Ranocta

이거할바에 리스테이지 하러감

超級難控制的音樂遊戲，怎麼說呢遊戲分為圓形和鋼琴兩種模式，遊玩方式分為左右兩隻手控制兩個圖案，將圖案移動到指定位置就會自己Combo，遇到方形要自己按方向鍵下，玩法上算是還行，但是鋼琴模式當你按下左右鍵時圖案是慢慢往你案的方向漂過去實在是很難控制，圓形模式下好點，但也會遇到要從一個點慢慢移動到下一個點的節拍，然而你按一次方向鍵就移動一格，不知道怎樣才能跟著動，總之有興趣可以玩玩，知道怎麼玩的話可以教我QQ

현재 총 9곡이 있고 기존 리듬게임처럼 타격하는 방식이 아니고 노트가 떨어지는 위치로 이동해야 하는 방식이라 노트가 너무 햇갈리지만 유저가 익숙해져야 하는 부분인 듯 하고 새로운 방식의 리듬게임을 찾던 유저에게는 무료로 플레이 할 수 있기에 추천할만 해요

good game

really good idea but the hand eye coordination on this is insane really struggled on this. I ve been playing rhythm games passionately for 4+ years and ive never had such a hard time learning a game but other wise its really good if you can get past the learning curve

Инди-платформер с элементами головоломки, где игроки исследуют мистический лес и решают загадки древних существ. Плюсы: Уникальная атмосфера — погружение в волшебный и таинственный мир; Интересные головоломки — разнообразные задачи для разгадки тайн; Интуитивное управление — легко освоить базовые механики. Минусы: Ограниченное количество уровней — игра может быть пройдена быстро; Однотипные враги — враги могут повторяться; Некоторые баги — возможны технические недочёты. Итог: понравится любителям атмосферных платформеров и головоломок. Захватывающий мир и интересные загадки делают игру увлекательной, несмотря на возможные технические недочёты и ограниченное количество уровней.

"Ranocta" is a very poorly made rhythm/QTE game... think about Guitar Hero but remove all the music, the battle of the bands theme, the interesting gameplay and mechanics, and replace none of it, leaving a shallow shell of a game with the bare mechanic and some terrible "music". It's easy to see why this failed on Steam Direct. This is barely any different from a browser game from the late 1990's, yet has been dumped on Steam Direct as if it's a modern PC game. This just isn't up to the quality standards expected from contemporary PC gamers. If I wanted to play "games" like this, I'd be searching for free browser games in Firefox, not looking for Flash tier games on Steam. This feels more like a tech demo or a project smacked together hurriedly to try make a kind of minimum viable product just good enough to pass the developers unambitious idea and shove it into Steam Direct to see if you can actually pay $100 and publish junk through Steam Direct. Yeah, you can. Is this good for gamers? Nope. The graphics here are particularly awful, the graphics are so bad it looks like someone had a stroke while trying to do an abstract oil painting, so bad that it actually stands out as one of the worst looking games on Steam. Quite an accomplishment. It's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost. Gaming is a primarily visual medium, and if developers want to succeed, they must understand that it's not an area for compromise. Now onto pricing and value. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. A peak of [b]6 concurrent players[/b] (according to SteamDB) for a "free" game is a disastrous public reception. Out of 130 million potential players here on Steam, almost nobody was interested. Even though this is "free". That level of rejection speaks a lot for the quality of the game. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? What's the verdict? This is a hard pass. There's no immediate financial commitment, but there are thousands of more compelling games on the platform that will give you a lot more enjoyment for your time.