CryoFall

The game is too easy in single player mode. I also dislike that I can’t rotate objects or use a controller in-game either. But hey, it was on sale for $2 so I can’t really complain. At least progression doesn’t take ages to get anywhere.

没有后续更新跟死了没区别

Not fun, dedicated server setup is a hassle as well.

eu tinha feito uma analise desse jogo, até realmente entender o motivo dos servidores estarem com menos de 20 players! o jogo é totalmente desbalanceado, bom players que gostam de grifar e atrapalhar o seu progresso. tenho 162hrs total de jogo e posso falar! Não vale a pena, infelizmente tomei um banho de agua fria ao perceber o motivo do jogo estar abandonado! pvp desbalanceado, cheio de players rac1st4s, sem suporte algum, fui falar com os devs no discord e fizeram pouco caso. Pontos Positivos: mecanica legal Divertido servidores online Ponto negativo pvp desbalanceado Supostamente Hackers (players não leva dano) Ping alto mesmo em servidores da america do sul suporte horrivel 5/10 NÃO RECOMENDO COMPRAR! SÓ NÃO PEÇO REEMBOLSO POIS NÃO ACHO JUSTO!

Cool put no. top down rust. Dead servers w/ 2 week wipe cycles.

It was a really solid game in the beginning. Needs more, WAY more content, best to play if you have friends. Solo game grind is terrible, and the server wipes are a big annoyance. Only buy if it's on sale for 50% or more. Devs don't care about this game anymore.

Its a OK game but heres the few things ive noticed (ONLY BUY IF ITS DIRT CHEAP) 1.building is ok ......BUT having farm plots and land claims unmovable once placed is just poor design since you don't explain the fact you cant build near cliffs 2.very boring playing solo, i was wishful thinking there were NPC tribes but i was wrong 3. Its a better looking Dumbdown RimWorld concept

While PvP survival and base building video games have always been popular, Cryofall attempts an entry into this category by appearing as a niche given that it's designed as a 2.5D world. The problem with this approach is that it takes the notion of "competitive PvP" and eliminates certain factors that make great PvP what it is. You have a complete aerial overview of each cardinal direction and can see any threats nearby or that are approaching your location off-screen. There's less reliance upon mechanical skills like aiming and tracking or outplaying your opponent to win because of how much of the map you can see no matter which direction your character is facing. There's no stealth or patience as you await the perfect opportunity to assault their base or to attack someone when they least expect it. There's no real defensive base building system because they're going to see you or your traps no matter what, making the PvP one-dimensional where it all plays out the same: you observe which one of you has advanced higher in the game's tech tree (where you unlock more advanced technology, weaponry, mechs, etc) and if they're shooting lasers, and you're still using bullets, then you should probably just run or give up your base because there's no point in trying to defend. Other PvP survival games done right, like Rust, can have you winning those duels if you're just a better player. Newbies to the video game are going to be griefed repeatedly until the inevitable server wipe, which is clearly implemented to reset everybody to an equal playing field, except nobody is truly equal here because those who can 'no-life' the video game will already be at higher tiers than you as playing the game for at least 10 hours per day is what is basically required for decent progression. I don't think that the game is bad for what it is, but it was essentially designed to be played on PvP servers, and the priority of PvP makes playing it solo or as a PvE experience boring after a while. Because the game is getting older, and because it was probably never that popular to begin with, you can look at the online server list and, on a Saturday, see maybe a dozen servers with around 50 people spread throughout. Some PvE, some PvP. I can't understand when developers have such an obsession with making their video game PvP-centered that they sacrifice ideas and development time on making PvE fun. While I enjoy PvP, you're alienating a large portion of a playerbase by telling them "this is the optimal way to play our video game" and your video game is already going to lose the interest of many players simply just because it looks like and plays like an RPGMaker game. The reason for playing multiplayer servers and cooperating with random players, or at least hosting your own private server for you and your friends, is because you will quite literally spend 100+ hours just to get to "tier 4" of the technology tree, out of 5 tiers, even with other players helping with the base. There is an excessive grind to this game that necessitates teamwork if you actually want to beat the game or at least unlock the coolest technology items such as the hoverboard and the mech. In fact, it's more ideal to customize the settings of the game so that drop rates and other values are improved by more than double the default values if you can't invest multiple hours per day into this game. This will allow you to obtain more resources for less effort, but if you need to negate the grindiness of a game by resorting to this method, then it's really just proof that the game is a bit too grindy for its own good. And for the development team, there really isn't any downside to making the game less grindy by default. It'd improve the entire game by equalizing PvP servers and making the solo game or PvE more fun. The developers just have to understand that prolonging playtime by forcing players to grind for hours upon hours just to beat their game is a tacky tactic. There's even real-time decay on a lot of items, like food, so a lot of your perishable items and resources are going to expire when you are offline and unable to collect/use them. This is one of those video games that gets equated to a real life job in that it becomes an obligation more than a fun video game to play.