
This is a city building game with the historical background of the Tang Dynasty of China in the 7-8th century. In the game, you will build a prosperous city in the Tang Dynasty of China.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
About
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English, Simplified Chinese
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 40 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
This game is very much like an old Sierra game called Emperor. However the buildings are more detailed. The most noticeable feature is the market arrangements Anyone who has played Sierra will say yes i've seen that before. Do not let that put you off. The feeling's maybe the same but the game is not. Graphics and detail are excellent for games in this price range. When the game lights up at night you can not help but say wow. There is a call for soldiers so you people who like a bit of a scrap will not be dissapointed. It is a game that also has what most westerners do not have and what our far Eastern friends do have lots off and that's Patience so be warned because you will need it. If you wish to argue with my comments remember us old folks are not put off by a life sentence.
我要是龙之崛起游戏制作商,我一定告它!不是告他侵权,是告它损坏商业声誉,一个20多年前的游戏原封不动放那让它抄作业都抄的这么失败,龙之崛起要是出个重置版分分钟就能碾压。
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Hours played at review time, across 40 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
great game brings back memories of the Sierra games
个人很喜欢这种复古的体验。听闻开发者是故意为之的,很好,继续加油! 有两个小建议: 1. 环境范围(包括含水量、肥沃度)的显示没有明晰的界线,对建筑摆放比较讲究的情况不太友好; 2. 随着店铺的升级,粮店、瓷器店的在游戏中后期的商品吞吐量很高,战役中少数的农田是供不起的。比如一旦粮食供应不足就会造成整片房屋大幅降级,工人数量严重不足,想恢复生产的成本很高,如果再加上外敌入侵,体验真的会很不好。所以建议增加限制市场店铺储藏/出货量的功能,可以理解为“计划性供给”。 但其实最希望出现的是快捷键说明和按键自定义功能。每次游戏中,都会有很多建造、拆除、菜单查看的操作,但是现有的快捷键其实是需要自己摸索出来的(贸易调整的键我至今没找到),而且默认的几个快捷键个人感觉离左手太远了并不算好用。如果按键自定义在技术上不可行的话,还请对按键进行调整,比如说倍速用横排数字键1-3,环境、含水量,肥沃度用F1-F3,贸易调整F4或者T等等。
不知道为什么画面看着很难受,还不如龙之崛起画面那么舒服。货栈和市场简直是智障,货栈要点了才能收货,市场离货栈那么点距离,死活拿不到货物。感觉不是在玩种田游戏,而是在玩和面游戏,就是那种面多了放水,水多了放面的游戏。不是我想象的那种,我宁愿玩凯撒3,退款了
买这款游戏纯纯是因为没有龙之崛起可以买
希望未来加入沙盒模式,画面再精美点
龙之崛起换皮,还不如龙之崛起!39以下,就购买支持一下!
A homage to the old Sierra/Impressions games, in particular to [b]Emperor: Rise of the middle kingdom.[/b] It's good. Could be better, as it doesn't innovate much on the original formula, and the animations are a little coarse, but it's good and, above all, a pleasure to watch. The lamps illuminating your city at night are really pretty. Game runs well in Linux via Wine/Proton.
开元是一款高精度像素的仿古风城市建造游戏. [b]刚开始其实看到这个画面我还是比较震惊的,因为它看起来既不像我的世界那样的纯像素,啥也看不出来那种也不是那种鲜艳的如超级玛丽那种非常具有分辨性,反而是那种看起来非常模糊的高精密画面,不过调整分辨率之后呈现给我们的就是非常精密的像素画面了,虽然是比较复古但是看起来更加的舒适了。[/b] [h1]游玩过程[/h1] 本作的UI和画面相比略显简陋,颇有一种早年网游时代的风格。游戏中的建筑种类十分丰富,种类齐全,作用鲜明,不过有些建筑物需要考虑到各种作用范围以及特定用途常常需要放置在一起,形成一个个建筑群,具有非常明显的集群效应。 比如说有些建筑容易着火那么我们需要建造瞭望塔,进行观察;房屋要离水井近一些;农田、瓷窑要距离货栈近一些;医馆要离居民近一些等等。虽然看上去有些混乱但是其实是有章法可循的,我们唯一需要考虑的就是合理的布局与资源的利用情况。 如果在游玩的过程中我们觉得建筑缺乏美感,可以利用自带的绿植等进行美化,虽然第一个解锁的是粉色的桃树,也算是为单调的游戏进程增添些许乐趣了。 除了传统的建造城市,我们还会受到敌人的攻击,需要建造军营训练士兵,而士兵又需要铁制武器,因此周围还要有冶炼高炉或者能够储存铁的建筑。士兵的移动方式则是类似于王国保卫战,我们也同样可以操控一名主将。游戏内的可玩性还是挺不错的 [h1]小小缺点[/h1] 本作的画面比例还是挺失衡的,如果把分辨率调到最高各种UI和画面啥的都挺小,很难看到字样。如果将分辨率调低画面则难以接受,而且不能够实现全屏,看起来还是挺不舒服的。县衙的收税范围太小了,为了收税还要多建立几个县衙,让玩家的心理不能接受,毕竟古代一般只有一个县衙。 [h1]总结[/h1] 《开元》是一款需要兼协调来规划布局的游戏,本作的画质是一种高精度的复古画面,UI和场景设计比较粗糙,古代建筑的建模尚可,整场对局的游戏节奏十分缓慢,比较考验小伙伴们的耐心,感兴趣的小伙伴可以酌情入手。看着荒芜的土地在自己的手中不断繁荣强大,心中的成就感满满。 [quote=Lem0n juice] 笔墨写春秋,挥毫描秀色; 欢迎关注[url=https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44125219-Lem0n-juice/] Lem0n-juice [/url]~ 我们致力于游玩各类游戏并给出自己的意见供大家参考,欢迎加入我们的大家庭~[/quote]
Selling now
See how fast this game is selling right now — estimated copies and revenue per day from recent review growth.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $125.6K | 184 | 62% | $19.99 | |
| $6.9K | 76 | 76% | $4.99 | |
| $2.3K | 9 | 67% | $7.99 | |
| — | 0 | — | — | |
| $2.9M | 2.9K | 79% | $29.99 | |
| $762.5K | 757 | 74% | $24.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $27.7K | 452 | 65% | $3.49 | |
| $27.7K | 251 | 63% | $5.99 | |
| $27.7K | 53 | 85% | $19.99 | |
| $27.7K | 157 | 97% | $4.99 | |
| $27.7K | 119 | 66% | $9.99 | |
| $27.7K | 188 | 70% | $4.99 |