
A competitive board game where players vote to shape their destiny. Transform caravans into 5-star hotels, collect wonders, and earn bounties for bankrupting opponents. Use airports to outmaneuver rivals, organize World Cups to multiply your rent. Can you turn your empire into a global monopoly?
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
About




Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 43 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
开发商自己玩过这游戏吗??开局一米米钱,走两步就被过路费掏光了! 地图又小的一笔,可玩性差,而且没了现金根本没可能翻盘。 什么时候能出个不辣鸡的大富翁游戏???
Super beau jeu qui est compétitif avec du elo, tout en étant fun avec des règles originales. Parfait aussi pour jouer en coop. Il est plein de potentiel, je recommande vivement
La base del juego cumple su cometido, he jugado con mi amigo desde la Legion Go 1 y parece que no es muy amigable para PC Handheld y para mandos porque es un poco lioso, el botón es demasiado ambiguo al tirar los dados y es un poco costoso desplazar solo para comprar propiedades/mejorar. Le falta mucho mejorar la calidad de los controles de mando (Este juego va genial para PC Handheld).
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Languages: English, French, Simplified Chinese, Russian, Polish, Portuguese - Brazil, Czech, Turkish, Spanish - Spain, German, Swedish, Japanese +1 more
Hours played at review time, across 43 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
目前作为一款小游戏是不合格的,因为地图太小,以至于几乎先手必赢,就跟五子棋一样,有先手必赢的公式。玩家一旦排在后面就大概率劣势然后退出游戏。 这里建议作者借鉴一下其他同行的作品,比如‘RichMan 10’,'richman 7',这两款游戏在中国曾经非常火热,尤其是‘richman 7’,它的股票系统,更大的地图以及道具系统都增加了博弈空间,削弱了先后手的差距。我建议作者买一份‘richman 7',自己体验并学习一下前辈的经验。 目前游戏我看是以小体量休闲游戏的方向来开发的,我个人不建议这样,因为大富翁类的游戏,你搞成快节奏,落后的玩家很容易因为无法翻盘而直接退出游戏。简单来说,就是变数太少。我推荐的这两款游戏的变数非常多,以至于我即使是最后一名也会去赌自己能翻盘,并因此玩到最后。 目前游戏的机制太不完善,回购机制太强大了,虽然这个游戏因为小地图的原因只能靠回购机制来博弈,但不建议这样做,因为回购机制明显增大了先后手的差距。其次是南极的惩罚太低了,至少罚款总现金或者总资产的10%,而不是只罚10K。还有地产种类太少,关于地产的特殊效果太少,这些不多说了,只能希望作者能去同行那取经了。 It is currently substandard as a mini-game because the map is so small that a first move is almost guaranteed to win, much like backgammon with a first move formula. Once a player is behind the line the odds are that he or she will be at a disadvantage and then quit the game. It is recommended that the author borrows from the works of other peers, such as 'RichMan 10' and 'richman 7', which were very popular in China, especially 'richman 7', with its stock system, larger map, and props system, all of which add to the gameplay. Especially 'richman 7', its stock system, larger maps and props system have increased the gaming space and weakened the gap between the first and second hand. I suggest the author to buy a copy of 'richman 7' and experience it for himself and learn from the experience of his predecessors. Currently the game looks to me like it is being developed in the direction of a small-bodied casual game, which I personally don't recommend because with a Monopoly-type game, you make it fast-paced, and lagging players can easily just quit the game because they can't turn the tables. Simply put, there are too few variables. The two games I'm recommending have so many variables that I'd bet on myself to flip even if I was in last place and play to the end because of it. The mechanics of the current game are too poor, the buyback mechanic is too powerful, and while this game can only be gamed by the buyback mechanic because of the small map, it is not recommended because the buyback mechanic clearly increases the gap between the first and second place finishers. Secondly, the punishment of Antarctica is too low, at least 10% of the total cash or total assets instead of only 10K. there are also too few types of real estate, too few special effects about real estate, these are not much to say, I can only hope that the author can go to the peer to get experience.
It's basically Monopoly, but finally good. Among other things, the insane amount of in-game purchases and a very slow paced gameplay basically ruined the experience for me in other games of this kind. Fortune Avenue doesn't seem to have those issues and actually made me enjoy Monopoly again. The fact that it runs natively on Linux is also a huge plus point.
垃圾游戏
Des couleurs pop, dignes des plus beaux d'ours d'or Haribo. La guitare jouant une musique festive, ruinez vos adversaire, robotiques ou humains, dans la joie et la bonne humeur... Ou inversement ! Avec des animations mignonnes et une interface kawaii au possible, on revisite le monopoly en plus diabolique !
vamos jogar pra relaxar, 10min depois o sortudo do amigo tá com 8 propriedade e um dado viciado, pq só assim, num pode nem ficar rico que mandam mat@, 10/10 muito divertido incluindo votaçao
Super bon Jeu on s'amuse beaucoup avec un pote, a acheter sans hésiter si vous aimez le style, bien mieux réalisé que le Monopoly et bien plus drôle ! A bientôt sur le plateau !!!
Fortune Avenue is unexpectedly moreish and has a charm of its own. As I write this, the game is in Early Access but is already quite complete and the developer is responding positively to my constructive feedback about its remaining rough edges.
Selling now
See how fast this game is selling right now — estimated copies and revenue per day from recent review growth.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.5K | 14 | 100% | $3.99 | |
| $5.9M | 5.7K | 74% | $39.99 | |
| $26.5K | 76 | 80% | $24.99 | |
| $24.3K | 101 | 94% | $9.99 | |
| $19K | 58 | 88% | $8.49 | |
| $729 | 30 | 60% | $0.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $17K | 59 | 86% | $19.99 | |
| $17K | 121 | 83% | $6.99 | |
| $17.1K | 97 | 49% | $9.99 | |
| $17K | 289 | 48% | $3.99 | |
| $17.1K | 146 | 93% | $7.99 | |
| $17K | 63 | 94% | $6.99 |