Fights in Tight Spaces (Prologue)

Unique idea for a game... haven't seen many of these before. If you like martial arts and card systems to see what moves you have for a round, definitely try this out.

This is one of those times where I wish I could post a mixed review. I'm aware this is just the prologue, but I feel it does offer enough of what you'll get in the base game. First of all, I've only played one run, dying on the final mission, so this review is in no way concrete, I would like to play it some more and see how I feel then. I'm not sure why, but the gameplay is both fun but also boring for me at the same time. I do like the turn based combat style, I'm certainly a fan of those as it really eases the stress for me, compared to real time combat. Why it's boring for me, I really can't put it into words at the moment, just something about it doesn't sit right with me. Hopefully I'll find out once.i play some more. I know this is a common theme as well with rogue likes/lites, but I don't really like the luck factor involved with drawing and getting cards. I know there could be a lot of strategy involved, but for someone who isn't an avid Rogue like/lite player, I'm having a hard time with it. Overall though, I did enjoy it, and again, this would be more of a mixed review. I do appreciate the devs making a prologue/demo, very thoughtful of them. Oh, I will visit this game again like I said, I would like to have my thoughts on it more fleshed out though before I decide on buying the full game.

把试玩版打了，就决定入正式版了，还挺有趣的卡牌构筑游戏，结合策略的玩法，格斗的表现形式，呈现出非常富有冲击感的画面，音乐也特别棒

"Fights in Tight Spaces (Prologue)" is is not a game. It's an advertisement for a product called "Fights in Tight Spaces". Fights in Tight Spaces is a poorly made turn based tactical combat game with some elements of CCG/deckbuilding shoehorned in like Al Bundy shoehorns his customers feet into too small shoes, and an art style blatantly ripped off from the credit sequence in Casino Royale... massively overrated bundle filler stuff with a completely insane AAA price that looks more like a mobile app than a PC game. But this isn't completely relevant because this is not Fights in Tight Spaces, it's just an advertisment for it, so it's not correct to try to review that completely distinct product. We must instead review this for what it is... an advertisement. If you enjoy advertisements, you can consume them for free on the web or on Youtube without needing to add them to your game library, download them, and then launch the advertising. It's impossible in a general sense to recommend people should do that over playing real, full games on Steam, and that applies here with "Fights in Tight Spaces (Prologue)" too. The purpose of this advertisement is to get you to shell out an eye watering $25 USD on buying Fights in Tight Spaces, and I don't recommend you do that either. This game is fairly dated at 5 years old... and even back then it looked old and busted compared to contemporary, professionally made 3D games of the same period. It looked bad then, it looks worse now. As an advertisement, this is only free in the same way that adverts on Youtube and banner ads in your browser are. This is a game demo that's been dumped on Steam to advertise another Steam store page in the hopes of raking in some cash. Just because advertisements are free, doesn't mean they're worth your time. It's important to understand there's a formal process to create a demo/page for a game which hasn't been followed here: https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/store/application/demos While it might seem like an inocuous mistake, publishing demos and advertisements as if they are full games is misleading and in some ways harmful. This advertisement is taking up marketing space and visibility that would be better made available to a developer that's done the right thing and created a full game. Instead, that visibility is given over to a demo/advert that's been published incorrectly and is polluting the marketplace. It's unclear if this mistake was made through incompetence or a deliberate intent to mislead gamers. Often developers may choose to incorrectly publish demo/advertisements as separate games as a cheap way to bypass paying Valve for marketing presence on the Steam front page, which may seem clever to them, but it's harmful behaviour and it's not good for gamers. Advertisements and incorrectly published demos don't add +1 to your game collector count, they aren't full games. It's impossible for me to recommend this incorrectly published advertising spam to gamers, you deserve better than adverts.

hard game but full game costs ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 24 dollars

Круто