Gambonanza

Perfect if you like chess and hades

increible

No es mal juego, pero no era lo que esperaba, me gusto el concepto aunque es muy directa la copia a Balatro, aún se siente en etapa de desarrollo, hay pocos gambitos, la mayoria no son muy utiles y generalmente hay algunas cosas aplicadas como la probabilidad de que se active algun gambito o elegir entre 3 piezas que no tiene mucho sentido agregarlo ya que las piezas de ajedrez no varian mucho y siempre es lo mismo.

真的有点难

Gambonanza is comparable to Balatro: instead of playing Cards with Jokers, you play Chess with Gambits. A Gambit e.g. gives a type of your pieces additional abilities, additional income or influence the black and white squares on the board, etc. You start with three pieces (it is limited) on a small board. Each round consists of five matches and at the end you meet a boss with special abilities. Defeating the boss enlarges the Chess board. After every match you get money so you can buy Gambits, pieces or special squares like a protection square (all shop items can be locked) – or you can increase your limit of pieces, what is quite expensive. Buying additional pieces above the limit will put those on reserve, but you can exchange those before and during a match. Is start with my [u]conclusion[/u], before I mention some weaknesses of the game and end with a small starting guide. So, all in all, it is solid game, when you're into Chess. The Balatro-like system works pretty solid and feels pretty challenging. Therefore: [b]recommended[/b] [u]Major weaknesses:[/u] [list] [*]Increasing your piece limit is a) expensive and b) even more expensive for all the following limits. So this is an uphill battle because the computer has constantly more chess pieces than you. [*]So good luck with Knights (which feel completely wasted on the smaller boards due to limited moving space), Knights and Pawns only! [*]There are tons of Gambits and most of them feel completely useless, some feel completely overpowered. [*]This is because the game is very high on the RNG-side: 1) you roll your starting pieces (!), 2) the Gambits in the shop should match your pieces. Too often this is simply not the case [*]The animations are not skippable. So starting a new round takes comparatively long (e.g. for re-rolling your starting pieces, see below). [*]Some bosses will blow away all strategy, because they'll influence your pieces – this is manageable at early stage but critical when you meet such a boss in later rounds. [/list] [u]Small starting guide[/u] (no claim to universal validity): [olist] [*]Start with at least a Rook, better a Queen. [*]Lock interesting Gambits or Pieces in the shop. [*]Read and understand (!) the function of the Gambits, to prevent disappointment. [*]Don't buy anything until you meet (or beat) the first boss. [*]You earn money for interests, so hoarding your money allows more income [*]Winning the first matches should leave you with north of 45 $ [*]Try to get gambits which possibly provide new pieces (sounds easy, huh?) or try to get squares that provide phantom pieces. [*]The computer blunders often. This is necessary, because a match has move limitations. [*]Avoid blundering! [/olist]

진짜 재미있다. 비숍 난이도까지는. 하다보면 좀 불쾌한 억까들도 당하는데, 그래도 좋은 갬빗 뽑아서 사기치면 괜찮음. 나름 도파민 잘 돌게 만들었음 근데 퀸 난이도는 무슨 생각으로 만들었는지 알 수가 없다. 타일도 못써, 갬빗도 못써, 기물도 계속 못써 그러면 이 게임에 남는게 뭐임? 이거 덱빌딩 게임 아니었나? 난이도를 어렵게 하는 게 아니라, 게임의 본질 재미를 해치는 불쾌한 제약들만 가득 넣어놨음. 재밌게 하다가 팍 식어버렸다. 가볍게 즐길거면 비숍난이도까지만.

Що ж, я дав грі шанс. Я люблю шахи, покер і балатро ця гра залупа

rekomen banget buat rougelike enjoyer

Chesslatro

it's basically balatro but chess 7/10