Three Kingdoms: Innovatory

玛德 跑路了还不下架的游戏

经典老中跑路游

其实这游戏 还可以 可惜跑路了，真的可惜了，我觉得比三国志十三好玩点 ，但这游戏是个半成品

骗钱跑路 还想收割韭菜

老是闪退，服了

日你女马，退钱！

赛博烂尾楼，垃圾游戏

開發者已經浪杠23個月囉！

创造三国志 is an ambitious large-scale strategy title that seeks to reinterpret the familiar Three Kingdoms era through a blend of grand strategy planning and massive battlefield engagements. Developed by 瞬息万变工作室 and published by Moment HK, the game positions itself as a sandbox of historical possibility, where players are invited not only to reenact famous campaigns, but to reshape the fate of fractured China through their own strategic choices. From the outset, it is clear that the project aims high, prioritizing scale and systemic breadth over immediate polish. The strategic layer forms the backbone of the experience. Players choose a faction during key historical starting points and are tasked with managing territory, resources, officers, and diplomatic relationships. Cities must be developed to sustain armies, resources must be balanced between expansion and defense, and political decisions often carry long-term consequences. Diplomacy plays a meaningful role, allowing alliances, ceasefires, and betrayals that reflect the instability of the era. While these systems echo established Three Kingdoms strategy traditions, 创造三国志 emphasizes player agency, encouraging experimentation rather than rigid adherence to historical outcomes. Combat is where the game’s ambition becomes most apparent. Battles are designed to unfold on a massive scale, with enormous armies clashing simultaneously across wide terrain. The sense of commanding thousands of soldiers at once can feel impressive, especially when formations collide and the battlefield becomes a chaotic blend of movement, morale shifts, and tactical positioning. Terrain, unit composition, and timing all influence outcomes, rewarding players who plan carefully rather than relying solely on numerical superiority. At the same time, the sheer scale can occasionally reduce clarity, making it difficult to read engagements or issue precise commands in the heat of battle. The transition between strategic planning and real-time combat is central to the game’s identity. Decisions made on the campaign map—such as supply routes, recruitment priorities, and officer assignments—directly affect battlefield performance. Officers play a particularly important role, functioning as force multipliers whose placement and survival can dramatically change the flow of combat. This connection between macro-strategy and micro-execution is one of the game’s strongest conceptual elements, reinforcing the feeling that victories are earned through preparation rather than reflex alone. Visually, 创造三国志 presents a utilitarian but serviceable style. Unit models, environments, and interface elements prioritize functionality and scale over dramatic flair. While battles can look impressive from a distance due to the number of units involved, close-up detail and animation quality remain relatively modest. The interface, though information-dense, can feel overwhelming at first, especially for players new to complex strategy games. Over time, however, familiarity makes navigation smoother, and the emphasis on clarity over spectacle begins to feel intentional rather than lacking. As an Early Access title, the game’s rough edges are noticeable. Balance issues, inconsistent AI behavior, and limited onboarding can sometimes disrupt immersion. Some systems feel underexplained, requiring players to learn through trial and error rather than guided tutorials. That said, the underlying structure shows promise, and the developers’ willingness to iterate based on feedback suggests a long-term vision rather than a static release. For players accustomed to Early Access development cycles, these imperfections may feel like growing pains rather than fatal flaws. Community reception reflects this tension between potential and execution. Players who enjoy deep strategy systems and are willing to tolerate incomplete features often praise the game’s scale and ambition, while others express frustration with its current lack of refinement. This divide underscores the game’s identity as a passion project aimed at a niche audience that values systemic depth and historical context over immediate accessibility. Ultimately, 创造三国志 is a game driven by aspiration. It does not yet offer the polish or clarity of long-established Three Kingdoms franchises, but it compensates with scope, freedom, and a willingness to attempt something grand. For strategy enthusiasts fascinated by large-scale warfare and the political complexity of the Three Kingdoms period, it offers a compelling—if imperfect—framework to explore alternative histories. In its current form, it is best approached as an evolving strategy sandbox, one that rewards patience and curiosity while hinting at greater potential still to come. Rating: 6/10

玩吧，玩了才知道，游戏的设置细节方面还是可以的。首先，我几十款游戏，愿意评价的就这一个游戏，起码我是真心喜欢这个游戏的。其次，细节真心可以，当你有一个城或者两三个城的时候，跟同样一个只有两三个城的诸侯打局部战争，这个游戏也无可挑剔的，但是对我这么一个收集癖的人来说，后期大战略时代跟占了四分之一城池甚至更多城市的诸侯打起来就很头疼了，一个20万士兵7个虎将的城，4，5个回合能让电脑掀掉，后来发现，守将只能守一次城，一回合打你两次就是电脑校尉在打了，白白十几万兵只能出来5，6千。电脑100多个将跟我打全面战争全TM都是校尉，一出来几百支部队。你要么别有校尉，有校尉要么校尉按比例拥有主帅的属性和带兵数，你这样搞我一个收集癖全部都是猛将谋士的玩家，给电脑要搞死。其次外交，有钱就行，我跟电脑结盟十几年，贸易十几年，经常同盟贸易状态，然后友好度是红色那个啥的，脱盟以后，我的使者还在路上，他就跟我宣战了，搞得我几线作战，真应了那句，电脑都是白眼狼。最后招募系统，我不知道怎么搞的，反正从头到尾，刘备给灭了，我是怎么都招不来刘备的，让我个收集癖玩家心里总有点不舒服。反正这游戏对收集癖玩家很不友好，如果你喜欢收集名将割据一方，还是等更新吧，其次群是没人管的，申请了不加新人不通过，你的意见反馈不上去的，且玩且珍惜。翻了一下，好像是不更新了，虽然喜欢但是不推荐。