Kwyjibo Adventure

Simple, cute and short 3D card roguelike. Not perfect, but you can spend 10-15 minutes having fun - that's how much time you need to finish the game if you won't play "endless mode"

Oyunda sihirli bir yoyo kullanarak zorbalara karşı savaştığınız 3 boyutlu sıra tabanlı bir dövüş oyunudur. Okuldaki yeni bir çocuk olan Emily olarak oynayın ve yoyo ile harika numaralar yaparak ve mistik büyüler yaparak kendinizi savunun.

"Kwyjibo Adventure" is a weird one. It's also an objective failure for reasons we'll get into later. The game's story centers on Emily, a new student facing school bullies. She discovers a magic yo-yo and uses it to confront them. The game portrays a transformation from a timid student to a confident protagonist, emphasizing inner strength. What do you do in the game? You engage in strategic turn-based combat using a magic yo-yo, fighting with a lightweight RPG/health system to damage your opponents. You perform yo-yo tricks to cast spells, using a console peasant children's toy because I guess the developer doesn't own a keyboard and mouse, or thinks we're all console peasants and PC is just a kind of console, right? Ugh. The graphics aren't great, a blend of really badly drawn MS-Paint comics and some low quality low poly assets... I mean, this isn't pixelcrap or an asset flip, but it's not winning any awards. That's understandably a turn off for a lot of gamers, and it's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost. Gaming is a primarily visual medium, and if developers want to succeed, they must understand that it's not an area for compromise. You deserve better than compromises. Insultingly, the developer insists that you should play this with a console peasant children's toy gamepad instead of KB+M. You cannot play this without a console peasant children's toy. Developers should try to be aware which platform they're designing games for. It's the responsibility of the developer to ensure the game runs well on the platform they're selling it on, with the primary peripherals that PC gamers use. The developer chose not to do the job of a real game developer and create meaningful bespoke levels, narrative based gameplay progression and so on. Instead, they decided that "Procgen IS content!" and lazily tried to use procgen algorithms to create infinite, samey, repetitive, soulless levels, because that's a lot less work. As a result of this poor decision, the game gets tired and repetitive almost immediately. Developers must learn that procgen is a terrible substitute for creating real content. It should not be used as "ez-mode" for content creation, as the developer tried to do here. On the matter of pricing and value for gamers, most "free" games on Steam aren't really free. There's often nasty mobile app cash shops, or content locked behind DLC, or donations being requested, or any other number of shady pricing schemes that could mislead gamers, but in this case I'm glad to say this really does appear to be a fully free game. Nothing demonstrates a developers belief in themselves and their work than giving it away without any remuneration. This is a service to themselves, and the gaming industry, and should be applauded. Of course, just because something is free, doesn't necessarily mean it's valuable, or something you might want to spend your time on. Despite having no up-front cost, this failed to appeal to the 120 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at only 2 concurrent players... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough.