
A idle-clicker game, Pumpkin Clicker is about making as many pumpkins as you can, and then some more!
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. Copies below reflect the player base, not paid sales.
Media

About

Genres
Stats
Languages: English
Engagement
Reviews
⠀
Another clicker, this is even without NFT items drops
[i]#935[/i][h1]Pumpkin Clicker[/h1] Kolejna gra w której naszym zadaniem jest klikać w przedmiot i wbijać punkty oraz co jakiś czas otrzymać coś do naszego ekwipunku. Niestety nie polecam gier NFT.
Related
Related
Trends
Concurrent players on Steam, sampled daily since tracking started.
Hours played at review time, across 24 reviews with recorded playtime.
Olabildiğince çok sayıda balkabağı yapmaya ve ardından daha fazlasını yapmaya dayalıdır! Muzdan daha iyi. Tıklayın tıklayın tıklayın.
00/66805455006 no actual game play here
2.1/10 move along
1/8008135
нет
[quote][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_slop][b]Warning: AI Slop[/b][/url] This game is partially or completely made with talentless, soulless AI generated content.[/quote] "Pumpkin Clicker" is a brainless clicker/incrementer... you know the type, click on stuff to make numbers go up so you can buy stuff to help you click on stuff to make numbers go up so you can buy stuff to... you get the idea. The brainless gameplay is, unsusprisingly, accompanied with an equally low quality technical implementation and poor presentation, resulting in yet another horribly low quality shovelware game that might as well have been done in a web browser. As mentioned, this features really godawful, "wrong" looking AI slop instead of genuinely and sincerely created game assets. It's hard to say if this was because the developer didn't have the skill to do the job of creating real game assets or couldn't afford to hire someone who does, but it also doesn't matter. What matters is that this looks bad because of that decision. AI slop sticks out like a sore thumb... and it comes across as insulting. There's also the old adage that those who lack the budget and talent to make their own game assets usually lack the budget and talent to do the rest of the job of game development properly, too, and that's glaringly obvious here. On pricing, this is "free" enough, at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. Despite having no up-front cost, this failed to appeal to the 120 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB showed the game peaked at only 3 concurrent players... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Nope. This isn't worth downloading. While this didn't cost me any money up front, I still feel ripped off.
非常垃圾的游戏,毫无乐趣,纯纯的破坏鼠标而已
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Audience
Estimated from the language of this game's reviews — a proxy for where players are, not official Steam demographics.
Related
| House Flipper | $65.8M | 110.8K | 94% | $24.99 |
| gogh: Focus with Your Avatar | $1.2M | 5.3K | 91% | $7.19 |
| Blazing Beaks | $256K | 2.6K | 83% | $3.74 |
| Spilled! | $1.1M | 5.2K | 94% | $5.99 |
| Caravanners | $499.7K | 695 | 37% | $10.79 |
| Party Club | $540.8K | 3.4K | 72% | $4.99 |