of like the combat model. It's a cool RTT alternative that flows well. BUT -- it's unforgivable that shots are instant-hitscan damage, while the visual of the shot takes another 1 to 1.5 seconds to be shown intersecting with the target. Completely eliminates any sense of cause and effect between them. The thing that killed it for me, as I was going to try to actually finish it out of curiosity, was the fact that the normal pace of the game precludes repair of the citadel. Instead, you slowly watch the entire thing drain to disrepair and inefficiency, hoping maybe engineers will fix it, but they just don't. The dev suggests removing modules (!) which you built as part of the progress of the game so that engineers *might* be able to catch up. Yes, undo my game progress and try to de-build my base so that they *might* be able to start actually increasing the repair status of modules. And there appears to be no way to manage engineers, assign them to repair, or anything. You just, well, reverse your progress in constructing your base, and let a year go by so your modules can all rise from 46% to 54% status. Yeah, not a good game design decision. When I saw the dev's response to someone reporting this, explaining the solution above, that was the moment I uninstalled the game. There's an idea of a pretty decent game here, but it needs (needed; it was released 8 years ago, but if you ever decide to redo it) to be tightened up and brought into appropriate conventions. And if you're trying to appeal to even lite-strategy people, avoid the romance novel style art. Leave that to Baldur's Gate, where they can get away with it. And never, ever use the word "bezerk" again. Not recommended, at all, not as a PC game. Mobile games should stay on mobile. ---- Why such a long review slamming an amateur game? Actually meaning this constructively. Jokes, aside, the ridiculous misspellings and stuff are emblematic of lack of attention to detail, lack of care. It's sloppy. The UI stuff is inexcusable. Mismatching tones in art direction, overwrought writing, are glaring. Etc. If the dev redid the game up to standards, I'd definitely give it a chance.
Base Building sim with some style. Micro Manage your way to glory! https://youtu.be/L3pPquzNaFA
Video review (part 1): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT1AG0eq9dk&feature=youtu.be From what I have played of Tempest Citadel, I can honestly say this game is pretty mediocre on its own. There's not much bad to it but not much good. It's a game that has a decent story but boring and dull gameplay and art. I have to force myself through it. Seriously, just play XCom. The battles might as well be automatic. The artstyle is boring and bland and draws my attention away completely from the story. I can't honestly say I like the story especially since none of my decisions so far have seemed to make any difference. This game is not bad, but definitely not worth the 20$. There are far better ways to spend your money... like putting it towards XCom.
Combat is boring, characters get stuck in environments, and some of the sound effects sound like a guy making noises into a microphone. Pass.
Bu oyunun seslerini biri ağzıyla yapmış olabilir 20 dolar vermeden önce düşünün
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time, reconstructed from Steam's monthly review histogram.
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| Water Planet | $42.4K | 63 | 78% | $19.99 |
| 皎月坠落之时 | $42.4K | 218 | 79% | $8.99 |
| The Foretold: Westmark Legacy | $42.4K | 79 | 58% | $19.99 |
| Volgarr the Viking II | $42.4K | 98 | 83% | $19.99 |
| WHAT THE BAT? | $42.4K | 91 | 85% | $14.99 |
| Taora : Survival | $42.4K | 416 | 60% | $3.49 |