Witching Stone

This has turned into one of my favorite roguelike games. It has so much personality, and there isn't another game that plays quite the same way. It's cool how much freedom you have - you don't have to pay any resources to change or remove things from your build, you can backtrack on the map, anything you want. And the 90's artstyle is great.

Hate not to like it, but it just misses the mark for the genre. Builds and developing them feels extremely sluggish, characters are vastly different from the start, up to the point where the second character is borderline unplayable if you don't get lucky on the first map since she starts with 0 defensive moves. Altogether, it seems extremely underbaked and I hate to say that, because the game certainly does have its charms and you can do interesting things with some of the badges, which essentially modify your spells. But again, some are like absolutely no brainers to take if you get them and others feel like they provide you with a minor advantage for massive drawbacks. I see the honest attempt to make something a bit different, which is commendable in the times of "formula X for the win", I don't see, however, the actual attempt to make the game good. Not sure if that comes from a lack of experience or unwillingness, but the base mechanics are solid and it should not be hard to go from there, but the top layer, which is where player agency is involved, feels like a bad attempt of a minimalistic card battler. Add to that, that this game is much RNG heavier than an actual card battler, it never feels good if you die because you get a rotten board right at the final boss when you most need it, while you went 95% of the game with that setup. Combined with extremely lazy boss/enemy mechanics (only boss with random second phase, while also the only boss that has a "max dmg/turn" shield in both phases), it feels consistently like the devs have no idea how to balance things or how to make the game interesting. Some enemies just literally get invul buffs that you need 2-3 turns to realistically clear off and that's just stupid and furthers the impression nobody actually tested the game. And to round it off, some things are just incredibly broken or unclear and either do not work as described or there seems to be a language barrier. In either case, not great for a 10$ game at this point. For that price, I at least expect that certain things are being correctly tracked in the game. "Beat the game with 2 characters to unlock (progress 0/2)", although I beat the game with a character.... stuff like that. It's like playing DnD with a stubborn 13 year old as a DM, that realised your character smokes everything in 95% of all cases, so they specifically craft a final boss that hard counters everything you do with zero chance of preparation or adaption on your side. That's the biggest gripe, once you are in battle, all things are set in stone, just luck involved. No way to adapt to new challenges or abilities. Doesn't feel good, because you essentially play a long fight for no other reason to lose, since you know you're done because the boss and the character's abilities are hard counters. There is a way to "view" the boss beforehand, but it doesn't tell you what they can actually do. So what's the point here? Altogether, it is a cute game, it certainly has a bit of novelty to it, but altogether, I fail to see any real attempt to fix the multiple issues this game has with balance, adaptability, overrealiance on RNG and very particular mechanics, boss design and character design. Hate not to love it, here's to hoping the devs work on it in the future, which is when I gladly will give it another spin. That being said: There is a demo, just don't think that there is more to it than there is in the demo. That's it, really. Sure, there are more levels, but they literally play the same. But if you like the demo, chances are good you enjoy this too. Would love to give it a ~, but steam forces me to give a thumbs down, at least for now. Positively, I cannot stress enough the eye for detail. Your spellbook is in the lower left corner and you immediately see defensive and offensive spells as they are denoted in different colours, even in the icon, without needing to open the book. It's details like that that make me hope these devs really do more and just get some experience in the market and genres they like to do, because, damn, there is potential here. A lot of cryptic stuff, badly worded items which is not clear how they work, e.g. "era" So please, do not think of me being harsh for no reason. You're doing good. Keep at it! Edit for the dev: Thanks for proving my point while focusing on some throwaway phrases that clearly go over your head while missing the essential part entirely. If you don't want to hear that the balancing of your battles is ♥♥♥♥, maybe work on that instead of pretending that the review "misses what dnd is", because fighting, like in your game *is* a huge part of the game and no attempt to focus on the collaborative RPG aspect will take away from the fact that the battles of the analogy are sh*t, like in your game. Not sure if there is a language barrier, but apparently you are unable to even understand the grievance. The adverserial element is part of YOUR game, genius, because that is how the game works, and it plays like YOU, the DM, does not understand how DnD works and thinks it's about "beating the party" that you let get too powerful, so you have to make your bosses frustrating by countering everything and every one. Not that hard to understand... Your answer shows that you are either not very good at reading or just don't want to get the point. So don't tell me about contingencies when the game barely gives you anything to work with in some instances, because you keep avoiding the entire issue that the game is vastly unbalanced, but then come here and go "lol, player dumb". Hard to build contingencies if the game fairly often gives you just enough ressources to make one attack strong enough, because nobody wants to fight a 60HP++ boss with two phases and hit them for 3 dmg each round just to have a contingency in case they are so horribly designed that you can barely do anything else with the other attack that you built up. So GTFO with that BS argument. For somebody unable to string together a working balance or understand the core issues, you start early taking a page from certain triple A CEOs when it comes to defending it. About the bosses: Yeah, like with items, the game does a piss poor job of giving any player feedback. It ends after the 3rd boss, not telling you anything about a 4th boss. Some items are completely unclear as well. You are not being cute or interesting, your game is obtuse and sometimes appears unable to string together a coherent sentence or give info. But sure, that is the player's fault too, I guess, because with you everything is. And contingencies are hard to build if the boss is random and can literally hard counter everything, so again, you balance is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ BS. The Problem is still RNG>>player agency. But please, by all means, think what you want, at least I don't feel quite as bad giving this game a bad review, seeing how far you are up your own ass. Also: healing is healing. It's not a defensive move, lol. Maybe start there, or play actually good card battlers. You seem to struggle with the fact that you put too much ♥♥♥♥ into your game with everything being half baked. Maybe start with just block and then go from there. Which I wrote above. Nice answer, really shows the immense lack of self awareness to actually pick up any criticism and go "no u". Your answer is more revealing than any negative review ever could be. Good job! The fact that you literally have negative reviews with much more upvotes, criticising the same issues, only shows that this is your ego speaking. Maybe actually read and think about it. Instead of getting worked up about one of the LEAST helpful reviews, take the issues that are talked about in all of them. Like this, you just appear as a cranky petulant child that pretends to be smarter than everyone at the table when it just shat itself while trying to convince everyone it didn't.

It's super satisfying when you get a hang of it! Pretty much every spell or badge that i initially decided to avoid, found its use in some build. Only sometimes you gotta remember what your spells did if their text doesn't fit in the box.

I had a chance to play this game in an indie game expo, and IT WAS A BLAST! If you like Into the Breach kind of tactical game, you would like this game as well.

This is a fresh take on the roguelite genre. Instead of a deck, you have a spellbook. You start with 2 spells and can go up to 6. They all start as available - no shuffling and drawing cards required. There is a gem grid that corresponds to the costs required to cast the spells. Connect the gems in the right sequences, and you cast the spell. The tutorial is pretty good, although there are a lot of mechanics at play, and it's sometimes difficult to figure out what is going to happen. The tooltips are quite good, but still sometimes it's hard to understand who (you or your opponent) will be affected by a spell. As you learn the mechanics on both sides, the gameplay becomes smoother. The spells light up when you're going to cast them, and the gem sequences also appear below your character. The placement is weird because you're staring at your spellbook, not looking below your character, so it's not easily noticed. Might be better placed somewhere inside the spellbook. As you click on the gems, it "highlights" the path, but the colors are sometimes difficult to differentiate from the regular board (the unselected gems). You can undo your selection one gem at a time with the right mouse button, which is very helpful. There are 6 characters. The first one is probably the easiest to play. The next two are easy to unlock. The next one is a bit more difficult to unlock. The last two are crazy difficult to unlock! I could see why some players would stop after 3 or 4 characters. I like that they all have different play styles and dialogue. I'm unsure if they have "class spells" (spells specific to the character), but I suspect they do, and that adds a nice bit of variety as well. There's a lot of content here! You'll be hooked for a while. There are also badges, which "upgrade" your spells. They're pretty good, but you can only equip a certain number (default 2) to each spell. You can unlock modifiers, which let you make the game easier or harder. You need to play the harder modifiers (think ascension mode) if you want the full experience (no spoilers here). I like that there are in-game "quests", which are mostly different from the Steam achievements, although there is some overlap. It lets you unlock new badges and starting decks for the characters. I think this is a great meta-game mechanic. As for balance, I found some of the characters very difficult to play. You need to have a good mix of attack and defense spells. Sometimes, there are no defensive spells that give you block or heal you, and then you just lose. I'm not sure if that's related to the character, or just RNG. Ok, I will try again! But it's not a great feeling. There are also some spells that I think, "Why would I ever use this?". Maybe I'm just missing something. There are some modifiers that are like, "How would this ever be fun?". Overall, the starting / act 1 spells are rather weak, and they get better the farther into the run you go, so in that regard, it is well balanced. I like the maps being open such that you can go back to nodes after exploring further (but not once you proceed to the next act/map). For example, you might be given a choice of spell, but there's also a shop coming up and want to explore that first - you can! You can also save rest sites for when you need them, which is awesome. I like the blessings - all good choices which make a big impact on your gameplay. The core gameplay loop is solid. Aside from sometimes being very confused about what happened (no history tiles), the game is great and pretty addictive. I think the design is spot on, even if some of the characters are more frustrating than others. Overall excellent, and would definitely recommend!

This is a great and underrated game. I found character unlocks and secrets such as this to be extremely fun, overall this is a great puzzle rpg and i wish there were more games like this. This game is insanely fun and i would recommend it to any rpg puzzle enjoyer. I also hope one day we will get something alike to Witching Stone 2. Props to the developers!

I was looking for a match-3 game to sink a few hours into and instead stumbled over this gem. Really excellently designed combat with a fair amount of flexibility and more depth than is initially apparent. The game deserves more attention, for sure! You could always start out by giving the demo a go.