Old World

군 관련 스탯이 그닥 유기적으로 영향을 주는거 같지 않음

Great game, the family elements and stories were unexpectedly good and added a new dimension for me beyond just resource and expansion.

if civ 7 was good it would be like this

おすすめはしますが、civilizationのライト版のような感じで、CIVを上回っているかは微妙です。 ライトの意味は、勝敗は数時間のゲーム時間で決着します。1回のターンで命令数の制限があり、生産/軍事/内政/人事/外交命令が全て実行できないので、大国になっても1ターンに掛かる時間が短くなるのが大きな要因。このシステムにより命令に優先順位を付ける必要が出てくるのが、このゲームの大きな特長だと思います。 CIVの場合、プレーヤーが大国になると他国は戦争を仕掛けてきませんが、OLDは逆のパターンが多いような気がします。なのでゲーム後半に「このタイミングかよ」って攻められることが多々あります。 のようにCIVと比較しがちですが、CIVに飽きた人が偶にこちらをプレイすればお互いの良さ、悪さを見つけられるかと思います。 あとCIVとは進め方が少し違うので、CIV体験者はチュートリアルした方がよいです。

Weirdly fun for periods but incredibly overcomplicated, with every possible mechanic you can imagine. The art direction generally is not too terrible, but it has the feel of going a bit too overboard with fantasy/a.i. visuals for what is essentially a game about civilizations we know rather well, including the possible looks and sizes of their cities. Mountains of stone reaching the skies they were not. Worth a shot on sale given its just a few euros.

es un juegazo de lo mas adictivo.

not as good as Civ6, but still okay to play with.

Very interesting game. It's mostly like a civilization style game set in ancient times. Think roman/greek etc.. Then add in a layer of dynasty and unique characters, traits, intrigue.. It's a fun game and scratches the civ itch quite nicely.

jh

I became detatched from CIV since CIV 6, and OLD WORLD was presented as an alternative. Steepish learning curve for somebody used to CIV games, but it was worth the reward. The sheer number and weight of random events / Decision points to craft a dynastic narrative add a layer I didn't really realize CIV needed. ROME II had it a little too , with grooming heirs and gaining attributes, but the consequences seem more pronounced here. The benefit to the game is a little like the opening interest of finding abandoned ruins in CIV, but whereas in CIV they cease to happen and the thrill of early game scramble dies off, those random and consequential 'historical' events keep coming. You have choices to make usually, which makes those events more dynamic and 'choose-your-own-adventure-like'. The game doesn't make Idle Threats: My leader's sister fell in love with an idiot baffoon, I didn't allow her to marry, which I knew would upset her, but I was saving her for a political marriage with a neighboring tribe. WELL, she tried to assassinate me (Your living ruler), and although she failed, a coup with rebel armies sprung up. Most people talk about the orders and movement points- it IS interesting, but I don't think its nearly as impactful as the dynastic factors, OR the resource system. In a way it feels a little like an RTS in that you need to get enough wood, stone, iron, etc, to make xyz improvement or unit. ALL IN ALL, it is a successful alternative to CIv, a different, and more focused Civ, without the fluffy stuff for tourist players and dumbed down modern audiences. As I learn how to play (Im not fully competent yet), I find myself less likely to go back to CIV, which starts to look simplistic by comparison. Note Bene: The 'complexity' isn't about a million widgets - I have to mention that because in the first 30 min, thats what it felt like, because it does bombard with lots of game elements and modifyers- I don't think most of those really matter all that much unless you want them to. The *Critical* complexity over CIV is in a slightly deeper resource management way, and a Game-Of-Thrones surprise element which seems to upend whatever you thought was going to happen.