Five Nights At Stickman

A white tear ran down my leg

Game of the Year

My friend and I played this game within a discord call and the game used a large sum of AI generated art, anything that was not AI may have taken a preschooler about 10 seconds to draw on MS paint. Saying this game is "not fun" is an understatement, this game made me sad for whatever bum thought it would be a good idea to publish this.

It's better than I thought, i only played night 1. I think the nights take a little bit too long to finish but it's an ok game :)

[h1]#tinygamereviews[/h1] [code]funny for five minutes; boring for forty[/code] [list] [*][b][u]Overall Score[/u][/b]: 2/5 [/list] [hr][/hr] [h1][b]Curator: [url=https://store.steampowered.com/curator/42137521/]Nostalginauts[/url][/b][/h1]

Do NOT listen to the bad reviews, This game is my personal game of the year even if half the assets are AI which was disapointing to say the least. but this masterpiece clearly rivals Scott Cawthons work by 10 fold. I cant even explain how much joy i expereinced while playing this game its almost unreal, "but you only played 11 minutes" you must be thinking to yourself but when i tell you those 11 minutes were the best 11 minutes of my life i mean it. Buy this game NOW before its too late to see what TRUE art is like. if i sequel were to ever release this year we yes WE are ALL purchasing to support the next big horror franchise. Thank you FNAS dev for creating this wonder of a game. EDIT: no more AI, truly now a masterclass of a game.

"Five Nights At Stickman" is a ripoff of Five Nights at Freddys (Copyright Scott Cawthon, 2014). The concept, mechanics, and visual direction have been plagiarised wholesale from the original.At this stage no legal action has been taken by Scott Cawthon against the "developer" here, but it's never off the table, as previous copyright law cases have shown. Aside from the obvious ethical problems with just copying someone else's game, the least you could do if you're going to steal an idea is do it better than the original. Five Nights At Stickman is noticeably worse than Five Nights at Freddys in every meaningful way. From a technical perspective, the game doesn't meet basic minimum requirements that most PC gamers expect as standard. The visuals in this game are a complete joke, it's seriously just a bunch of MS-Paint sprites/images that look like they were lazily scrawled out over the space of a couple of hours. Like, with the mouse, it doesn't look like they even used a Wacom tablet or anything. It's so bad even pixel "art" would look better than this. Pure MSPaint. It's unclear if this is due to lack of budget to arrange someone who can create graphical assets properly, or lack of talent, regardless, the overall visual quality of the game is extremely low, enough on its own to deter gamers. There's no option to change the resolution and no useful graphics tweaks. There's no way to ensure this is running at the native resolution of your display. There's no guarantee this game will look right on any PC as a result of this hamfisted design decision. The controls can't be customised because the game has such a dumbed down, simplified interface that it's just point and click stuff like a browser/Flash game. The fact that the interface is this dumbed down might be seen as a problem in itself, however... this is a fairly shallow experience if you're the kind of gamer that likes to play games with deep, rich control schemes and interaction. You'll get none of that here. Those technical issues put this game beneath what is expected from a contemporary, professionally developed PC game. The poor quality of this game is reflected by how many people spent time with it. At the time of this review, SteamDB shows the all-time peak player number was [b]only 2 players[/b]. This is a remarkably low number, and now, the only player activity occurs once or twice a month, presumably someone loading it up to see what it is then quickly uninstalling it. Considering there's over 130 million gamers on Steam and well over 140,000 games for gamers to choose from, the overwhelming lack of interest in this low quality game is to be expected. So, should you buy this game? Is this one of the best of the 140,000+ games on Steam? Five Nights At Stickman is relatively cheap at $1, but it's not worth it. There's enough defects and quality problems with this game that it's not worth recommending to gamers. It's just a joke game. [b]Note:[/b] Because this is more of a "joke" game, intended to draw attention from controversy or in the hopes of going viral because it's "so bad it's good" (but it isn't good at all), there's nothing here to offer to serious gamers. As usual, with most awful/joke games, all the comedians come out of the woodwork. The vast majority of the reviews for this game are joke reviews, such as "this game cured my cancer, saved my marriage, changed my life" etc. Because most of the reviews are as insincere as the game itself is, and if you removed the fake/joke reviews the game would have a markedly different review score, the positive review score for this game should be disregarded. [quote][b][url=https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/marketing/profile]Profile Features Limited![/url][/b] Valve have marked this game as "Profile Features Limited" at the time of this review. This is usually caused by poor sales figures and low community acceptance for the game (to date). Until this status changes, this game will not give you +1 to your Game Collector badge count, appear in profile achievements or any other Steam meta-accomplishments, nor can it be displayed in some profile showcases. If these factors are important to you, it may be worth holding off before buying this game.[/quote]

This is the greatest FNAF fangame to ever exist. The shock I experienced upon watching Eclipse's jumpscare was paralyzing, and it put me in a coma for 18 years.

game of the year easily

Am i stupid to have my hose voll while i play this game?