Tactical Troops: Anthracite Shift

За 25р за игру Норм, Но...! Мультиплеер к сожалению не работает. А Здесь будет кошка, люди, которые будут пролистывать страницу, могут погладить ее. 　　　 　　／＞　　フ 　　　 　　| 　_　 _ l 　 　　 　／` ミ＿xノ 　　 　 /　　　 　 | 　　　 /　 ヽ　　 ﾉ 　 　 │　　|　|　| 　／￣|　　 |　|　| 　| (￣ヽ＿_ヽ_)__) 　＼二つ

[H1] 傭兵チームを指揮する戦術級SFストラテジー [/H1] APコストを支払って移動、射撃、リロードのアクションを実施していく、ミッションクリア型のターン制ストラテジー。 グリッド方式ではない、シームレスな移動が特徴となっているが、それだけに操作は難しく、移動中に地形に引っかかりやすい。 アクションはAPの範囲で任意に組み合わせられるため、カバーから頭だけ出して敵を射撃し、また戻るといったことも可能だ。 なお、射撃は味方を含めて射線上の全てを巻き込んでいくため、障害物と射線の確保を含めた、ユニットの位置取りが難しい。 たとえるならば、ターン制のDoor Kickersといったところか。 マップの随所にテレポーターが配置されており、テレポーターを銃撃することで、離れた場所を攻撃できるアイディアが面白かった。 味方ユニットにスキルビルドや成長の要素はないが、各ミッションに隠されたアイテムボックスを収集することで、武器や使い捨てアイテムといった装備を充実させていくことができる。 ただし武器にさほどの個性はなく、初期の武器セットだけで十分。 アイテムは手りゅう弾にしても回復薬にしても各1回しか使用できず、使い勝手もあまり良くはない。 そのため多くのミッションをこなしてアイテムを揃えてもユニットが強くなっていく感覚に乏しく、やや物足りない印象を受ける。 [table] [tr] [th]言語依存度[/th] [th]★★★☆☆[/th] [/tr] [tr] [td]難易度[/td] [td]★★★☆☆[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]カスタマイズ度[/td] [td]★★☆☆☆[/td] [/tr] [/table] https://store.steampowered.com/app/248610/?snr=1_5_9__205

Wow this game is bad! I could accept very bad visuals. The lack of variety in models and gameplay just ruin it. Why do so many TBS games suck so hard.

Из-за ограничения на передвижение персонажей вне боя. Это похоже не на пошаговую стратегию. А на то что курильщик решил заняться спортом и во время одышки ему показывают надпись конец хода. Я хотел бы сыграть больше. Но лучше предпочту отказаться.

Fun, small game :) Takes some thinking, don't be fooled!

I enjoy this game. It's got a good string of single-player missions with variety, but it's also got a fun (and oft-hilarious!) multiplayer mode. Graphics are quite good for a top-down tactical turn-based game, and the developers really listen to their player base. I hope more folks find, play, and enjoy this gem!

Tactical Troops: Anthracite Shift is a methodical, systems-driven tactics game that prioritizes positioning, foresight, and calculated risk over spectacle or cinematic flair. Developed and published by QED Games, it offers a distinctive take on turn-based strategy by removing the traditional grid and replacing it with a more fluid movement system. This design choice immediately changes how the game feels, shifting the focus away from rigid tile-based planning toward a more organic interpretation of space, line of sight, and engagement angles. The core gameplay revolves around commanding a small squad of soldiers through a series of mission-based encounters on a hostile alien world. Each unit operates on an action point system, where every movement, shot, or tactical maneuver consumes a portion of a limited pool. This creates a constant tension between advancing, attacking, and preserving enough resources to react to threats. Because the game minimizes randomness, outcomes are largely determined by how well you plan your turn rather than by chance. This makes each decision feel weighty, as even a minor miscalculation—stepping into an exposed position or overextending a unit—can quickly spiral into failure. Combat unfolds at a deliberate pace, encouraging players to think several moves ahead rather than react impulsively. Positioning is everything, and the absence of a grid means that angles and distances must be judged more intuitively. The game places strong emphasis on line-of-sight mechanics, making terrain, obstacles, and elevation crucial elements of every encounter. One of the more interesting additions is the use of teleportation mechanics, which allow both your squad and enemy forces to reposition or attack from unexpected directions. This introduces a layer of unpredictability that forces players to remain adaptable, even when executing carefully constructed plans. The variety of tools at your disposal supports a range of tactical approaches. Weapons, armor, and gadgets can be combined to suit different playstyles, whether you prefer cautious, defensive positioning or more aggressive, high-risk strategies. Enemy encounters further reinforce this need for adaptability, as different enemy types require different approaches to overcome. Some prioritize brute force, while others rely on positioning or numbers, pushing you to constantly reassess your tactics rather than relying on a single dominant strategy. The campaign offers a solid number of missions with varied objectives, from eliminating threats to securing areas or surviving waves of enemies. While the mission structures can occasionally feel familiar, the changing layouts and enemy compositions help maintain a sense of challenge. There is also a multiplayer component, including both online and local options, which adds replay value for those interested in testing their strategic thinking against other players. This competitive element highlights the depth of the mechanics, as human opponents tend to exploit the system in ways that differ from AI behavior. However, the experience is not without its inconsistencies. Enemy AI can be uneven, sometimes demonstrating clever positioning and coordination, while at other times behaving in ways that feel inefficient or erratic. This can occasionally break the immersion of what is otherwise a carefully constructed tactical system. Balance is another area where the game shows its limitations, as certain equipment choices can overshadow others, reducing the incentive to experiment fully with the available arsenal. Additionally, the lack of strong character progression or individuality among squad members means that units can feel interchangeable, which diminishes the emotional impact of losses. Visually, the game adopts a functional approach that emphasizes clarity over detail. The top-down perspective and simple environments make it easy to read the battlefield, which is essential for a game built around precise positioning. However, this comes at the cost of visual personality, as the environments and character models lack distinctiveness. The audio design follows a similar path, providing adequate feedback without leaving a strong impression. Despite these shortcomings, Tactical Troops: Anthracite Shift succeeds where it matters most—its core mechanics. The gridless movement system and emphasis on line-of-sight tactics give it a unique identity within the genre, offering a fresh perspective on squad-based strategy. It rewards careful planning, punishes carelessness, and provides a satisfying sense of accomplishment when a well-executed plan comes together. In the end, it’s a game that will appeal most to players who value thoughtful, deliberate gameplay over presentation and narrative depth. It may lack the polish and personality of bigger titles, but its underlying systems are strong enough to carry the experience. For fans of tactical strategy willing to engage with its nuances, it offers a challenging and rewarding journey. Rating: 7/10

Impressed how bad it is.

Nice and tactical. Good campaign.

有联机成就和隐藏成就，估计难以完成，算了，还是搁置了。有官中，好评第一考量，推荐。 202505，steam，steam掉卡掉物抵扣，daily indie game，t a o宝，支付宝红包，杉果，fanatical，它处自定义包入的本体约3元。爱人如己，目前就这，看以后追评。兄弟萌，强烈建议不要第三方平台的小店买y u额，通过饰品等挂steam市场转的，高概率red信乃至封号，且行且珍惜。