Case Solved: The London Files

E um jogo bem gostoso de se jogar, gostei da ambientação, da música, no mais é aquele tipo de jogo pra você destressar.

Eu curti jogar um jogo de investigaçao de modo simplificado. Se assemelha a um "puzzle investigativo" que acaba te prendendo na historia com pitadas de humor ácido.

It's a basic deduction game. What can go wrong? To start, to gather the clues you need to play a hidden object game. But the objects are not hidden very well. So you click on an object, wait to see an unfunny pun about the object, and congratulations: you now have found one totally unrelated clue for the puzzle that you are here for. Second: the grid where you enter your deductions is functional, but nothing more than that. You can enter answers, but you cannot remove incorrect options. The color-coding is nice though. Third: even though hand-crafted, the texts don't feel natural. (See below for an example.) The texts read like they could hold randomized clues. But they obviously don't. Fourth: all clues have a form of "if A then B", or variations thereof. There are no 'hidden' clues, like using the fact that a nephew cannot be female, or using any info from the story that surrounds the puzzles. E.g. we need to deduct that the clockmaker is the victim, even though the story made that clear already. It is fine to have a self-contained puzzle, but then why have the story at all? Fifth: a nice feature is that clues are automatically 'crossed out' when you are done with them (i.e. when you entered the relevant deduction). Less nice is that twice it crossed out a clue when it still contained some unused information. And sometimes it isn't crossed out when it could have. It would have been better if this could be done manually. Worse of all: in one case (3-4) there was an incorrect clue. "If whoever reported DOUBT believes in JAMMING, then the CLOCKMAKER reported CONFUSION; if not, the OFFICER reported CONTRADICTION." So "If A then B. If not A, then C." In this case, A is true, and we are supposed to conclude that C is false. But that is not how logic works. Note that several of these complaints (1/4/6) are specifically about the main story puzzles, that you can solve within two hours. There is also a set of 42 'classified' puzzles, which are just that: puzzles, without any hassle. Well, apart from the fact that each of these has to be unlocked by finding a code somewhere. Why...? So if you want a no-frills deduction game, stay away from this one.

페이퍼 마리오 느낌의 그래픽을 좋아하는 분들에게 추천합니다. 추리보다는 논리 퍼즐에 가까운데 증거 수집이 너무 간단해서 아쉬웠어요 특히 번역이 어색하기때문에 스토리를 추측해야합니다.

Jogo muito bom. Os casos são interessantes e a estética excelente.

Jeu simple et amusant.

Nice Puzzle Game hope for more dlc