
Invisibox is a tough puzzle game where you have to solve sliding puzzles by controlling invisible boxes while avoiding various obstacles.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Media

About
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 40 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
The box vanishes like a stage magician each level is a new trick and I’m still looking for the catch.
还行
Invisibox, developed and published by Retrific, is a puzzle game built around a deceptively simple but genuinely inventive idea: navigating objects you cannot see. While it borrows the basic structure of grid-based puzzle games, it strips away visual certainty and replaces it with reliance on memory and spatial awareness. This single design choice transforms what would otherwise be a familiar experience into something far more mentally demanding, asking players to think ahead, track movement internally, and trust their own understanding of the level rather than what is directly visible. The core objective is straightforward—guide invisible boxes to their designated positions while avoiding obstacles—but the execution makes even the simplest tasks feel intricate. Each move requires careful consideration, as you must mentally reconstruct the positions of objects after every action. The absence of visual feedback forces you to build a mental map of the level, turning progression into a process of deduction and recall. Early levels introduce this concept gently, allowing players to become comfortable with the idea of “seeing without seeing,” but the difficulty escalates steadily as more elements are layered into the environment. As the game progresses, additional hazards and mechanics are introduced to complicate the puzzle space. Obstacles require precise positioning, and the margin for error becomes increasingly narrow. What begins as a manageable exercise in memory evolves into a demanding challenge that tests both planning and adaptability. The design remains consistent throughout, focusing on expanding the complexity of situations rather than introducing entirely new systems. This approach keeps the experience cohesive, though it can also make later stages feel like intensified versions of earlier ones rather than entirely new challenges. One of the more thoughtful aspects of Invisibox is its inclusion of a system that allows players to briefly reveal the invisible elements. This feature acts as a safety net, helping players recalibrate their understanding of the level when things become too confusing. It doesn’t remove the challenge, but it provides a way to recover from mistakes without restarting entirely. This balance between difficulty and accessibility makes the game more approachable, especially for those who may find the core concept overwhelming at first. The presentation is intentionally minimal, supporting the gameplay rather than competing with it. Clean, uncluttered environments ensure that players can focus entirely on the puzzle mechanics, and the lack of visual distraction reinforces the central idea of relying on internal visualization. The audio design is similarly restrained, offering subtle cues that complement the experience without drawing attention away from the task at hand. This simplicity works in the game’s favor, creating a focused and immersive atmosphere. However, the same minimalism that defines the game also limits its scope. The core mechanic, while clever, does not evolve significantly beyond its initial premise. The challenge comes from increasingly complex arrangements rather than new ideas, which can lead to a sense of repetition over time. Additionally, the reliance on memory and trial-and-error may not appeal to all players, particularly those who prefer more visually intuitive or logic-based puzzles. Once the novelty of the concept wears off, the experience can feel somewhat one-dimensional. Replay value is also limited. While the game includes a rating system that encourages efficient solutions, the primary satisfaction comes from solving each puzzle for the first time. Once completed, there is little incentive to revisit levels unless you are aiming for perfection or simply enjoy refining your approach. In the end, Invisibox stands out as a creative and focused puzzle experience that builds entirely around a single, well-executed idea. It challenges players to think differently, relying on memory and spatial reasoning in a way that few games attempt. While its scope is modest and its appeal somewhat niche, it delivers a unique and engaging experience for those willing to embrace its unconventional approach. Rating: 7/10
Related
Related
Trends
Modeled estimate over time, reconstructed from Steam's monthly review histogram.
Hours played at review time, across 40 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
🧠 《Invisibox》简评: 这款游戏是一款由 Retrific 开发的解谜游戏,玩家需要控制不可见的方块,解决滑动谜题,避开各种障碍。 优点: 创新玩法:控制不可见的方块进行解谜,提供了独特的游戏体验。 关卡丰富:游戏包含近 100 个手工制作的关卡,挑战性逐步提升。 辅助功能:提供“Visibox”模式,使方块可见,降低游戏难度,适合不同水平的玩家。 缺点: 视觉引导不足:由于方块不可见,部分玩家可能在游戏过程中感到迷失方向。 界面简陋:游戏界面设计较为基础,缺乏美观性。 重复性高:部分关卡设计相似,可能导致玩家感到乏味。 总体而言,《Invisibox》是一款具有创新玩法的解谜游戏,适合喜欢挑战记忆和空间感知能力的玩家。然而,其在视觉引导和界面设计方面还有提升空间。 ⭐⭐⭐(3/5)
非常无聊的喜加一
jogo de puzzle bem simples
本质是为了星星背景游玩的 游戏是极简风格 每个关卡都设计的很巧妙 总的来说还是推荐入手的
☀️
Invisibox 10/10
《Invisibox》这款游戏在发布时,其独特的谜题设计和概念引起了部分玩家的兴趣。然而在我实际体验后,却发现这款游戏并未能达到我的预期,存在诸多令人失望的问题。 首先游戏的谜题设计显得单调且缺乏深度。虽然游戏主打的是解谜元素,但谜题的设计却过于简单,缺乏足够的挑战性和趣味性。许多谜题的解决方式过于直接,缺乏让人深思的复杂性和多样性,使得玩家在游玩过程中很容易感到厌倦。 其次游戏的剧情和故事背景也相当薄弱。游戏试图通过一系列谜题和关卡来构建一个神秘的世界,但故事情节的发展却显得平淡无奇,缺乏足够的吸引力。角色之间的关系和互动也缺乏深度和细节,使得玩家难以真正投入其中。 在画面和音效方面的表现同样不尽如人意。游戏的画面质量较为粗糙,场景和角色的设计缺乏细节和精致度,使得游戏世界显得不够真实和引人入胜。音效设计也显得单调乏味,背景音乐和音效效果都未能为游戏营造出恰当的氛围和情感。 此外游戏的操作体验也令人感到不适。游戏界面的设计不够人性化,按钮布局和交互方式不够直观,导致玩家在操作过程中经常感到困惑和不便。尤其是在解谜的过程中,这种操作上的不便更是加剧了游戏体验的下降。 最后游戏的定价和性价比也让人难以接受。考虑到游戏在谜题设计、剧情、画面、音效以及操作体验等方面的问题,其售价显然偏高,与游戏品质并不相符。 综上所述,在谜题设计、剧情、画面、音效、操作体验和性价比等方面都存在令人失望的问题。如果你对解谜类游戏抱有期待,我建议你寻找其他更加出色且性价比更高的作品来满足你的需求。
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| Endless Fireworks Simulator | $2.8K | 53 | 85% | $1.99 |
| CYBER EMOJI TALE 2099 | $2.8K | 111 | 88% | $0.99 |
| RetroDrift: Retrowave Online Road | $2.8K | 76 | 80% | $0.99 |
| 69 Ways to Kill a Zombie | $2.8K | 141 | 62% | $0.69 |
| The Wisbey Mystery | $2.8K | 115 | 65% | $1.59 |
| Highland Warriors | $2.8K | 88 | 67% | $1.19 |