Insurgency: Sandstorm

com certeza eu não deveria ter gastado dinheiro nisso

This is an arcade shooter wearing a Tactical Mil-Sim Body Kit Do not let the marketing or the forum hype fool you. This is not a hardcore tactical simulator. It is a mathematically rigged arcade shooter that relies on cheap engine exploits and artificial difficulty to punish actual military doctrine. If you apply real-world CQB tactics, slicing the pie, and disciplined positioning, the game’s engine will actively cheat to kill you. Here is what is actually running under the hood: 1. Mathematically Rigged AI (Aimbots, Not Tactics) The bots do not use organic target acquisition. The engine runs a flat raycast to your player's hitbox (head or spine) the millisecond a single pixel is exposed. The AI suffers zero human reaction latency, zero weapon inertia, and zero suppression flinch. They will execute a zero-millisecond snap-aim and one-tap you with a bolt-action Mosin while mid-sprint, vaulting, or while their physical weapon model could be sometimes pointed at the floor. 2. Broken Ballistics & Irrelevant Armor Physics The damage model completely ignores kinetic energy transfer and real-world armor physics. Level IV heavy ceramic plates, designed to shatter and stop armor-piercing rifle rounds, are routinely bypassed by 12-gauge shotgun shells/slugs for one-hit center-mass kills, same with the Mosin Nagant 1895 bolt action rifle that's chambered in 7,62 mm x 54mmr. Conversely, the AI will use x-ray tracking to laser-beam you with a DShK through multiple layers of solid concrete and industrial pipes with zero calculation for velocity drop-off. 3. Z-Axis Geometry & Explosive Failures The game uses lazy spherical damage checks for explosives. Because the engine fails to properly calculate vertical raycast blocking (and relies on mismatched top/bottom textures like wood vs. concrete), enemy suicide bombers and mortars will routinely kill you through solid ceilings, thick floors, and heavy stairwells. 4. "Swiss Cheese" Map Design Real urban strongholds have limited entry points to control fatal funnels. In this game, the developers intentionally built every room with 3 to 4 or even more doorways/entries and massive low-sill windows. It is mathematically impossible for a solo player or small squad to maintain 360-degree security. This isn't done for realism; it is done so the AI director can legally spawn a suicide bomber in your blind spot to wipe your team after a capture. Addressing Common Defenses of the Engine: Many players have developed workarounds for these coding flaws and confuse them with actual mechanics. However, these do not excuse the broken engine: The "Pacing" Argument: Moving slower and playing methodically does not fix an engine that allows AI to track hitboxes through solid geometry and client-side smoke. You cannot out-tactic a scripted wall-hack. The "Teamwork" Argument: Relying on squad mates for cover is standard military doctrine, but it does not stop an explosive from magically punching through a solid concrete floor due to vertical occlusion failures in the map geometry. The "Crouch" Workaround: If standing weapon sway is so artificially inflated that the only viable offensive tactic is to permanently crab-walk around corners to abuse a stabilization mechanic, that is a failure of the ballistic model, not a feature of a tactical simulator. Even the Lead Game Designer has publicly admitted on Reddit that the smoke rendering is flawed and the weapon sway needs overhauling. There is zero need in defending the lazy coding that the developers themselves have apologized for. You can spend hundreds of hours building muscle memory to bypass this game's broken engine exploits. But do not confuse adapting to bad code with experiencing a realistic tactical simulator. Verdict: Not Recommended.