Simple Farm

9 из 10 Не плохая игра, бегать, собирать урожай. Стамина заканчивается быстро. Не понятно как убивать врага. В общем, нормально, играла не долго, простая игра, на один раз. https://youtu.be/Ylc-OqbQGLQ

Simple Farm sadly hasn't been updated in a while, but it's a very cute game, worth the money, you get what you pay for

"Simple Farm" is basically a short, small, lightweight top down/twin stick shooter with a gimmick around planting seeds and growing crops, but if you're looking for Farmville on Steam (why), this ain't it. And it's no Stardew Valley, either. What do you do in the game? All you do in this game is variations on basic top down shooter gameplay, plus some incredibly primitive building activity (to create the farm) coupled with one of the laziest technical deliveries I've seen here in the amateur section of Steam Direct for literally minutes. Frankly the concept might have even worked if the delivery was even remotely up to scratch. The game is really simple and unambitious in terms of implementation, more of a tech demo or one of those cases where an amateur developer spends $100 to publish something on Steam Direct to see if it's possible. Yes, obviously it's possible. A proof of concept, tech demo, or something that's less than a little blip on the radar isn't offering anything truly valuable to gamers. This features really godawful pixelcrap "art" instead of real graphics. It's hard to say if this was because the developer didn't have the skill to do the job of creating 3D visuals, or couldn't afford to hire someone who does, but it also doesn't matter. What matters is that this looks much worse than most other games because of that decision, and that's a major deterrent to gamers. Games like Terraria and Stardew Valley succeeded [i]despite[/i] the bad graphics, not because of them. This game is fairly dated at 5 years old... and even back then it looked old and busted compared to contemporary, professionally made 3D games of the same period. It looked bad then, it looks worse now. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. There's no initial download price, but the developer was charging $1 USD for this. Price barriers, especially on low quality products, can be a direct cause of failure. It seems like a nice gesture for the game to have no up-front cost anymore, but it also tells us that the game wasn't good enough to succeed as a paid product. This is also a bit of a slap in the face to anyone who showed enough questionable judgement to pay money for this... nobody got refunded. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 3 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Given that this free title won't increase your game collector count, is it worth your time to add it to your library? I think you should give this one a miss. Although it's free, your time and storage are valuable resources, and the market is filled with superior options.

Very fun!

Its a nice game to play for 6.9 hours so you can have a game were you have 6.9 hours Edit: ♥♥♥♥ it gave me an extra .1 hours

Very good game to just mindlessly play