
In a world on its deathbed, explore and connect with your neighbors for one last day.
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. Copies below reflect the player base, not paid sales.
Media

About

Genres
Stats
Languages: English**languages with full audio support
Reviews
Ölüm döşeğindeki bir dünyada, son bir gün için komşularınızla bağlantı kurun ve onları keşfedin.
"Final Hour" is a very badly made RPG Maker-esque 2D top down retro pixelcrap "adventure" game where the world is ending so you wander around and talk to NPCs to get some really cringey badly written fan-fiction tier dialogue. This was a complete failure on Steam Direct. There's an overwhelming amount of mediocre Visual Novel/E-book style cutscenes in this game. The developers failed one of the most basic, fundamental requirements of game design.. "Show, don't tell." So you'll spend a huge amount of time not playing the game, but clicking through endless lines of poorly written VN text cutscenes because the developers couldn't work out how to relate their narrative through the game mechanics, and decided instead it would be better to compete with reading a book for your time. We're here to play games, not read through hours of garbage intersituals. Your gaming rig is not a Kindle. This game fails on the visuals because of the use of incredibly lazy, ugly pixelcrap. The developer would probably argue this is a "deliberate artistic choice" but we all know it's because the developer was incapable of producing anything better. The game looks very poor compared to professionally developed games. Whether the developer lacked the skill or the budget for modern visuals is irrelevant; the choice detracts from the game. Gaming is a visual medium, and it's a disservice to gamers when developers don't bother doing their jobs and creating contemporary, high quality visuals. Games like Undertale and Stardew Valley are rare exceptions that succeeded [i]in spite[/i] of their awful graphics. Pixelcrap is never really okay, and there's no excuse for games that look this bad. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. This is "free" enough (not every "free" game in the "free" section is truly free, there's usually some hidden price tag), at least you won't be expected to spend any more money after you download this, but just because something is free doesn't mean it's good, and the cost of a game is more than just financial, your time is valuable too. Even as a free game, this couldn't find an audience. With a peak of [b]only 2 players[/b], it's clear the Steam community took one look and walked away. They literally couldn't pay people to spend time playing this. Since free games don't contribute to your game collector badge and other profile stuff, is this a worthwhile addition to your Steam library? I think you should give this one a miss. Although it's free, your time and storage are valuable resources, and the market is filled with superior options.
Related
Related
Trends
Concurrent players on Steam, sampled daily since tracking started.
Had fun with this one. Good free to play game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp1zGh950Bk
Momentum
Pace estimated from the game's recent review growth (our daily snapshots) at its own sales-per-review ratio — a momentum signal, not booked sales.
Related
| 7 Days to Die | $425.3M | 398.5K | 87% | $44.99 |
| Palworld | $415M | 463.2K | 94% | $29.99 |
| Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord | $309.8M | 294.6K | 88% | $49.99 |
| Project Zomboid | $239.1M | 464.4K | 94% | $24.99 |
| Terraria | $187.5M | 1.5M | 97% | $9.99 |
| Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 | $177.7M | 274.2K | 95% | $39.99 |