King Arthur's Gold

Huge potential wasted. Game is dead, community nearly doesn't exist. All because of developers who pulled the trigger.

**A Review of *King Arthur's Gold*** *By Arthur Schopenhauer* Observe the spectacle: knights, builders, archers, rendered in the crude vernacular of a Super Nintendo cartridge. The pixels are blocky, the animations abrupt, the palette limited to the testimony of a man who has only glimpsed colour. It is, aesthetically speaking, a fossil. Yet the fossil moves. One constructs a fortress. The enemy constructs a trebuchet. The fortress crumbles. One rebuilds, differently, more desperately, while arrows perforate the parapet and sappers undermine the foundation. The cycle is frantic, repetitive, and entirely devoid of narrative dignity. It is the siege of Troy as conceived by a child with infinite patience and limited crayons. The community, meanwhile, has achieved an advanced state of degeneracy. Veterans patrol the servers with the serene cruelty of apex predators. The newcomer, attempting to contribute, is perforated, mocked, and informed of his ancestry. The learning curve is not a curve but a wall, and the wall is manned by archers who have not missed a shot since 2012. Thus the game is ugly, unbalanced, and socially hostile. I have accumulated eight hundred hours. I recommend this abomination without qualification. It will consume your evenings, erode your dignity, and offer, in exchange, the fleeting ecstasy of a trebuchet shot that arcs perfectly over the enemy keep and annihilates their king. You will hate it. You will play it. This is the arrangement.