毛蟹穴

题材和美术风格都相当不错 图几个改进意见 1 人物移动还是不建议用鼠标控制，和交互键很容易发生冲突，完全可以保留wasd移动和e键交互 2 解谜最好给出一定的教程，煎药我完全是自己摸索的，新手游玩很不友好 3 可以把当前主线任务做个UI放在界面上，不然有时真的不知道该干嘛 4 抓鸡以后有bug，无法触发后续剧情 祝越做越好，加油！

画面真的很好看，很有创意的。但是也没个新手指引，玩起来有点吃力。煎药和抓鸡那里都没有小游戏的说明，完全靠自己摸索。另外，我完全不知道怎么打开背包（或者根本不需要打开背包）把药给老夫人，或者把鸡塞回笼子，尝试用鼠标点击或者键盘都完全不行，我不明白是否是我自己的原因。

毛蟹穴 is one of literally thousands of student projects infesting Steam. It's from somewhere in Taiwan. While student projects tend to be better quality than most "amateur" made games, we must still question what value such projects have for gamers. As with all student projects, this isn't really a fully fleshed out game, it's just the result of an academic exercise, and as such it has much more limited value as a game than a professionally developed game would have. Educational institutions should not be using Steam as a dumping ground for homework assignments (especially if the students didn't even pass the course). Sure, it helps their marketing and helps the students feel good about themselves, but this is another case of a business putting themselves before the needs of gamers. This is a simple 2D "shadow puppet" themed puzzle game based on historical events in Taiwan. Apparently they were into a bit of human sacrifice in the 1800's back then. The more you know. It's a bit of minigaming and puzzles and some dialogue... it's a short and shallow experience, and if I paid money to go to University to learn game development in Taiwan, I'd be demanding my money back if they told me they were going to teach me how to make 2D "Flash" games like this. 3D gaming became mainstream in the 1990s. There's no English translation for the game, but that's okay. The language of bad games is universal. The game features really lacklustre 2D visuals (does the developer not know 3D graphics became mainstream in the mid-1990s?). Gamers don't spend thousands of dollars on gaming rigs and the latest 3D graphics cards to play 2D games. Even mobile phones and game consoles can do 3D graphics now. There's no excuse. On the matter of pricing and value for gamers, most "free" games on Steam aren't really free. There's often nasty mobile app cash shops, or content locked behind DLC, or donations being requested, or any other number of shady pricing schemes that could mislead gamers, but in this case I'm glad to say this really does appear to be a fully free game. Nothing demonstrates a developers belief in themselves and their work than giving it away without any remuneration. This is a service to themselves, and the gaming industry, and should be applauded. Of course, just because something is free, doesn't necessarily mean it's valuable, or something you might want to spend your time on. Despite having no up-front cost, this failed to appeal to the 120 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at only 9 concurrent players... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Not this time. This isn't worth downloading. While this won't cost you any money, you get what you pay for, and sometimes, even when the game is free, it's still not enough.