
.T.E.S.T: Expected Behavior is a first-person brain twister with a sci-fi plot. On top of logic, you'll need a fast reaction speed, "outside the box" reasoning, and the skill to adapt to unfamiliar situations.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media

About
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English*, Russian*, French*, German*, Portuguese - Brazil*, Simplified Chinese**languages with full audio support
Engagement
Hours played at review time, across 45 reviews with recorded playtime.
Reviews
Themes across 45 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
This is an awesome puzzle game. It is easily one of the better first person puzzle games out there. This game has tons of levels and the difficulty of these levels ranges from easy to brutally hard. Some of the levels took me more than an hour to complete. A few took me around two hours to complete. You have to endure this difficulty and be patient to be able to finish this game. There are a few levels in this game which you will probably hate because they require very tedious actions or high precision. It is a good thing there is a rewind button because you will be using it a lot. Most of the levels are fun to solve. The levels are diverse and very creative. There is a story in the game but it is very thin. Only the intro and the end movie told the story. I succeeded in finishing all the levels except one very small level called ‘up’. Luckily that level was not mandatory to finish the game. I had great fun playing this game and finishing all the levels. I highly recommend this game to serious puzzle lovers.
Great stuff. And so cheap! There are TONS of levels in this thing.
Took me a while to really get into it, but once I was in, I was loving it. Some real headscratching puzzles. I'm tempted to say it's in my top 3 for first person puzzling, after Talos and the Witness.
I don't often give negative reviews for games, mostly because there is an important distinction between "I don't like this game" and "this game is bad". I won't say this game is [i]bad[/i], but it's definitely [b]not[/b] what it claims to be, which is a puzzle game. The game starts off with an intro sequence of a man (you) being abducted by aliens. You can overhear (and for no explainable reason, understand) two (presumable) aliens talking about you; the gist of it seems to be that this is supposed to be some sort of test to prove that humans are intelligent. (Never mind the fact that the abductee was driving a motor vehicle on a paved road, which would be an impressive feat if our species lacked the problem-solving abilities they seem to be testing for.) None of the rules of the puzzles are explained explicitly, except through hints that can be gleaned from the aforementioned overheard conversations between the two aliens. I don't see this as a problem -- in fact, it can be a hallmark of an excellent puzzle game; consider Myst, The Witness, and The Talos Principle -- all three dump you into their respective worlds without any explanation of what to do next, and it's on you to figure it out. Additionally, for some reason, the aliens have transplanted your brain/mind into some sort of robot body which is capable of doing things that human beings can't normally do. Several of the tutorial puzzles are meant to teach the player about these capabilities. Several of the early puzzles in .T.E.S.T. are even actual puzzles (most of the earliest puzzles are simply tutorials to demonstrate game mechanics), but the game soon gives way to things that I absolutely do not consider to be "puzzles", any more than the questions in my high school physics homework were "puzzles". I will elaborate on three particular puzzles that I feel demonstrate the "non-puzzle" nature of most of this game. [h1]Pool[/h1] (as in [i]billiards[/i], not [i]a place to swim[/i]) You are given two balls, and to clear the level, one must transport the red ball from one end of a bridge to the other. This would be straightforward, except you have to do this [i]without picking up the red ball[/i]; if you try to do so, you fail. You also can't move the red ball with your feet; you pass right through it. (But somehow you can stand on top of it. That mechanic isn't useful here.) The answer to this puzzle is that you must pick up the blue ball and throw it at the red ball to push it forward. However, you can't just push the red ball directly down the bridge. There are a bunch of barriers on the bridge, forcing you to move it in a zig-zag pattern. And if you throw the blue ball too hard and it pushes the red ball off of the bridge, you fail. (Also, if you don't catch the blue ball before it bounces and goes off of the bridge, you fail.) Failure here doesn't require restarting the whole thing; you can rewind to just before you made the throw and try it again. And again. And again. But again, this isn't solving a puzzle any more than calculating the force required to move an object was back in physics class. At least in physics, I knew the masses of the objects and the coefficients of friction and how to deliver the exact force required; here I have none of that, and no reasonable means to find out. I gave up on this one and went to do some other puzzles. [h1]Intersection[/h1] The "puzzle" aspect of this challenge is similar to that of "Pool". I need to get a red ball around a 90 degree turn. The solution to the puzzle is to the red ball exactly halfway down a corridor, so it lands in an intersection where I can hit it with a blue ball thrown down a crossing corridor, so I can pick up the red ball at the far end. If I don't throw the red ball hard enough, it doesn't land in the intersection and I have to try again. If I throw the red ball too hard, it doesn't land in the intersection and I have to try again. If I don't have the red ball land in a sweet spot of the intersection, then when I hit it with the blue ball, it won't go far enough and I won't be able to reach it and then I have to go all the way back to my throw of the red ball. Again: at least in high school physics, they gave me all the numbers -- mass, distance, coefficient of friction -- needed to compute how to make this happen. This one I actually solved. [h1]I forget the name of this one[h1] This is one of the "tutorial" puzzles, intended to teach the player about the "slow time" function (the V key). While V is held, the directional movement of all objects, including the player character, is dramatically slowed. What is evidently not slowed is rotational movement, because you can look around (and pick up objects) at full speed. The goal of this puzzle is to jump over a chasm and pick up three balls floating in the air near the apex of the jump, then carry them to the exit. It took several tries to time things so I had sufficient time to grab all three of them while they were within distance, but even after I had managed to pull that off consistently, I kept falling short of the jump. I still don't know what I did differently that actually let me land on the far side. [h1]Conclusion[/h1] There are definitely some puzzles here, but the ones I've seen were extremely simplistic. All of the difficulty I actually encountered was in correctly guessing the correct angle, distance, and thrust force required to execute the solution. The existence of the "rewind" game makes the game's unreasonable demands more bearable, but it doesn't make them reasonable -- or fun.
I feel like a rat, but I like it
Nice puzzle game
I'm completing Steam games in alphabetical order, and you can watch my review here: https://youtu.be/ZQUDsq2Rt10 Prefer to read? .T.E.S.T: is a first-person puzzle platformer in a similar vein to games like Portal or Antichamber, and uses a variety of mechanics including lifts, clones, coloured keys and gates, and time manipulation. All of the elements of a great game are here, and are individually quite clever, but are never combined in a way that really brings everything together into something greater than the sum of its parts, which is a shame. If first person puzzle-platformers are your jam you'll likely enjoy this, and even if not, I think it's worth a look as the devs clearly put quite a bit of effort into this. It's not perfect, but there's a handful of clever moments.
please, more of these games. This example shows how to make a simple and brilliant game.
Not worthy your time. It's a decent puzzle game but it has nothing really going for it. There are two kinds of puzzles, tedious puzzles that just frustrate you and aha puzzles. This game doesn't have any aha puzzles, it just has tutorial puzzles that teach you the mechanics and tedious puzzles that are more a testament to your dexterity and determination than they are your intelligence. And the story it has is just uninspired. If you aren't looking for that aha moment in a puzzle game and are ok with a more skill, as opposed to intelligence based, puzzle game you might want to give it a try. I know I won't ever be finishing this.
Thank you for this awesome game. Mindshifting
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time, reconstructed from Steam's monthly review histogram.
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| House of 1000 Doors: Family Secrets | $18.4K | 181 | 95% | $6.99 |
| Frontline: World War II | $18.4K | 58 | 86% | $11.99 |
| My Factory 我的工厂 | $18.4K | 78 | 53% | $6.99 |
| Alphabear: Hardcover Edition | $18.4K | 116 | 83% | $9.99 |
| Miracle Fly | $18.4K | 91 | 87% | $7.99 |
| Lost in Art: a Miniature Realm | $18.4K | 51 | 96% | $13.99 |