
You're a programmer. Your cat is a better one. Solve visual puzzles built from real machine learning ideas, from decision trees to neural networks, to create a cat-to-human translator. Take freelance jobs, upgrade your rig, gamble on startups, dress up the cat. No coding required, curiosity is.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Prices
Each in the currency that store quoted — not converted: the gap between two rows is the publisher's pricing, not an exchange rate.
Discounts
Every price cut of more than 20% we have observed, in each market that quoted one, with this game's chart position on either side of it. These are episodes, not a model: a sale is one event, and one event cannot tell you what the next one will do.
Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 1/day in the week to Sep 10 → 5/day in the week after.
For scale, across Steam · Top Sellers · Brazil over the last 30 days: the 25 chart moves that followed a price cut of more than 20% went a median of 10 places towards #1, and the 2,413 moves with no price cut behind them went 2 away. One store, one chart, one country — it is the only place we have enough observations to say even that.
Prices outside the United States have been collected since 6 August 2026 and chart positions since 19 July 2026, so a cut older than that has no market to compare and a market that joined later has no history yet. Nothing here is converted between currencies.
About
Add-ons
Each DLC is estimated with the same model as a game, then summed — a modeled figure, not reported DLC sales.
Sums Steam + Google Play only; PlayStation, GOG, Xbox, Epic, Nintendo publish no volume signal, so the true total is higher by an unknown amount.
| Store | Price | Audience | Score | Chart | Est. revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SteamYou are here | $7.79−40% | 8.2Kreviews | 91% | — | $1.7M |
| $4.99 | 1.2Kratings | 96% | — | $135.3K | |
Updates
Build ids and update times come straight from Steam's PICS — the same source SteamDB reads. Patch history grows as we record new builds.
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 840 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
This game is… boring. It’s strange to give this a thumbs down, when this game is over 90% recommended. But all this game got going for itself is the aesthetics. I like programming games, especially the educational kind. And this game just fails to teach me anything. It sprinkles you with data science and machine learning history facts with its lore. But the gameplay does not keep up. It’s just a bunch of load balancing puzzles where you try to filter and distribute colors, shapes and other pieces of data to satisfy the requirements on a bunch of outputs. Over and over again. And it does not feel like I am accomplishing anything nor growing with it. It feels like repetition and permutation for the sake of it. There’s other programming and educational games on Steam that have good aesthetics, gameplay and also teach something. Can’t recommend this.
很好的烧脑游戏 要是角色可以选择性别就好了 不想要生活中都默认程序员是男性 女性程序员也是有的啊!
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Every market we collect.
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English, Russian, German, Hungarian, Korean, Greek, Portuguese - Brazil, Simplified Chinese, Polish, French, Italian, Spanish - Spain +20 more
| $14.99 |
| 63ratings |
| 80% |
| — |
| not modelled |
| $12.99 | 34ratings | 62% | — | not modelled |
| $14.99 | 26ratings | 94% | — | not modelled |
| $12.99 | — | 90% | — | not modelled |
| $12.99 | — | — | — | not modelled |
Matched by title — a reused name can pair the wrong games. * is a critic aggregate. Prices and positions are each store's United States storefront; Epic charts worldwide. Audience and Score too, except Steam's, which is worldwide.
Hours played at review time, across 841 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
I want to love it, I really do. But it's just not an ML game, which was always my hope. It's a light statistical model game that is themed after ML methods that were contemporary seven years ago- and I played it then and was underwhelmed by how loose the connection was. This is an inherently biased no review, I will admit. If you just want a zachlike themed after ML and don't care if it's method-accurate, you might have a better time.
[h1] 营销号别再用编程噱头来让人坐牢了[/h1] 目前玩过第二牢的游戏,剧情等于没有,比较空,我一般忽略不计,主要是其中的玩法,不懂为什么这能和编程扯上关系。 想通过这个游戏学习的可以避雷了,基本是白日做梦,不能说完全学不到,只能说是什么也没学到,重复的益智类游戏,建议直接去b站搜编程教程更实在,游戏只提供一些名词解释和模拟,玩法上更像是简化后的机器人编程,但是说真的,你去编程比玩这游戏有趣多了!这游戏在我这里算是同类游戏中最烂。。。 不喜欢重复玩法,又主要是报着学习想法的小伙伴,绕道!别买!免费领的话那就算了
1. You need to buy upgrades to achieve gold medals in some cases 2. This game teaches you bad habits (if you plan to use this game for coding logic) 3. The game is basically a themed puzzle game, with only 10% real coding logic behind the gold medal solutions The whole theme baited me into buying this game. Its just a few ML facts while going through the puzzles that don't even represent basic coding logic. Most solutions are just spaghettified to achieve gold medals. You have to advance through many puzzles to buy all the upgrades, then go back and run the same exact code to get the gold medal. The game is just a waste of time with no actual educating aspect. Its totally fine just as a node puzzle, but making this an ML theme and adding "programming, education" tags is misleading.
As a programmer, I stopped having fun after understanding the core of the pattern matching. RL is just minmaxing. Start-ups are broken. The gameplay loop becomes increasingly annoying and samey. Nothing is learnt. I'd rather learn actual machine learning than play this.
I thought this game was about machine learning. Just an easy puzzle game where you learn nothing. Also it's buggy as hell. Sometimes, especially in your startups you can't reuse your components. You have to rebuild them completely. And the parallelization doesn't work as you would expect.
My cat bought this game using my credit card and forced me to play this. On a serious note, while this game oversimplifies everything. It is still a good introduction to someone who is new to programming world and catch up with the technologies. But if you are familiar with the world of programming and its technologies, this game is just another puzzle game.
the rorex company task is broke at the moment, as there is not enough data. it has been mentioned in the discussions a year ago, devs seem to ignore it. it's gamebreaking, you can't finish without the task :(
I love the concept and idea of this game, and I would give it a wholehearted thumbs up if not for one very frustrating thing: as you move up to higher levels you soon realize that the answers are very messy and inefficient. It becomes really unsatisfying to be given a clear-cut output requirement, and then learn that the gold medal solution is to intentionally do a few things wrong. It just doesn't sit well with me, with a game like this you want the solutions to feel tidy and logical and the "right" answer. You don't want sloppy mistakes to actually lead to better achievements.
Active players
Estimated daily and monthly active players (DAU/MAU) modeled from peak concurrency.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Players also reviewed
The games this title's players most often review too — audience affinity.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | 34 | 62% | $12.99 | |
| — | 0 | — | — | |
| $109.2K | 158 | 93% | $12.59 | |
| $199.5K | 321 | 92% | $14.99 | |
| $113.4K | 182 | 75% | $14.99 | |
| $23.9K | 31 | 100% | $19.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.7M | 31.6K | 84% | $3.99 | |
| $1.7M | 3.5K | 93% | $19.99 | |
| $1.7M | 2.5K | 72% | $19.49 | |
| $1.7M | 5.9K | 83% | $14.99 | |
| $1.7M | 2.2K | 89% | $19.99 | |
| $1.7M | 5.6K | 42% | $17.99 |