
A chilled out & stimulating nonogram puzzle game with endless logic puzzles to solve. Uncover a huge variety of 3D objects, and discover new puzzles - never run out of fun!
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media

About
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English
Engagement
Hours played at review time, across 40 reviews with recorded playtime.
Reviews
Themes across 40 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Reviews
This isn't inherently a bad game... the curated puzzles are fun, but the levels don't take very long to complete in their entirety. That means, to continue to play, you have to do the endless levels. These are buggy and are outrageously easier than the curated levels. More often than not, the puzzle doesn't resemble the image at all; that is, if the level even loads. This could be a really fun puzzle game if improvements were made. I 100%ed the game in under 6 hours, and that was with a lot of dillydallying.
This game is completely broken. Only two levels work, and the rest is unplayable. Steam shouldn't allow games in this state to be sold.
Edit: Updated review, the game is working now and is fun to play :)
Picture Everything: Puzzle Cross Galaxy is a logic-focused puzzle title developed and published by Spilt Milk Studios Ltd that attempts to reimagine the traditional nonogram formula through procedural generation and creative freedom. At its foundation, the game is built around classic picture-cross mechanics, where players use numerical clues to fill in grid cells and gradually reveal hidden images. What distinguishes it from more conventional nonogram collections is its ambition to offer near-endless content by generating puzzles dynamically from a large, cloud-based library of 3D assets rather than relying solely on hand-crafted levels. The core gameplay will feel instantly familiar to fans of nonograms or Picross-style puzzles. Each puzzle presents a grid, typically up to 15×15 in size, with numbers lining the rows and columns that indicate how many contiguous cells should be filled. Through careful deduction, pattern recognition, and elimination, players gradually uncover the correct configuration. The rules are simple, intuitive, and well explained, making the game accessible even to newcomers to the genre. Solving a puzzle culminates in the reveal of a corresponding 3D object, which can then be viewed in a collection gallery, giving a small but satisfying sense of tangible progress beyond simply clearing a grid. The game begins with a modest set of curated puzzles designed to ease players into its systems. These introductory challenges are more deliberately structured and tend to offer clearer logic paths, showcasing the strengths of traditional nonogram design. Once past this initial content, the experience opens up into its defining feature: the ability to generate puzzles on demand. Players can input keywords or concepts, prompting the game to pull from its online asset library and convert a matching 3D object into a puzzle. In theory, this system allows for an almost limitless supply of challenges, encouraging curiosity and experimentation as players try increasingly abstract or unexpected search terms. This procedural approach is both the game’s most interesting idea and its most divisive element. When the generation works well, it can feel genuinely novel to solve a puzzle tied to a concept you personally chose, creating a sense of ownership over the challenge. It transforms puzzle-solving into a kind of exploration, where discovery is driven by imagination as much as logic. However, because these puzzles are generated rather than carefully designed, their quality can vary significantly. Some puzzles offer satisfying logical progression, while others feel awkwardly shaped, visually unclear, or less engaging to solve, which can undermine the consistency that many puzzle fans value. Presentation-wise, Picture Everything: Puzzle Cross Galaxy opts for a clean and minimalist interface. The grids are easy to read, clues are clearly displayed, and interactions are straightforward, allowing players to focus entirely on deduction rather than wrestling with the UI. The visual style is functional rather than expressive, and while it lacks strong personality or thematic flair, it suits the relaxed, low-pressure nature of the gameplay. The revealed 3D models add a small visual reward, though they are more of a curiosity than a central draw, serving primarily as confirmation that the puzzle has been completed correctly. One important consideration is the game’s reliance on an internet connection. Because the majority of its puzzle content is generated through an online system, players must remain connected to access its full feature set. This design choice enables the expansive scope of the puzzle library, but it also introduces dependency on external services and limits offline play. For players accustomed to self-contained puzzle games that can be enjoyed anywhere, this requirement may feel restrictive and runs counter to the traditionally offline-friendly nature of logic puzzles. Over longer sessions, the experience can begin to feel repetitive despite its theoretical endlessness. The mechanics themselves do not evolve, and without carefully tuned difficulty curves or handcrafted puzzle pacing, the sense of progression relies almost entirely on personal motivation. For some players, the freedom to generate infinite puzzles is enough to sustain interest; for others, the lack of consistent design polish can cause the novelty to fade. Achievements and time-based challenges offer minor incentives, but they do not significantly change the underlying loop. Ultimately, Picture Everything: Puzzle Cross Galaxy is an experimental take on a well-established puzzle genre. Its ambition to combine nonogram logic with procedural, user-driven content is commendable and occasionally inspiring, offering moments where creativity and deduction align in satisfying ways. At the same time, the uneven quality of generated puzzles and dependence on online infrastructure prevent it from fully replacing more traditional, carefully curated nonogram experiences. For players who enjoy relaxed logic puzzles and are intrigued by the idea of infinite, concept-driven challenges, it offers an interesting sandbox to explore. For those seeking consistently polished puzzle design with a strong sense of crafted progression, its appeal may be more limited, making it a curious but imperfect addition to the genre. Rating: 5/10
The game seems basically dead. Half of the puzzles are not doable (they don't even charge), and the other half is extremely simple (like a filled square or a simple line). I'm really disapointted as a big nonogram enjoyer, it's the first time I see something like this.
The concept, generating picross puzzles by request, is a pretty neat idea, but this game falls short in a lot of ways. The map is marked in such a light color that I have to strain my eyes to see which squares I've filled in (I'm colorblind so that could just be me). Clicking and dragging to fill in the map will also remove any filled squares you move over, which paired with the previous issue means I've spent more time making sure the right squares stay filled in than actually trying to solve the puzzle. There don't seem to be any safeguards against making puzzles that can't be solved purely with logic, I've already run into cases where I was left with a coinflip. On top of all that, the game crashes mid puzzle (fortunately that was pretty rare). With a bit more work, this could be a neat addition to the assortment of nonogram options on here, but as is I can't recommend it.
Moooooo
很糟糕 操作是常见的左键填色 右键打叉 但是滑动填涂时经过已填色的会被取消 打叉也是会取消 并且相互间也干扰 操作很难受 画布并没其他同类游戏采用的棋盘分色 5x5分区粗线等 大图经常要数格子 而且白花花的容易视疲劳 模型与数织图形不能说出入很大 只能说是毫无关联 主打一个不知所云 要命的是会生成不唯一解 像是3x3范围内 横竖都是111 只能靠排列租合来猜 另外模型及名称要预先加载好才能开始 完全没有完成的惊喜 模型库来自古狗 需要联网获取 有时候很慢 甚至加载不出来 完全没有音乐 音效也很难听 还有行列完成标记错位 甚至实际完成分段和完成标记不对应 分辨率选项一大堆 但同样的画布周围巨量空白 就用了中间一小块 数字字体又小又丑 很费眼睛
it's okay, not great, it crashes a decent amount, especially after doing a lot of puzzles in a row. the highlighting method is VERY touchy. it's a bit basic but the premise to do puzzles based off of unity objects is cool
Не без багов, но сойдет
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time, reconstructed from Steam's monthly review histogram.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| Hidden Capybaras with Orange | $4.8K | 173 | 99% | $1.99 |
| Leximan | $4.8K | 69 | 86% | $4.49 |
| The Adventures of Mr. Bobley | $4.8K | 142 | 73% | $1.99 |
| 8infinity | $4.8K | 432 | 71% | $0.99 |
| Incremental Dice | $4.8K | 66 | 56% | $4.99 |
| Lastbane | $4.8K | 53 | 26% | $3.99 |
Related
| Candy Crush Saga | $2.3B | 38.9M | 93% | Free |
| My Talking Tom | $1.3B | 17.4M | 86% | Free |
| My Talking Tom 2: Pet Game | $1.1B | 6.7M | 86% | Free |
| My Talking Angela | $1.1B | 14M | 83% | Free |
| My Talking Tom Friends | $824.4M | 4.1M | 86% | Free |
| Talking Tom Cat | $647.3M | 2.9M | 81% | Free |