Kick some grass in Plants vs. Zombies: Battle for Neighborville, the wackiest shooter yet!
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Each in the currency that store quoted — not converted: the gap between two rows is the publisher's pricing, not an exchange rate.
14 of 15 markets; the rest we haven't asked for this title, not markets where it is unavailable.
Availability
We put this game to every storefront we collect. A market that answered not sold has told us something about the game; a market we never asked has not, and the two are never drawn the same.
Discounts
Every price cut of more than 20% we have observed, in each market that quoted one, with this game's chart position on either side of it. These are episodes, not a model: a sale is one event, and one event cannot tell you what the next one will do.
Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 0.57/day in the week to Sep 14 → 1/day in the week after.
About
Add-ons
Each DLC is estimated with the same model as a game, then summed — a modeled figure, not reported DLC sales.
Sums Steam only; PlayStation publishes no volume signal, so the true total is higher by an unknown amount.
| Store | Price | Audience | Score | Chart | Est. revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SteamYou are here | $8.99−70% | 18.8Kreviews | 71% | — | $3.3M |
| $19.99 | 37.8Kratings | 83% | — | not modelled |
Matched by title — a reused name can pair the wrong games. * is a critic aggregate. Prices and positions are each store's United States storefront; Epic charts worldwide. Audience and Score too, except Steam's, which is worldwide.
Updates
Build ids and update times come straight from Steam's PICS — the same source SteamDB reads. Patch history grows as we record new builds.
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 913 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
Embora tenha tido quedas óbvias comparado ao seu antecessor(O GW2) e até mesmo algumas quedas comparado ao GW1, como a total remoção de variações/classes diferentes de zumbis para serem substituídas apenas por skins quaisquer, ou a remoção do modo Jardins & Cemitérios, e o Operação Jardim/Operação Cemitério ficando mais simples, ele ainda sim é um ÓTIMO jogo, meio frustrante comparado à tudo que foi removido que tinham nos seus antecessores de 2014 e 2016, e que o jogo poderia ter sido bem melhor(sério o jogo consegue ter o dobro de Microtransações e até P2W mais que o GW2) ainda diverte, e é o mais bonito dos 3 jogos Shooter, vai de gosto se os redesigns agradam ou não, como a PopCap Vancouver foi fechada em 2021, esse jogo e outros da linha shooter não recebem mais updates ou um suporte competente, então igualmente aos outros 2, você pode encontrar Hackers ou ter problemas de balanceamento e etc, e aí vem o porém, esse jogo é um PORRE de encontrar salas multiplayers, até mesmo no seu lançamento, para exemplo de comparação já achei salas cheias no GW1(2014) e GW2(2016) e a única vez que encontrei pessoas para jogar foram somente 4 e completou times com os bots, é meio deplorável isso, e triste, pois embora eu prefira mais o GW2, o BFN ainda é um JOGÃO, que entrega um baita multiplayer divertido, mas é quase IMPOSSÍVEL se jogar no Online, então diria que se vc busca conteúdo, online e etc recomendaria o GW2 ou até mesmo o GW1, mas se vc busca um jogo até que de conforto, ou para jogar com amigos de uma maneira MENOS caótica que GW1 e GW2, esse jogo se encaixa perfeitamente, mesmo trazendo alguns novos modos e modos anteriores, ele consegue ser bem menos caótico, cheio de tiroteio e etc, e não acho isso ruim, mas é isso, no geral: PvZ BFN é um jogo que entrega vários downgrades comparado aos seus antecessores, mas que ainda sim mantém a diversão que os jogos anteriores dessa saga garantem, no mais, recomendo ainda mais o GW2 se vc busca MAIS do que viu no GW1 e talvez no BFN(se vc comprou ele antes) então digo que Plants Vs. Zombies Battle For Neighborville é um 7,5/10, recomendo
Media
Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $3.2M | 4.4K | 87% | $24.99 | |
| $3.2M | 4.3K | 83% | $24.99 | |
| $3.2M | 5.5K | 89% | $29.99 | |
| $3.2M | 3.2K | 70% | $29.99 | |
| $3.2M | 5.5K | 80% | $19.99 | |
| $3.2M | 6K | 83% | $34.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $4.5K | 21 | 67% | $9.99 | |
| $8.3M | 50.6K | 90% | $8.99 | |
| — | 0 | — | — | |
| $0 | 0 | — | Free | |
| $72.4K | 712 | 76% | $4.99 | |
| $14.7K | 101 | 42% | $7.49 |
14 on sale1 answered “not sold”0 we did not ask
The 1 “not sold” market is read from the Steam price pass of Aug 24: that day the store answered for this game elsewhere and gave no price there. The 14 priced markets are the same rows as the table above — each the latest price we hold, dated here when it is older than that pass. The 0 marked “not asked” were not put to this store at all — either it has no storefront there or we do not collect it yet, and neither is a statement about the game. A refusal is a refusal on one day; a store can list a title again tomorrow.
Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 0.86/day in the week to Jul 30 → 3.43/day in the week after.
For scale, across Steam · Top Sellers · Brazil over the last 30 days: the 24 chart moves that followed a price cut of more than 20% went a median of 9 places towards #1, and the 2,404 moves with no price cut behind them went 2 away. One store, one chart, one country — it is the only place we have enough observations to say even that.
Prices outside the United States have been collected since 6 August 2026 and chart positions since 19 July 2026, so a cut older than that has no market to compare and a market that joined later has no history yet. Nothing here is converted between currencies.
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English, French, Italian, German, Spanish - Spain, Arabic, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese - Brazil, Russian, Simplified Chinese +2 more
Hours played at review time, across 915 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
игра ♥♥♥♥♥
以后再也不玩EA相关的游戏，恶心
回味童年的还是别买了，不好玩
垃圾游戏，一直连接服务器，之前买的时候还可以玩呢，仓库吃灰之后现在想打开发现打不开，妥妥骗子公司，
лагает когда бегаешь пк ртх 50090
Este juego, si lo piensas fuera de los míticos Garden Warfare 1 y 2, es muy divertido. Lamentablemente este juego se transformó en el típico título de "potencial desperdiciado", prometieron un GW3 y se pusieron unos zapatos muy grandes que no pudieron llenar... Hoy en día ya no pasan de los 100 o 200 jugadores simultáneos EN EL MUNDO y sus desarrolladores dejaron de actualizarlo incluso antes de que cumpliera su primer año en el mercado. El modo "campaña" es divertido nada más para las primeras dos zonas, después de eso se vuelve muy repetitivo y con 0 sustancia. Pero por otro lado, el juego es disfrutable si lo piensas como algo paralelo a los Garden Warfare, aunque eliminaran las variantes de plantas y zombies, las mejoras que puedes equiparles hacen más interesante el gameplay al tener muchas variedades de combinaciones para ayudar a tu equipo o a sobrevivir más tiempo. Sinceramente, hoy no lo recomiendo, y si tienes muchisimas ganas de jugarlo, solo cuando esté en descuento porque el precio completo de este juego no vale la pena para lo poco que ya ofrece hoy en día.
poooop
El mejor juego sin duda, infravalorado
i dont see why pepole dont like this game i find it so fun yes i agree it is not as good as GW2 but that dosent mean its a bad game?!?
Active players
Estimated daily and monthly active players (DAU/MAU) modeled from peak concurrency.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Players also reviewed
The games this title's players most often review too — audience affinity.