
Lead a Three Kingdoms warlord in a turn-based grand strategy simulation focused on logistics, diplomacy, officer management, and large-scale warfare.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
About

Three Kingdoms Classic is a turn-based grand strategy game based on the historical records of the late Han dynasty and the Three Kingdoms era. Through cities, officers, diplomacy, supply lines, and battlefield commands, you will guide a faction through an age of chaos.
The front line does not move by the sword alone. Deciding which city to relieve, which officer to trust with logistics, and whether to fight or hold your ground can gradually redraw the borders of the realm. You can take command of a faction and aim for unification, or watch the wars and diplomacy of AI-controlled factions unfold in Observer Mode.
The realm did not split into three kingdoms overnight. From the Anti-Dong Zhuo Coalition and the rise of regional warlords to Guandu, the aftermath of Chibi, Liu Bei as King of Hanzhong, Wuzhang Plains, and the fall of Shu Han, each scenario offers a different balance of factions, officer deployments, front-line pressure, and historical events.

Three Kingdoms Classic represents each era with names, roles, and faction structures suited to that point in history. The same region may appear under a different name depending on the scenario, just as Yufu later became Yong’an, and Moling became Jianye.
Officers are also designed around their recorded deeds and historical roles rather than only their familiar popular images. Xiahou Dun excels as a commander who supports rear-area stability and logistics, while Zhang He shines through mobility and battlefield judgment. Historical grounding is reflected not only in background text, but also in city names, officer roles, abilities, and strategic use.
Cities on the map are more than territories to occupy. Population, gold, food, troops, public order, economy, agriculture, and logistics determine how long a war can be sustained. You must decide which cities to defend, where to gather troops, and where supplies should be sent.
If public order collapses, the risk of rebellion rises. If the front grows too long, reinforcements and supply transport take time. More important than winning the battle in front of you is whether you can still afford that victory next month.
Behind every stat sheet is a person. Officers are not judged by combat ability alone. Their roles, personalities, traits, loyalty, relationships, biographies, and achievements all influence the front.
Strategists support supply lines and schemes. Fierce warriors lead attacks and defenses. Political officers strengthen city administration and diplomacy.
You can grant offices and titles to officers who distinguish themselves, preserving their loyalty and rewarding their service. You can also consider relationships and personalities when recruiting, negotiating with prisoners, or deciding their fate. Gaining a talented officer can matter longer than winning a single battle.

Attackers and defenders each choose their commands. In sieges, field battles, set-piece engagements, gate battles, and mountain battles, walls, high ground, supply lines, weather, morale, provisions, officer personalities, and traits can all lead to different outcomes.
Fire attacks, confusion, lures, supply raids, gate defense, and retreats can become decisive moves — or costly mistakes. A larger army does not always win. Which officer you place at the front, where you hold, and when you withdraw can change the course of battle.
This time, even Ma Su may have another chance. In mountain battlefields such as Jieting, high ground, supply lines, and the commander’s judgment can alter the tide. Take Ma Su’s place on the mountain and try to overturn the result of Jieting yourself.
A direct assault is not the only path to victory. Dangerous routes such as the Ziwu Valley, Yinping Trail, Han River routes, and river crossings or mountain paths in Jiangdong can give you a chance to strike behind enemy lines. But harsh routes reduce troops and morale, and if discovered, they may be cut off. History is not already decided.

Truces, alliances, joint invasions, requests for aid, recruitment, prisoner treatment, surrender and vassalage proposals, relations with non-Han tribes, and historical events can be as important as war itself. Instead of attacking immediately, you may buy time. By persuading a capable officer, you may change the outcome of the next battle.
A good truce saves your army. A bad truce merely tells you the exact date of the next betrayal. Who you join hands with, and who you delay, can redirect the arrows on the front line.
Taking the realm is one thing. Holding it is another. A faction must manage not only territory, but also legitimacy. Offices and titles, relations with the Han court, imperial accession, abdication, and post-unification choices can all leave different endings for your campaign.
Your campaign can be reviewed through replays and historical records. The orders you gave, the deeds of your officers, and the rise and fall of factions remain as part of the record.

Multiple historical scenarios covering major periods from the late Han dynasty to the end of the Three Kingdoms era
Historical maps and data reflecting era-specific city names, faction structures, and officer deployments
Strategic systems linking domestic administration, logistics, public order, food, and troop management
Officer data based on historical records, including roles, personalities, traits, loyalty, relationships, biographies, and achievements
Turn-based battles divided into sieges, field battles, set-piece engagements, gate battles, and mountain battles
Risk-and-reward operations through difficult routes such as the Ziwu Valley and Yinping Trail
Diplomacy and personnel management, including truces, alliances, joint invasions, aid, recruitment, prisoners, and vassalage
Historical events and alternate-history settings triggered by specific conditions
Custom officers and new faction options
Observer Mode for watching AI factions develop on their own
Campaign replays and historical records
Three Kingdoms Classic values long-term judgment over quick decisions.
A single city’s food shortage can collapse a front. A single officer’s defection can shift the balance of the realm.
Write the next chapter of the age of chaos with your command.
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Add-ons
Each DLC is estimated with the same model as a game, then summed — a modeled figure, not reported DLC sales.
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 102 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
삼빠인데 1시간 깔짝해본게 전부지만,참신하네요.앞으로도 많은 업데이트를 통해서 퀄리티적으로 섬세한 게임이 완성되길 기대해봅니다.그리고 umpc로 누워서 편안하게 즐기고 싶은데 게임패드로 조작도 가능해졌으면 좋겠네요.
가볍게 즐기기 좋은 삼국지 클래식 근데 코삼처럼 생각없이 관직 퍼주면 금이 쪽쪽 빨려서 감당이 안됨 관직은 걍 봉인하고 하는게 편할듯
코에이 보다 전략성이 더 좋다고 봄 삼국지14만큼 재밌었음. 분발해라 코에이;;;
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Languages: Korean, English, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese
Hours played at review time, across 102 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
삼국지 덕후로써 많은 기대를 하고 구매했지만.. 그래서 그런가 좀 많이 아니었음 일단 브금이 너무 평화로워서 삼국지라는 난세에 안어울린다. 이건 부가적인거라 그렇다쳐도, 너무 현실적인 게임을 만들고 싶어한 것의 부작용? 징병을 하면 치안이 하락한다 이후 몇 달동안은 징병 못하게 인게임에서 훈수둔다 자유도에서 한참 떨어진 느낌이 강하게 들었다 장수들 능력치를 숨겨놨는데 나도 숨겨놓으면 좀 현실감들고 몰입좋을라나 했는데 오히려 장수들 개성이 사라진 느낌이라 인게임에선 얘가 뭔 장점이 있고 얘가 뭔 단점이 있는지 구분이 안가서 재미가 사라진다 능력치를 숨겨놓을 생각이었으면 좀더 장수들을 사람처럼 만들어서 별의별 이벤트를 넣는다는가 생동감을 부여했어야하는데 실패한듯. 전투는 일종의 카드게임인데... 뭐 어떻게 돌아가는지도 모르겠고 심심하다 삼국지는 전쟁이 백미요 전략짜는 재미가 있는건데, 직접 실시간 전투가 아니니 카드게임이 전략적으로 흥미를 유발해야하건만 진영 카드가 여러개 있긴한데 거기서 거기 느낌이라 뭘 써도 별 차이가 안 느껴진다 그리고 좀 불편한거는 장수들마다 특기가 붙어있는데 커서를 대면 그 특기에 대한 설명이 떠야하는데 못본다 자기 도시에서만 별도로 열람해야 볼수있는데 열람해도 설명이 뭐라는지.. 그뭔씹 느낌이라 이해불가하다 코에이가 욕을 먹어도 괜히 삼국지게임에선 코에이 소리 듣는게 아니었다 이 게임에 전체적인 인상은 굉장히 슴슴...하고 긴장감이 없고 뭐.. 그런 느낌
Its the closest to the simple original. i like it!
1인 개발임을 감안한다면 믿기지 않을 정도로 잘 만든 미니멀리즘 삼국지 게임. (좋은 비교 대상은 아니지만) 코에이의 삼국지 8 리메이크보다 10배는 더 재미있음. 저렴한 가격 대비 충분히 플레이할 가치가 있다는 전제 하에서 아래는 몇 가지 아쉬운 점. 1. 분명 정식 발매인데 얼리 억세스 느낌으로 발매 후 단기간에 게임 시스템이 자꾸 바뀜. 계속 조금씩 발전한다는 측면에서는 긍정적으로 볼 수도 있겠지만, 초기 구매자를 유료 베타 테스터로 만드는 최근 게임업계의 관행에는 찬성하기 어렵다. (그나마 1인 개발이라서 관대하게 넘어가기로...) 2. 개선했다고는 하지만 최적화 문제가 여전함. 특히 후반부로 가면 도대체 무엇 때문인지 전쟁 포로 한 명 처분하는데 10초씩 걸림. 3. 제갈량이 이렇게 무능하게 나오는 삼국지 게임은 처음. 아무리 정사 기반이라지만, 제갈량 전술이 모조리 B급이라고??? 전투에서 별로 쓸모가 없...었는데 최근 업데이트로 전술 예측력이 좋아진 것 같기도 함. (그 전까지는 데리고 다녀도 한번도 적 전술을 미리 알려 준 적이 없었음...) 4. 기본적으로 가위바위보 시스템에 입각한 전투 시스템은 나름 재미는 있는데, 역시 계속 하다 보면 파훼법이라는 게 일정한 패턴을 따르게 마련이라서 결국은 질리게 되기 쉬움. (그럼에도 코에이 삼국지들과 비교할 때 이것이 큰 단점이라고 할 수는 없거나 오히려 장점일 수도 있는 것이, 코에이 삼국지의 SRPG식 전투는 적 AI가 좋으면 아주 재미있어질 수 있지만, 문제는 코에이 삼국이 AI는 전반적으로 아주 구리다는 것.) 5. 신규 장수 설정이 너무 제한적임. 관계 설정이나 상성 설정까지는 안 바라더라도 심지어 생년 설정조차 안 되다니... 6. 관리해야 할 도시가 늘어나면 도시와 장수 관리가 다소 불편함. 특히 각 도시마다 장수가 있는지 없는지 손쉽게 확인이 안 되고, 지도상에서 도시에 커서를 대면 장수의 숫자가 나오긴 하지만 재야 장수, 이미 출병한 장수, 이동중인 장수 전부 포함된 값이라 실제 도시를 담당할 장수가 있는지 일일이 클릭해서 확인해야 함.
说实话,这游戏目前还相当简陋,内容十分匮乏! 大部分时间,几乎无事可做…… 虽然还有很多不足,但考虑到是个人独立开发,价格不高。 并且对三国真实历史的研究与热爱,积极与玩家沟通尽力更新完善等因素。 还是无法给予负评~ 所以,有兴趣的玩家可以尝试一下,不同风格的三国志游戏。 PS:但作者设定的IF朝鲜武将数值与能力,即使尊重,也实在无法理解和苟同……
カジュアルな三国志SLG めちゃくちゃ面白い訳ではないが まあまあ面白いです お値段分の満足感は十分あるとは思います トレーラーやサンプル画像を見て分かるように合戦や攻城戦はコマンド選択式 個人的には これは高評価ポイント 合戦に時間がかかる国盗りSLGは好みではないので… リリース以降 頻繁にアプデが入っています バグが気になる方は アプデが落ち着くまで様子見がいいかもしれません
Good old style three kingdoms game. Would recommend if you want a simple old style three kingdoms game with better graphics. Devs are responding quite fast with bugs and gameplay input. I would love if the devs would provide more in depth guide later.
这是一款关于制作人左右脑互搏的游戏,不推荐购买。最大的问题是,他硬是要让你兵少不能打赢兵多的一方,而且士气问题讨论反馈2个星期,仍然没发现自己问题,仍要一根筋两头堵。我全战能打史诗大捷,光荣三国志和信野系列能做到无伤或者低伤获胜。好家伙,你自称历史向三国志,结果你连兵少能够获胜都不敢承认?玉璧之战、张巡守睢阳、李光弼河阳之战、李世民一战擒双王、淝水之战等等,更别说合肥之战张辽怎么用800骑兵冲垮孙十万。到你这里,我兵少就要吃瘪?克制成功没有任何大的士气打击正反馈。那你不如干脆取消卡牌,你的基本盘不是战术和阵型之间的博弈为主,别告诉我你还把其他问题算作主要因素,那你怎么解释历史上以少胜多的例子?你这不就是纯纯左右脑互搏,一边按历史现实做,一边又否定历史。作为SLG游戏,玩家通常在后期都喜欢玩小势力破局,好家伙到你这里我小势力就心甘情愿被大势力吊打,没错你可以用政治其他手段破局,但是为什么战争却不行?张鲁这种小势力,开局就被曹操灭了,拿什么外交?多回合车轮战上来,一点手段都没,怎么降低自身损失,击败对面。你的游戏目前原罪就在这里,我看到的不是一个制作人的诚恳和尊重历史的态度,而是一个否定历史的傲慢。 我一开始还夸这个游戏是近几年做的比较好的三国类SLG,但是是事实是在发售没多久,作者把正式版发售的战斗核心公式给推倒重做。玩家体验不要了,没见过一款正式版发售一个月都没有的游戏,会将自己的底层代码重做,而且游戏最初版本这方面并没有什么大问题,而且这款游戏主打一个轻量化,符合这个价位,但是制作人的后续操作我实在看不懂,以后恐怕只会更多。虽然更新频繁,但是问题也多。其中就包括士气这个问题。 如果你是想体验运筹帷幄,史诗大捷,享受战术克制类的SLG游戏,建议换一个。 最后一句,我是撒币!
Selling now
See how fast this game is selling right now — estimated copies and revenue per day from recent review growth.
Active players
Estimated daily and monthly active players (DAU/MAU) modeled from peak concurrency.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Players also reviewed
The games this title's players most often review too — audience affinity.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $12.3K | 20 | 100% | $13.99 | |
| $412 | 1 | 100% | $11.99 | |
| $74 | 1 | 100% | $1.99 | |
| $1.7M | 868 | 81% | $59.99 | |
| $950.8K | 422 | 82% | $59.99 | |
| $254.5K | 328 | 74% | $19.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $64.1K | 90 | 46% | $19.99 | |
| $64.1K | 180 | 86% | $19.99 | |
| $64.1K | 95 | 92% | $34.99 | |
| $64.1K | 95 | 95% | $34.99 | |
| $64.1K | 191 | 79% | $5.99 | |
| $64.1K | 180 | 96% | $14.99 |