
Richard the Third is an epic two-player wargame that recreates the bloody dynastic struggle in the 15th century between the royal houses of Lancaster and York for the throne of England.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
About



Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English, French, Spanish - Spain
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 40 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
As a digital representation, it's a little bit on the ugly side - the game engine doesn't seem to deal with aliasing very well so edges look a bit hideous and some textures don't look great. It looks like it was made about 15 years ago. I've played a short game and two long games and won all of them so far. I have some familiarity with block games (Hammer of the Scots) but the AI just doesn't seem good enough to give a challenge. Even when it's destined to lose unless it takes a risk it just moves blocks around if you have greater numbers in key positions until it looses. Tbh though I haven't tried the different personalities yet maybe some are harder than others. Hoping future updates/ releases address the above because there's so much to like about these block games. I'll keep buying there if you keep releasing them but please make them look nicer and implement better AI. Thanks for making a digital version.
Although I like the idea of the board game, this digital implementation is sorely lacking. I cannot recommend it in it's current state, or at it's high asking price. Why? Known game-breaking bugs (see it's Steam discussions board) have not been addressed in months. Game rules are not always followed correctly in several instances. For example, you are supposed to be able to place the Welsh troops anyplace in Wales. Alas the game doesn't think part of Wales is indeed Wales. It also won't let you select certain counties for placement or movement when an action card specifically tells you may do so. And battle resolution is not performed according to the rules (selection of targets, hit point carryover, etc). Someone obviously didn't read the rules carefully. :( For the not inconsiderable price of this game, even on sale ($15+), I would expect a fully functioning, well tested piece of software. This is not, by any stretch of the imagination. When & if updates address these issues (and there are quite a few, not all listed here), and the price is lowered to a more reasonable amount (say $6-10), I will consider changing my recommendation. For now, avoid. I didn't realize there were so many issues until it was too late to refund.
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Hours played at review time, across 40 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
The game is not ready for prime time.
Masa başından stratejik hamleleriniz ve taktiklerinizle başarılı bir ilerleyiş sağlamaya çalışabileceğiniz bu oyunda; düşmanlarınızı ortadan kaldırmak için çaba gösterebilirsiniz. Oynanış esnasında vermeniz gereken kararları da iyi bir şekilde analiz etmeye çalışıp, sonraki hamlelerinizi de düşünerek stratejilerinizi uygulamaya koymaya çalışabilirsiniz.
Excellent fun. Cant wait for Rommel in the Desert
《Richard3》一款基于英国历史上的玫瑰战争为历史背景发展而来的实体桌游电子版,游戏无论是在规则上还是画面上都实在还原桌游的感觉,所有不会有什么华丽的画面效果,基本上就是方便规则操作。游戏有着详细的规则教学流程,不熟悉的桌游的玩家完全不用担心上手问题,唯一可惜之处应该就是无法联机游戏,游戏本身倒是支持分屏模式,不过steam新推出的远程同乐功能应该可以弥补这一不足。 [h1]游戏体验[/h1] 游戏完全就是对实体桌游的电子化移植,unity引擎制作,画面表现力上还是可以的,游戏中棋子的移动就是在还原玩家手动移动的动作。游戏的主要玩法就是占领土地,使用卡牌出发特殊事件,注意排兵部署,尽可能多的消灭敌人的部队,当同一块土地上存在两股敌对势力时,便会触发战斗,战斗胜负通过掷骰子点数来决定。这方面就体现出了桌游电子化的优势,系统可以帮助玩家完成计算工作。 [h1]便捷的新手提示系统[/h1] 如果是不太熟悉游戏规则的玩家也不用太担心游戏上手难度,游戏为玩家提供了新手提示功能,指导玩家如何游戏,第一次玩的时候的教程知道也是非常详细,游戏规则不难,玩个几遍也就知道大概了。 [h1]总结[/h1] 游戏在移植和还原桌游方面做的不错,无论是画面还是玩法,几乎都还原的很到位,基于英国玫瑰战争为历史背景的桌游,以占领土地和消灭敌军为主要玩法,游戏有着详细的规则教学流程,唯一可惜之处应该就是无法联机游戏,游戏本身倒是支持分屏模式,不过steam新推出的远程同乐功能应该可以弥补这一不足。 [quote]欢迎关注我们的鉴赏家:[url=https://store.steampowered.com/curator/35402982/]走心评测[/url] ←遵从内心,写出真实感受 欢迎加入我们Steam组:[url=https://steamcommunity.com/groups/ZXPC]走心评测[/url]←点击加入,一起探索游戏的乐趣 喜欢这篇评论,也麻烦点个赞,让更多人能够看到![/quote]
J'apprécie le suspense dans ce jeu en demi-aveugle qu'apporte le système des blocs. En second lieu, la balance entre choisir de bouger, combattre ou faire venir des renforts donne un grand intérêt. Enfin, le graphisme est attrayant, les règles sont simples et le jeu présente une époque peu connu, ou alors surtout pas les Britanniques et cela m'a agréablement changé des Ardennes 44 ou du Front Russe.
Una fiel traslación del juego de tablero. Una lástima que la IA deje mucho que desear. Ideal para el multijugador.
Manages to get the ebb and flow of fortunes for the period captured reasonably well within the well known, readily adaptable and functional block system although still like the tactile direct interaction of a tangible game for non solo play
[H1] Columbia Gamesの同名ボードウォーゲームをデジタル化したタイトル [/H1] シェイクスピアの著作をモチーフにした、いわゆるシェイクスピアシリーズの1つであり、薔薇戦争キャンペーンを3ターンの計21手番で争う仕組みとなっている。 接敵するまで敵ブロックの状況が分からない「戦場の霧」ルールや、カードによるブロックの動員・活性化といったあたりが特徴的なメカニズムだろうか。 動員した貴族や傭兵は冬が来ると勝手に本拠地に帰還してしまうため、新たな戦役(ターン)の開始を見越した戦線構築が、なかなかに難しい。 AIの弱さはおいとくとして、ストラテジーとしては十分に合格点。 ただしオリジナルとは異なるルールがあり、戸惑う部分が多い。 たとえば、 ・手札のマリガンルールが実装されてない。 ・除去された傭兵ブロックがプールに置かれてしまう。ウェールズを除く傭兵は、それぞれの開始位置に戻すのが正しいはず。 ・1460年の開始時にヨーク教区のブロックがヨーク家のプールにも入ってしまっている。本来なら(アナログ版ver 1.04ルール)、ランカスター家だけのはず。 ・同じ戦力のブロックが存在する場合、ヒットの割り当てはブロックの所有者が決めるはずだが、勝手に割り当てられてしまう。 ・冬季のブロック帰還時、敵にホームを占拠されている貴族ブロックがExileエリアに戻されてしまう。本来であれば、ネヴィル一族以外はプールに戻すはず。 というところ。 まあ、細かい話だけれども。 [table] [tr] [th]言語依存度[/th] [th]★★☆☆☆[/th] [/tr] [tr] [td]難易度[/td] [td]★★☆☆☆[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]王様だって戦死するよ度[/td] [td]★★★★☆[/td] [/tr] [/table]
Selling now
See how fast this game is selling right now — estimated copies and revenue per day from recent review growth.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $53.7K | 74 | 53% | $24.99 | |
| $25.5K | 27 | 74% | $24.99 | |
| $22.6K | 30 | 73% | $24.99 | |
| $17.2K | 29 | 59% | $19.99 | |
| $5.4M | 8.6K | 89% | $20.99 | |
| $896.4K | 613 | 79% | $34.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $58.1K | 653 | 96% | $4.99 | |
| $58.1K | 219 | 73% | $9.99 | |
| $58.1K | 50 | 86% | $59.99 | |
| $58K | 100 | 88% | $19.99 | |
| $58K | 816 | 67% | $4.99 | |
| $58K | 288 | 94% | $9.99 |