Intelligent Design: An Evolutionary Sandbox

As the title suggests, "Intelligent Design: An Evolutionary Sandbox" is a sandbox game in which the player tries to create a stable ecosystem consisting of plants, herbivores and carnivores. By collecting biomass it is possible to buy a research building that allows to adjust given genes. So the player may create and save different species... that may survive, die immediately or crash your whole ecosystem. The graphics and audio are... compared to other games... nearly not worth mentioning, but all in all it suits well to the style of the game. For example the plants are displayed as cylinders of different size, color etc. To mention an other disadvantage of the game you can create a few different ecosystems, but after 10-15 hours it is possible that you have experienced most of the content and the game could become boring easily. Lets come to the advantages: If you love searching for the right composition of genes using different regulators you may have a lot of fun, because you are able to witness your own creations. Will the carnivores wipe out all of your herbivores or does the population stay stable? It is also possible to reach most of the steam achievements by playing which it is quite fun. I can summarize that "Intelligent Design: An Evolutionary Sandbox" is [b]worth the prize[/b]. If you do like to tinker at your own species, and enjoy the results for 5-15 hours gameplay, you should buy it :).

Intelligent Design: An Evolutionary Sandbox is an interesting concept (although the controversial title is a poor choice). It's a thematic ripoff of games like SimEarth, and while more recent, it does come across as a bit shallow compared to that older title. The idea is that you create and maintain an ecosystem of plants and animals... a sandbox experience. There's a few goals and achievements to hunt for but otherwise it's just wrestling with the UI and being disappointed by the technical implementation, which, unfortunately, is far too weak to permit this to find the success it may have had if it had higher production value. From a technical perspective, the game doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard. We can say with great certainty that this game is not an asset flip. This is because the assets are of such poor quality that no self respecting asset creator or artist would publish them under any circumstances. Certainly, nobody likes to see asset recycling, stock assets are intended to be used as placeholders until superior assets can be created by the developer, but when we get what's worse than either stock assets being flipped or professional assets, it's a reason for gamers to go out of their way to avoid the product. The game features lazy low-polygon "retro" assets, making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the 1990s. It's unclear why the developers weren't able to arrange high quality, high polygon count contemporary assets for the game, and also irrelevant... what matters is that this looks bad as a result of their decisions, a compromise PC gamers shouldn't have to put up with. The controls can't be customised, which will be an annoyance for many, but it can also render the game unplayable for differently-abled gamers, left handed gamers or gamers using AZERTY or other international keyboard layouts. The game features no proper level design or game/story flow/plot, and while some game formats can be ameniable to this, they must be truly exceptional, where this is not. The developers of this game made the deliberate, arguably lazy choice to avoid doing the most important component of game development, content creation, and instead made this an empty "sandbox" game with few if any goals or point to playing. These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game. Intelligent Design: An Evolutionary Sandbox didn't appeal much to the people who own a copy of the game, either. It has achievements, and they show us a very clear picture that the game didn't really capture any interest from gamers. The most commonly and easily attained achievement is "Balance ", is for creating an environment with more plants than animals and more carnivores than herbivores for a day, trivial to get, but less than 22 percent of players bothered to get that far before uninstalling the game. Hardly a success story, even the people who own this game weren't interested in it. So, should you buy this game? Is this one of the best of the 110,000+ games on Steam? Intelligent Design: An Evolutionary Sandbox has the comically over-optimistic price of around $7 USD, it's not worth it given the defects and shortcomings with the product, especially considering the sheer number of completely free, much higher quality games on Steam. This is also competing with over 14,000 free games available on Steam, many of them far better than this paid product.

There's a game here somewhere? Not worth playing at all, save yourself some time and money and just move on to the next thing on the store

The game has a great concept but it's executed in a way that presents itself as bland and confusing. The game could've had way better UI design and just better general concept integration. I can't recommend this game unless you're [i]really[/i] curious about the idea of observing evolution

this is a very good game if your in the evolutionary type games -THIS IS NOT A QUICK GAME DON'T EXPECT STUFF TO HAPPEN FAST- (one problem, the link in the game to the discord server does not work)

It's always an interesting idea, to me, to see simulations of genetics and evolution. However, Intelligent Design doesn't really do a great job of showing those systems off through their sandbox. There's very little to do in the game, little to no explanation of the different attributes at play in the game's systems, and I'm not even sure what sort of generational genetics are involved in the simulation, because there's little visual about the genetics system's attributes, no easy way to check on attribute values/ranges of individuals/groups, and no way at all to track that information across generations, other than remembering, "I think these guys used to be slower on average, so I guess the pressures selected for higher speed?" You're really not missing much of anything by skipping out on this one.

Цэ е пыздец.

It has interesting game mechanics and you can run multiple mini game like areas using the towers. Very fun and interesting evolution simulation game !

More what could had been then what it is, this is a early prototype game at best. You cant do much visualy wise its even more empty. The most basic eco simulation possible with nearly zero input from you or any waypointing..