Wild boar survival

My highscore is 9

high score of 130 pretty chill for the best to ever do it

Игра "Wild Boar Survival" – это довольно специфический, но увлекательный симулятор жизни дикого кабана. Графика, конечно, не AAA-класса, но вполне функциональна и позволяет погрузиться в атмосферу леса. Главный плюс игры – необычный геймплей. Вы должны выживать, искать еду, пить воду, избегать хищников и конкурировать с другими кабанами. Поначалу может показаться однообразным, но постепенно, с развитием характеристик кабана и открытием новых территорий, игра затягивает. Интересно изучать карту, находить скрытые места и охотиться на мелкую дичь. Иногда возникают забавные ситуации, например, когда убегаешь от стаи волков или пытаешься защитить свою территорию от более сильных конкурентов. Конечно, есть и недостатки. Управление порой кажется немного неуклюжим, а анимация движения оставляет желать лучшего. Но в целом, если вы ищете что-то оригинальное и не боитесь скромной графики, "Wild Boar Survival" может стать неплохим способом скоротать время и почувствовать себя в шкуре дикого вепря. Рекомендую любителям survival-игр с необычной тематикой.

Thousands of retro top-down shooter/brawlers are infesting Steam, and "Wild boar survival" is just more pollution in a crowded market of terrible games. There are thousands of these on Steam (you can go see for yourself if you search for the tag on the store, I'm not kidding). And this is far from being one of the best of those. This seems like it was published as some kind of joke or something.. a simple 2D top down retro pixelcrap wave survival brawler where you take on the role of an infant with a sword and kite and slash at wild boars. Why? Nobody knows... this truly is garbage. The top-down shooter genre is pretty much obsolete, even console peasants don't bother with them anymore. Just a tiny number of top-down shooters went anywhere on PC despite the little value they offer (Enter the Gungeon, etc). This is nowhere near being as good as those. Even without a price tag, it's easy to see why gamers ignored this in favor of modern, professionally developed 3D games. This is offering nothing new or interesting. With no way to change the resolution or tweak graphics settings, you probably won't be able to run the game at your screen's native resolution. This design decision means the game will look bad on just about every modern PC. Since the controls can't be customized, this makes the game inaccessible for a wide range of gamers, including those who are left-handed, have physical impairments, or use international keyboard layouts. Developers have a responsibility to ensure gamers can customise their experience with the game. The game is really simple and unambitious in terms of implementation, more of a tech demo or one of those cases where an amateur developer spends $100 to publish something on Steam Direct to see if it's possible. Yes, obviously it's possible. A proof of concept, tech demo, or something that's less than a little blip on the radar isn't offering anything truly valuable to gamers. This game fails on the visuals because of the use of incredibly lazy, ugly pixelcrap. The developer would probably argue this is a "deliberate artistic choice" but we all know it's because the developer was incapable of producing anything better. The game looks very poor compared to professionally developed games. Whether the developer lacked the skill or the budget for modern visuals is irrelevant, this looks bad because of that developer decision. Gaming is a visual medium, and it's a disservice to gamers when developers don't bother doing their jobs and creating contemporary, high quality visuals. Games like Undertale and Stardew Valley are rare exceptions that succeeded [i]in spite[/i] of their awful graphics. Pixelcrap is never really okay, and there's no excuse for games that look this bad. Let's look at the price and what kind of value this actually offers gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. Even as a free game, this couldn't find an audience. With a peak of [b]only 2 players[/b], it's clear the Steam community took one look and walked away. They literally couldn't pay people to spend time playing this. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? This is a hard pass. There's no immediate financial commitment, but there are thousands of more compelling games on the platform that will give you a lot more enjoyment for your time.